![]() |
FIRST vs Free Speech
Flash back to March 3, 2016. My team (which will remain anonymous) was participating in the San Diego regional for FIRST Stronghold. All was well until a FIRST Volunteer pulled me aside while I was in the pits. He took issue with the political statement my clothing made and didn't let me back inside the pits until I changed. For reference, this is what I had on.
He told me he would've "let it slide" if it were any old other pair, but not with THAT person on them. He was Hispanic as well, I'm just including that because it's relevant information and he might have been discriminatory towards me because of that (I was wearing a button that said "BUILD THE WALL!" as well, courtesy of our button maker.) His behavior left an absolutely rotten taste in my mouth and a lot of people on my team are concerned that this shows FIRST is leaning towards an Anti-Free Speech position. This seems really counter-intuitive considering FRC is supposed to help prepare you better for going into the real world; when you see somebody with an opinion you don't share, you can't just make them go away; you either talk it out, or you ignore that person. FIRST Volunteers should exemplify good behavior, not throw it out the window. Also, if the moderators close this thread because it's 'uncomfortable,' then I guess we all know where they stand on free speech and open discussion. |
Re: FIRST vs Free Speech
Play stupid games, win stupid prizes. Wear closed-toed shoes next time.
|
Re: FIRST vs Free Speech
Quote:
|
Re: FIRST vs Free Speech
I actually think this a good topic to bring up. I've gone into pits dozens of times without wearing safety glasses similar to the OP walking past the volunteers without wearing closed-toed shoes. Do we need to do more to ensure the safety rule are being enforced by the volunteers at the pit entrances?
|
Re: FIRST vs Free Speech
(If I were in that position, I would be more concerned about the fact that they are flip-flops than what they say)
I don't think it's fair for you to take what this one volunteer said and try to pin it on FIRST as a whole. That's just not fair at all. That being said, I think the volunteer was overstepping his job description. I would have taken it up with the volunteer coordinator. |
Re: FIRST vs Free Speech
The link takes me to a pair of flip flops, which might be a safety issue if you are wearing them into the pits. He probably saw them and was going to comment on how is a safety hazard and noticed the design and commented on how he disapproved of the candidate. How did he see what they said if you were wearing them?
I don't think that FIRST is anti-free speech, but that the volunteer just had a different opinion than you did. |
Re: FIRST vs Free Speech
What one volunteer does, does not necessarily reflect the opinions of FIRST. Any person can volunteer at an FRC event. They get a little training and are thrown into whatever position they applied for. Its also worth mentioning what position this volunteer was in? Were they a safety adviser?
Next time just wear closed toe shoes. If you have issues with a volunteer talk to the volunteer coordinator. With thousands of volunteers someone is bound to overstep their position. Its not FIRST's fault. |
Re: FIRST vs Free Speech
Quote:
|
Re: FIRST vs Free Speech
First of all, I'm sorry you had that experience. In the future, you should speak to a planning committee member and ask to speak to the Volunteer Coordinator. There's many ways they could handle the issue, including filing a Non Medical Incident Report, which gets handled by HQ after the event.
I'm surprised that you had flip flops on in the pit, more than anything. If the volunteer wouldn't let you back in because of the safety issue, that would make sense, but I agree the angle the volunteer took was not the best one. |
Re: FIRST vs Free Speech
Quote:
|
Re: FIRST vs Free Speech
I mean absolutely no disrespect towards the OP or her/his political beliefs, but I personally believe that what her/his button said goes against what FIRST stands for. I believe that FIRST strives for breaking down barriers and uniting people despite their differences, and wanting to build walls goes against that. Perhaps the volunteer that the OP mentioned felt the same way about what the OP was wearing.
|
Re: FIRST vs Free Speech
Quote:
|
Re: FIRST vs Free Speech
Quote:
|
Re: FIRST vs Free Speech
Quote:
|
Re: FIRST vs Free Speech
Quote:
|
Re: FIRST vs Free Speech
Quote:
|
Re: FIRST vs Free Speech
Quote:
|
Re: FIRST vs Free Speech
I think it best to keep political opinions to ourselves because then instances like this happen when people have conflicting views.
|
Re: FIRST vs Free Speech
Quote:
|
Re: FIRST vs Free Speech
Quote:
Talking about political views is a TERRIBLE idea here and frankly inappropriate. You are either a newly created Anon account or a first time CD user. If this is your first time here trust me in telling you a political discussion will turn sour very quickly. |
Re: FIRST vs Free Speech
Hang on, how did this volunteer even see the political message on the flip-flops if you were wearing them?
|
Re: FIRST vs Free Speech
Quote:
|
Re: FIRST vs Free Speech
Quote:
In all seriousness though, that sounds like a volunteer problem and not a FIRST problem, as others above have said. That being said, wearing political clothing at comps is a little sketchy in general IMO, because competitions are a professional setting where you represent your team. But if your team is ok with it, as long as it's not blatantly offensive there's no point in making it an issue. Quote:
![]() |
Re: FIRST vs Free Speech
Quote:
But now everybody on here is telling me to hush-hush with how I believe this volunteer was behaving inappropriately, and surely everyone on here is part of the FIRST community. So now a group of people representative of the FIRST community are also trying to squash free speech. Doesn't this just prove exactly what I was claiming in the original post? |
Re: FIRST vs Free Speech
Quote:
|
Re: FIRST vs Free Speech
Quote:
No because he was commenting on having non-closed toe shoes on and had a differing opinion. That how I see it but others may see it differently. |
Re: FIRST vs Free Speech
Quote:
|
Re: FIRST vs Free Speech
Quote:
For one to be against free-speech, they don't have to be deleting posts and censoring information. The minimum criteria is that they express that they are against it. For example, if you were to say "I don't support free speech, and I don't think you should bring certain discussion here," you wouldn't be censoring me, but you would certainly be against free speech. After all, you would've said it. |
Re: FIRST vs Free Speech
I got two questions for you:
1. Are you secretly affiliated with bad lard (some secret Bad Lard Coalition or something)? and 2. What do you think about free speech in FRC China? Warm Regards, Smiti ::safety:: |
Re: FIRST vs Free Speech
Quote:
|
Re: FIRST vs Free Speech
Quote:
|
Re: FIRST vs Free Speech
FYI, free speech in the U.S. just means you won't be prosecuted for what you say*. It doesn't mean people have to agree with you or even tolerate you. HTH.
|
Re: FIRST vs Free Speech
Quote:
|
Re: FIRST vs Free Speech
Quote:
|
Re: FIRST vs Free Speech
Quote:
|
Re: FIRST vs Free Speech
Quote:
|
Re: FIRST vs Free Speech
Quote:
If you have time to try and further a political belief at an FRC event, you clearly aren't busy enough and should focus on doing more for your team. Just sayin. |
Re: FIRST vs Free Speech
Quote:
|
Re: FIRST vs Free Speech
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:51. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi