![]() |
Re: [FRC Blog] The 2016 Season, by the Numbers 2
Quote:
|
Re: [FRC Blog] The 2016 Season, by the Numbers 2
I'm quite happy that there are 33 teams using Python. I would have guessed ~15 when the season started. :)
|
Re: [FRC Blog] The 2016 Season, by the Numbers 2
Quote:
|
Re: [FRC Blog] The 2016 Season, by the Numbers 2
Quote:
As for the where, either check my Sig, or the post above. |
Re: [FRC Blog] The 2016 Season, by the Numbers 2
Quote:
Proud to be part of the 1%. All the judges and teams we talked to were very surprised and interested to learn that we used a unique language for programming. I'd love to see it take off more. |
Re: [FRC Blog] The 2016 Season, by the Numbers 2
Quote:
|
Re: [FRC Blog] The 2016 Season, by the Numbers 2
Quote:
|
Re: [FRC Blog] The 2016 Season, by the Numbers 2
Quote:
|
Re: [FRC Blog] The 2016 Season, by the Numbers 2
Quote:
|
Re: [FRC Blog] The 2016 Season, by the Numbers 2
Quote:
|
Re: [FRC Blog] The 2016 Season, by the Numbers 2
Quote:
[cue Mark McLeod with the real numbers... wait, CD doesn't work that way] |
Re: [FRC Blog] The 2016 Season, by the Numbers 2
2363 Triple Helix should be row 861.
|
Re: [FRC Blog] The 2016 Season, by the Numbers 2
Quote:
|
Re: [FRC Blog] The 2016 Season, by the Numbers 2
As a Supplier we really appreciate that FIRST released this data.
There are a couple of insights that we can gain from looking at this, which help us to make some choices about our future products and their uses. We had some interesting thoughts, specifically related to motor controllers The number of total motor controllers reported used is probably lower than it actually is, mainly due to the number of teams that use Y cables to power their PWM motor controllers. The types of PWM motor controllers reported likely has some errors in it, as the report out is based on library choice in code and all of them are the same (victor, talon, SPARK, etc). The total number of SPARK's used for example is considerably less than the number that are "in the wild" which means either people used different libraries in their code or a significant portion of them are used in practice bots or for testing ( I suspect a bit of both) There are 8 teams that show having zero motor controllers.....:confused: The average number of controllers per robot is 7.25 I am 99% sure line 1089 is 2848 |
Re: [FRC Blog] The 2016 Season, by the Numbers 2
I was slightly thrown off by the lack of "encoders" considering we had 6 incremental and 1 absolute encoder, but I'm 95% sure that line 592 is us.
Most of our encoders were plugged directly into the TalonSRXs. Not a lot of 2006 Rookie year C++ teams with no pneumatics. We definitely had more than 7 Talons on our CAN interface, though I don't remember 10. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 23:43. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi