Chief Delphi
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)
-   General Forum (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   Looking for District Naysayers (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=149640)

Tyler Olds 25-07-2016 14:04
Looking for Critics of Districts
 
Hey CD,

Are you someone (or know someone) who is not in favor of the district model for your region or even for all of FRC? If so, we want you to join in a live discussion on FUN's show in August! You will have your opportunity to voice your opinion and make your arguments on why you believe the district model is not the best path.

Please feel free to PM me, send an email to firstupdatesnow@gmail.com or post here if you are interested or know someone whom may.

Brian Maher 25-07-2016 14:58
Re: Looking for District Naysayers
 
I am not who you are looking for, but it is my understanding that the biggest complaints from a team-perspective stem from increased travel expenses, especially in areas with low team density. If you're looking for an opponent of the district model, I'd look for teams from one of those areas.

notmattlythgoe 25-07-2016 14:59
Re: Looking for District Naysayers
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by BMSOTM (Post 1598348)
As evident from my post history, I am the complete opposite of who you are looking for. It is my understanding that the biggest complaints from a team-perspective stem from increased travel expenses, especially in areas with low team density, which may require teams to take on an additional overnight trip to compete at a second event. I hear this is particularly problematic for Hawaiian and international (non-US/Canada) teams, many of whom have to fly and stay in a hotel for even their nearest event.

There are also concerns about having enough volunteers to staff a district, but the California District Proposal thread covers this topic in-depth.
I don't think this thread is here to start yet another discussion about the pros and cons of districts.

Brian Maher 25-07-2016 15:02
Re: Looking for District Naysayers
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by notmattlythgoe (Post 1598349)
I don't think this thread is here to start yet another discussion about the pros and cons of districts.
My bad, thanks for pointing this out. When I was typing out my comment, I didn't realize how argumentative it sounded. I don't want to start this debate again.

I gutted it to better answer Tyler's question.

aJASONt_angles 25-07-2016 15:28
Re: Looking for District Naysayers
 
I have the perspective of being on both a team that greatly benefits from the districts system AND a team that greatly benefited from the regional system. I don't feel like I'm a naysayer but I do think that the Regional system made my previous team a better group and gave me a more powerful experience as a student.

Not sure how that factors into your question so I thought I'd just post.

M217 25-07-2016 17:34
Re: Looking for District Naysayers
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by BMSOTM (Post 1598348)
I am not who you are looking for, but it is my understanding that the biggest complaints from a team-perspective stem from increased travel expenses, especially in areas with low team density. If you're looking for an opponent of the district model, I'd look for teams from one of those areas.
In this same vein, I'd think international teams would have the most trouble if FIRST converted large-scale to the district system. I think you could certainly find some good anti-district arguments from someone with that perspective.

((Again, I'm personally pro-district and not the person you're looking for.))

evoluti1 25-07-2016 19:11
Re: Looking for District Naysayers
 
I'm also not who you're looking for, but you may get better results by looking for "critics" or "opponents" of the district model. People who hold contrary opinions often don't appreciate being labeled "naysayers" as it makes their viewpoint sound illegitimate, and they may fear they won't be treated fairly in any discussion you're trying to have with them, which I'm sure is not your intention!

Michael Corsetto 25-07-2016 19:36
Re: Looking for District Naysayers
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by evoluti1 (Post 1598387)
I'm also not who you're looking for, but you may get better results by looking for "critics" or "opponents" of the district model. People who hold contrary opinions often don't appreciate being labeled "naysayers" as it makes their viewpoint sound illegitimate, and they may fear they won't be treated fairly in any discussion you're trying to have with them, which I'm sure is not your intention!
I'll second this. The tone does make a difference! Good point.

Anupam Goli 25-07-2016 22:19
Re: Looking for District Naysayers
 
Can I present a different viewpoint? Say one for districts, but against these single-state (save for Michigan) district systems?

Tyler Olds 25-07-2016 22:23
Re: Looking for District Naysayers
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by evoluti1 (Post 1598387)
I'm also not who you're looking for, but you may get better results by looking for "critics" or "opponents" of the district model. People who hold contrary opinions often don't appreciate being labeled "naysayers" as it makes their viewpoint sound illegitimate, and they may fear they won't be treated fairly in any discussion you're trying to have with them, which I'm sure is not your intention!
Good point, I think I just got a little wordsmithy. I don't believe I can change the thread title can I?

ratdude747 25-07-2016 22:30
Re: Looking for District Naysayers
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyler Olds (Post 1598407)
Good point, I think I just got a little wordsmithy. I don't believe I can change the thread title can I?
No, but I'm sure a mod would change it for you if you told them what you wanted it to say.

Sperkowsky 25-07-2016 23:05
Re: Looking for District Naysayers
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyler Olds (Post 1598407)
Good point, I think I just got a little wordsmithy. I don't believe I can change the thread title can I?
You can if it's within 24 hours just edit then go to advanced.

simpsonboy77 26-07-2016 01:15
Re: Looking for District Naysayers
 
I'm all for districts, however by switching to districts the events lost a sparkle they had. The main detractor is the fact that we simply do not see as many unique teams. Outside of the 120ish teams MAR has, we seldom see teams outside of MAR. By having 60 teams instead of 40, the stands would just have 50% more people. It felt bigger, more energetic. With this point in mind, I'd still rather have districts. For the same price, you get 2 events, AND you get more plays at each of those events than a regional.

ASD20 26-07-2016 09:26
Re: Looking for District Naysayers
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by simpsonboy77 (Post 1598453)
I'm all for districts, however by switching to districts the events lost a sparkle they had. The main detractor is the fact that we simply do not see as many unique teams. Outside of the 120ish teams MAR has, we seldom see teams outside of MAR. By having 60 teams instead of 40, the stands would just have 50% more people. It felt bigger, more energetic. With this point in mind, I'd still rather have districts. For the same price, you get 2 events, AND you get more plays at each of those events than a regional.
Let's try not to turn this thread into another districts debate.

Chris is me 26-07-2016 09:30
EDITED THE TITLE OF THIS POST
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sperkowsky (Post 1598418)
You can if it's within 24 hours just edit then go to advanced.
You can edit the title of a POST, but not a thread. I don't think it shows up as the thread title even if you edit it after the fact.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:12.
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi