| Bryce2471 |
13-07-2016 01:04 |
Re: pic: Everything in the tube drive (too late to turn back now)
My apologies for the slow response. I just got off work.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chak
(Post 1596514)
Looking at the wheel set-up, are you planning on making bumper mounts that will make a hexagonal drivetrain?
|
Something like that. I'm partial to octagons for ease of mounting.
Quote:
What's holding the bearings near the shifter in? It doesn't have a flange, so it confuses me.:o
|
Its flange is bolted to the inside of the tube to save space.
Quote:
Assemby could be easier with some extra access holes to stick a pair of pliers in to hold stuff still.
|
That's true, but I still think this design would take several lifetimes to put together, so I don't plan on ever building it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by asid61
(Post 1596515)
I like your packaging much more than mine, but I can see why it would be impossible to assemble...
I'm seconding Chak's question about what the bump is. Did you mill down the entire outside of the tube except for that part?
|
Thanks, and yes I prefer that to a lightening pattern.
Quote:
EDIT: what size tubes are those?
|
2" by 2" by 0.125" wall.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lil' Lavery
(Post 1596521)
When you expand the drive rails to 2"x2" (which is my educated guess as those rail dimensions), how much space are you actually saving by going in tube?
|
Not enough to be worth it. This design was half way between a joke about the "put everything in the tube" hype train, and a fun CAD exercise.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cothron Theiss
(Post 1596525)
Any reason you put the outer wheels on the inner edge of the tube and not the outside? Having them on the outside reduces turning scrub (slightly) and lets you extend your belly pan into the corners of the frame.
Though, having a hexagonal frame perimeter might make it easier to avoid pins.
|
Yep, I mostly did it that way because the gearbox design allowed me too, and I like the bulged side drives.
|