![]() |
IRI Alliances
1) 2056 118 33 4587 (W)
2) 1114 195 225 1405 (F) 3) 3620 67 3683 5254 (SF) 4) 1619 1241 133 868 (SF) 5) 217 2451 494 3641 (QF) 6) 2481 330 3824 1640 (QF) 7) 45 179 1806 233 (QF) 8) 2771 16 1024 1023 (QF) No declines. |
Re: IRI Alliances
waiting for 300+ scores .
|
Re: IRI Alliances
That's a beefy #1 alliance. Playoffs will be something to watch.
|
Re: IRI Alliances
Quote:
|
Re: IRI Alliances
All of those top four alliances look pretty beefy, but it's IRI. Anything can happen!;)
|
Re: IRI Alliances
Quote:
|
Re: IRI Alliances
Quote:
|
Re: IRI Alliances
Quote:
|
Re: IRI Alliances
Am I the only one surprised that 20, 27, 910, 2052, and 3538 didn't get picked for IRI elims? (especially considering that 2 of these teams appeared on Einstein this year)
Nevertheless, it was fun watching the livestream. Congrats to 2056, 118, 33, and 4587 for winning IRI this year. |
Re: IRI Alliances
Quote:
Picking teams at IRI is difficult, because there are so many amazing options. |
Re: IRI Alliances
Quote:
|
So that was ... fun. 45 was a more than a bit surprised that we would be picking (we didn't have scouts and at lunch on Saturday we were like "oh, we should create a picklist"). I'm really proud of the drive team for doing an awesome job during qualifying matches. Elims were tough, but I'm not sure there was ever much of a chance. The first match would've been 214 to 260 if we were fully on the batter, and the second match was we ran the same strategy with different robots and that didn't work out as well as we thought it would have. In retrospect, would we have done things differently? I think our picks were the most competitive we could have done. We could have had a silly alliance, maybe a return of the dream team would've been in order (1024,1747,45) with 461 or 71 as the 4th. However, I think we can go home happy with the performance we displayed out there.
|
Re: IRI Alliances
Quote:
|
Re: IRI Alliances
Quote:
|
Re: IRI Alliances
Quote:
|
Re: IRI Alliances
Quote:
|
Re: IRI Alliances
Quote:
We take pride in the data that is gathered by our scouts and attribute a lot of our recent success to having the data to develop a winning strategy for matches and pick lists. At IRI we had multiple MAR teams scouting using our CloudScout system. We use tablets with a custom developed FireScout app to scout that feeds to a proxy phone and uploads to our CloudScout system. Coaches have the data in hand immediately after matches are completed and uploaded. Right now IRI scouting is available to the public so you can see the kind of data we gathered. http://scouting.techfire225.org |
Re: IRI Alliances
Quote:
Funny to see the numbers for my team 1405. We didn't score any boulders the entire time at IRI, our only "real points" were in autonomous. :p |
Re: IRI Alliances
Quote:
|
Re: IRI Alliances
Quote:
|
Re: IRI Alliances
Quote:
|
Re: IRI Alliances
Quote:
If you added in the penalty scores as two of our robots climbers failed, and we killed a battery in that match, resulting in many penalties, the score was over 300. I don't think those fouls should count towards the world high score, but you still have to commend the excellent engineering on 254's alliance. It was beautiful incredible watching that alliance play. Now I want to see 2056, 148 and 254 play a match together. That would most certainly result in a 300+ point game. :D |
Re: IRI Alliances
Quote:
Great work! |
Re: IRI Alliances
Quote:
We had 7 teams involved, so we had a lot of labor available, but you can pull it off with 7 people + an admin for device management. For most of the match, scouts add dots to a map, and statistics are generated based on where the dots are placed and what type of dots they were. We have 7 Samsung Galaxy tablets (for the 6 robot positions and one for human players) that collect data through a data collection app and connect via bluetooth to a phone, which pipes the data to a server. The server has a script that updates calculations every 5 minutes, and people can look at that compiled data on an Android app, an iOS app, or on our website. During the season, we require an authorization key, but we opened it up for IRI since we were scouting with other teams. It's nice, since as soon as a match is over, we can look up teams to see what they did. The match schedule is automatically pulled from The Blue Alliance in most cases (otherwise it is added manually). For IRI, since we knew which defenses were going to be in each position for each match, that information was pre-coded in the system and scouts only had to add a blue dot on the defense to indicate whatever was in that position was crossed. The entire system is modular, so it is very easy to add new charts, items scouted, or statistics displayed in the app and on the website. |
Re: IRI Alliances
Quote:
|
Re: IRI Alliances
Quote:
|
Re: IRI Alliances
Quote:
The more time scouts are watching a match instead of writing or typing allows for more accurate data. One of the nice features of this system is if you are at a venue where Internet access is not available because mobile signals are flaky or no internet we are able to use our 2 10" tablets to be able to update via bluetooth from the lead scouts tablet with all the data and have it in hand. It really is a great system and Andrew is awesome. :-) |
Re: IRI Alliances
Quote:
Now we will have to start scouting the scouting systems other teams are using, potentially moving teams that have better scouting data up on the pick list.* This system seems like it could reduce match scouting errors by making the job more visual. ----------- * Those teams are probably high on the list based on performance anyway. |
Re: IRI Alliances
Quote:
|
Re: IRI Alliances
Quote:
Really reduces the time our scouting meetings take now by at least a couple hours. This is the second year we have used it and hope to expand it for whatever next years game will be. Good data in is good data out.. :-) |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:49 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi