Chief Delphi

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)
-   Extra Discussion (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=68)
-   -   pic: Another Swerve (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=149779)

SerpentEagle 08-02-2016 07:41 AM

pic: Another Swerve
 

ratdude747 08-02-2016 07:43 AM

Re: pic: Another Swerve
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by SerpentEagle (Post 1599380)

Looks a bit hollow... You'll want a belly pan or the like to stiffen the frame (otherwise you'll have a lot of flex).

marshall 08-02-2016 08:35 AM

Re: pic: Another Swerve
 
Is there a speed encoder on there? I see one for turning... which i think is 1:1.

Source files? This looks cool.

cad321 08-02-2016 09:27 AM

Re: pic: Another Swerve
 
That lightening pattern on the gearboxes look a little too pocketed to me. I'd probably add a little more meat to them there. Aside from that I like it. And as ratdude said, you'll want a belly pan for added rigidity.

asid61 08-02-2016 11:16 AM

Re: pic: Another Swerve
 
The gearbox pattern might be a little too much, but given the layout it's probably not fatal. The main thing I would do with that is make the webs going to the big pivot larger (5/16" or even 3/8" wide).

The chassis looks fine to my eyes. The pattern is similar to 971's patterns this year, and didn't decrease stiffness noticeable last time I checked in simulation. Given the large square shape, however, adding a wooden bellypan would be to your advantage.

Basel A 08-02-2016 12:28 PM

Re: pic: Another Swerve
 
I would be concerned about having the CIM there so near to the ground. In a game with some field obstacles, you could probably rearrange a couple things and move the CIM to the top plate (through the bottom plate). There are several disadvantages (higher CG, cantilevered gears, etc.), but could be necessary.

Cothron Theiss 08-02-2016 12:32 PM

Re: pic: Another Swerve
 
What is the reduction and fps on that? It appears to be quite zippy, given that I can only see two reductions, neither of which are very extreme.

SerpentEagle 08-02-2016 01:13 PM

Re: pic: Another Swerve
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ratdude747 (Post 1599381)
Looks a bit hollow... You'll want a belly pan or the like to stiffen the frame (otherwise you'll have a lot of flex).

Yeah, I plan to add one in the end.
Quote:

Originally Posted by marshall (Post 1599388)
Is there a speed encoder on there? I see one for turning... which i think is 1:1.

Source files? This looks cool.

Yeah, theres a versa planetary encoder for the turning. Haven't added the drive encoders. I was only a couple hours into this.

Ill upload this to grabcad later on. Thanks.
Quote:

Originally Posted by cad321 (Post 1599391)
That lightening pattern on the gearboxes look a little too pocketed to me. I'd probably add a little more meat to them there. Aside from that I like it. And as ratdude said, you'll want a belly pan for added rigidity.

Quote:

Originally Posted by asid61 (Post 1599404)
The gearbox pattern might be a little too much, but given the layout it's probably not fatal. The main thing I would do with that is make the webs going to the big pivot larger (5/16" or even 3/8" wide).

The chassis looks fine to my eyes. The pattern is similar to 971's patterns this year, and didn't decrease stiffness noticeable last time I checked in simulation. Given the large square shape, however, adding a wooden bellypan would be to your advantage.

Agreed
Quote:

Originally Posted by Basel A (Post 1599412)
I would be concerned about having the CIM there so near to the ground. In a game with some field obstacles, you could probably rearrange a couple things and move the CIM to the top plate (through the bottom plate). There are several disadvantages (higher CG, cantilevered gears, etc.), but could be necessary.

This is designed to be an offseason project, so this is assuming a flat field, like in 2014.
Quote:

Originally Posted by Cothron Theiss (Post 1599413)
What is the reduction and fps on that? It appears to be quite zippy, given that I can only see two reductions, neither of which are very extreme.

Its 1:3.333 with a 3.25 OD wheel. Aroud 18 fps according to JVN's calculator. This is designed for an offseason project, so it wont weight more than 45-50 lbs. I might slow it down a bit later on.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:19 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi