Chief Delphi

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)
-   Rumor Mill (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=15)
-   -   Motors (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=14972)

AdamT 02-11-2002 19:52

Motors
 
So, since we know that there will be a change up in motors, what motors will be gone, and what will replace them??

mtaman02 02-11-2002 20:18

i here that chalupa's might stay and the drills are going due to the fact that bosch is no longer making that model. this info was posted earlier in the season on CD so search through one of the motor threads i'm sure theres a hint there

AdamT 02-11-2002 20:23

(shhhh) I know this, I just want to see if anyone has some crazy ideas like making every bot drive off of the johnson motors we got last year.....:D

Joe Ross 03-11-2002 15:40

We've had two or three different versions of drill motors in the 6 years that I've participated. I think that they will stay (assuming FIRST's supplier doesn't stop donationg) as they are still the easiest to hook up for a simple drive train.

Rob Colatutto 03-11-2002 16:04

from what i heard, atwood in, new bosch model

dlavery 03-11-2002 17:03

From what I have heard, there won't be any motors (Chiaphuas, Johnsons, Boschs, or anything else) in the kits. Instead, we will get a box containining 144 servos, modified for continuous rotation (like the ones in the EduRobotics kits). The trick will be to figure out how to gang 47 of them onto one shaft for the drive systems!

-dave

----------------------------------------------

My mind goes numb.

Ragin_Kage 03-11-2002 17:13

Quote:

From what I have heard, there won't be any motors (Chiaphuas, Johnsons, Boschs, or anything else) in the kits.
I heard that they were sending a live crate with some hamsters in it

by only having one previous year experiance i cant really take a guess, but i was happy with our drill motor configuration, even though we had a drill/atwood trans, that never got working how we wanted it, we just took them off...I cant wait to get that big box of parts!

Adam Y. 03-11-2002 19:07

Quote:

From what I have heard, there won't be any motors (Chiaphuas, Johnsons, Boschs, or anything else) in the kits.
Yeah this years challenge is to build a walking machine that doesn't use motors!!!!! Im just kidding. Of course what else could we do if we had no motors.

Madison 03-11-2002 19:13

Quote:

Originally posted by wysiswyg

Yeah this years challenge is to build a walking machine that doesn't use motors!!!!! Im just kidding. Of course what else could we do if we had no motors.

You can make stuff move with pistons, y'know.

sanddrag 03-11-2002 19:14

We could have all pneumatic power of course there is a motor in the compressor.

All in favor of using lawnmower engines raise hand.

/me raises hand.

Katie Reynolds 03-11-2002 19:17

Quote:

Originally posted by sanddrag
We could have all pneumatic power of course there is a motor in the compressor.

All in favor of using lawnmower engines raise hand.

/me raises hand.

Oooh, you beat me to it! That's what I was going to say! ;)

- Katie

Adam Y. 03-11-2002 19:26

Quote:

You can make stuff move with pistons, y'know.
Errr yeah that what i was implying. It really wouldn't make much sense to try and make the wheels of a robot move with linear motion. If I had to I would go and build a legged machine. Inertia labs uses a motor that uses pneumatics as its power supply but... its really dumb for our purposes.

Madison 03-11-2002 20:24

1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally posted by wysiswyg

It really wouldn't make much sense to try and make the wheels of a robot move with linear motion.

Meet my friend the steam locomotive.

MacZealot 03-11-2002 20:27

wouldn't that really be tough on the battery?

Why not make a robot that can generate it's own energy off it's momentum?/movement?

sanddrag 03-11-2002 20:36

Quote:

Originally posted by MacZealot
Why not make a robot that can generate it's own energy off it's momentum?/movement?
That would work only if you had 100% efficiency. It would never be that efficient.

I still say go with lawnmower engines, or at least weedwacker ones.

Tom Schindler 03-11-2002 20:44

Quote:

Originally posted by sanddrag


That would work only if you had 100% efficiency. It would never be that efficient.

I still say go with lawnmower engines, or at least weedwacker ones.

theres a small problem here - what happens when you want to change directions with a weedwacker or lawnmower engine - are you going to devise some sort of clutch and gearshift mechanism? i hope not. I'll take my nice drill motors :)

Tom

sanddrag 03-11-2002 20:52

Quote:

Originally posted by Tom Schindler


theres a small problem here - what happens when you want to change directions with a weedwacker or lawnmower engine - are you going to devise some sort of clutch and gearshift mechanism? i hope not. I'll take my nice drill motors :)

Tom

Well, you would have to have clutches on each engine no matter what so you are not moving all the time. As for switching directions, you would have an engine for each side of the robot right? So, in your transmission, you would have to have an extra gear on each side that is put into the driveline when desired to reverse the direction of rotation. Or you could have steering brakes but you still couldn't go backwards. Hmmm.

MacZealot 03-11-2002 20:54

Quote:

Originally posted by Tom Schindler


theres a small problem here - what happens when you want to change directions with a weedwacker or lawnmower engine - are you going to devise some sort of clutch and gearshift mechanism? i hope not. I'll take my nice drill motors :)

Tom

When you want to change directions with a weedwacker or lawnmower engine, NOTE, you only have 1 motor, and perhaps the rear axle gets the power (or front),

either way, then you have to find a way to turn the front or back wheels of the bot to steer :)

WHICH PROBABLY CAN BE DONE WITH PNEUMATICS (BUT IT WILL BE SLOW)

mtaman02 03-11-2002 21:15

Quote:




quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by sanddrag
We could have all pneumatic power of course there is a motor in the compressor.

All in favor of using lawnmower engines raise hand.

/me raises hand.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Oooh, you beat me to it! That's what I was going to say!

- Katie

I second this motion

Me got a lawnmower. Anyone got Gas

sanddrag 03-11-2002 21:33

Quote:

Originally posted by Mike522


I second this motion

At this point I'd like to call the question. Who is in favor of ending debate and taking a vote?

Quote:

Originally posted by MacZealot


When you want to change directions with a weedwacker or lawnmower engine, NOTE, you only have 1 motor, and perhaps the rear axle gets the power (or front),

either way, then you have to find a way to turn the front or back wheels of the bot to steer :)

WHICH PROBABLY CAN BE DONE WITH PNEUMATICS (BUT IT WILL BE SLOW)

Oh yeah, pneumatics. That would be perfect for steering, except you can't make a pneumatic piston stop half-way. Perhaps hydraulics? I would go rack and pinion but the idear is to not have any motors.

Adam Y. 04-11-2002 15:19

Chooo choooo...... Chuga Chuga Choo... Chooo.... If I had to pick between a robotic train and a walking machine I pick the cool machine that walks.

Madison 04-11-2002 19:10

Quote:

Originally posted by sanddrag
Oh yeah, pneumatics. That would be perfect for steering, except you can't make a pneumatic piston stop half-way.
Yes, you can.

I didn't discover this trade-secret, though, so I'll leave it to the team that knows to share it - if they're inclined.

But, it can be done.

Jnadke 04-11-2002 20:14

Quote:

Originally posted by M. Krass


Yes, you can.

I didn't discover this trade-secret, though, so I'll leave it to the team that knows to share it - if they're inclined.

But, it can be done.


Yeah, but it required some pneumatics part that was offered in 2001...

It wasn't in the 2002 kit... if it was there, I'm sure people could have figured out how to make it stop half way. Believe me, I did our pneumatics this year, and short of cutting off the air supply (squeezing the tube), there isn't any viable way of cutting the air flow to the cylinders.


The guy from the team who figured this out told me at the beginning of the build that the part isn't available in the kit...

Rob Colatutto 04-11-2002 22:13

our 2001 bot could stop the piston where ever we wanted, and believe me, the parts were in the 2002 kit

evulish 04-11-2002 22:38

I want to see someone make a hovercraft bot...I doubt our little pumps could hold one up, though (much less allow me to ride on it :D)

Rob Colatutto 04-11-2002 22:42

Quote:

Originally posted by evulish
I want to see someone make a hovercraft bot...I doubt our little pumps could hold one up, though (much less allow me to ride on it :D)
we made a hovercraft last year with a really big muffin fan, the one in the kit. it worked for about 2 minutes, and then fell apart

Dan 550 06-11-2002 22:26

Krass, we need to talk...
 
eMail me here within the neighborhood of soon so as we can discuss our ideas again. Thanks, Michael.

Jnadke 07-11-2002 02:15

Quote:

Originally posted by Nataku
our 2001 bot could stop the piston where ever we wanted, and believe me, the parts were in the 2002 kit
Well, one way would be to use 2 solenoids...

One solenoid would be always on to fill, and would only be used to let air out.

The other solenoid would be in serial after the first one and would be used as a control valve. The release port would be plugged...

EStokely 20-11-2002 18:18

OK one more vote for a lawn mower engine, and hydraulics!

But I will bet up to and including 25 cents on Drill motors still being with us.

I'll bet another quarter that I will NEVER again try to build a drive train that doesn't actually move by the 5th week. (third week...maybe)

Eric Stokely

Elgin Clock 21-11-2002 17:44

Quote:

Originally posted by Nataku


we made a hovercraft last year with a really big muffin fan, the one in the kit. it worked for about 2 minutes, and then fell apart

How in the world did you manage to pull that off??? Those fans, no matter what size, don't even have enough power to lift themselves off the ground!!!

Trust me, I tried. I had like 15 of them from this summer's big bargain up in FIRST land!

sanddrag 21-11-2002 18:58

I believe he was referring to a model hovercraft with a rubber or plastic skirt. It would fill up with somewhat compressed air lifting the device off the ground.

No?

Travis Hoffman 22-11-2002 17:21

Quote:

Originally posted by Elgin Clock


How in the world did you manage to pull that off??? Those fans, no matter what size, don't even have enough power to lift themselves off the ground!!!

Trust me, I tried. I had like 15 of them from this summer's big bargain up in FIRST land!


Try an alternative power source - some of our kids pointed an air gun hooked to a big honkin' compressor at the fan blades and fired away. The result was quite entertaining, although half of the people in the woodshop had to hit the deck.... :-P

Tim_Wochomurka 04-12-2002 21:58

I seem to remember something about combustable fuels being a no go...

ahecht 04-12-2002 22:15

Back on topic here, my sources tell me that the Chiapuah (Atwood) motor will return, but it will be a different model with a more standard gear pitch on the output shaft.

The drill motor will return unchanged, but we will have a new model of transmission (with 4 planetary gears instead of 3).

I do admit, however, that a box of hamsters would be nice.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:03.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi