Chief Delphi

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)
-   Technical Discussion (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=22)
-   -   Versaplanetary Output Direction (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=150470)

feverittm 24-08-2016 22:04

Versaplanetary Output Direction
 
I am going to change a question that might be a major Duh! moment.

Given a Versa Planetary with three stages a 5:1, a second 5;1, and a third 4:1 to make 100:1.

Now during competition season the ring gear on our 4:1 broke. For offseason repairs we replaced the 4:1 with a 3:1 and therefore we now have net 75:1 after repairs.

Now a question. Should we expect the direction of the output shaft to reverse with the change from 4:1 to 3:1?

I don't think so because that's not how planetary gears work. But I have been know to be wrong.

Thanks!

Jay O'Donnell 24-08-2016 22:06

Re: Versaplanetary Output Direction
 
Your assumption is correct. The output shaft will turn the same direction.

ollien 24-08-2016 22:09

Re: Versaplanetary Output Direction
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jay O'Donnell (Post 1602759)
Your assumption is correct. The output shaft will turn the same direction.


Is there any situation, short of running the motor the other way, where a VP would turn the other way?

Jay O'Donnell 24-08-2016 22:10

Re: Versaplanetary Output Direction
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ollien (Post 1602760)
Is there any situation, short of running the motor the other way, where a VP would turn the other way?

No. All of the stages turn the same direction, regardless of how many there are or what gear ratio they are.

Max Boord 24-08-2016 22:11

Re: Versaplanetary Output Direction
 
The output direction should not change. Just out of curiosity why did you run 3 stages to get a 100:1 reduction when you could have done it in 2 and saved the space, weight, and money the additional stage?

ollien 24-08-2016 22:12

Re: Versaplanetary Output Direction
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Max Boord (Post 1602763)
The output direction should not change. Just out of curiosity why did you run 3 stages to get a 100:1 reduction when you could have done it in 2 and saved the space, weight, and money the additional stage?

Correct me if I'm wrong, but the 5 5 4 will be less prone to breakage than the 10 10.

asid61 24-08-2016 22:16

Re: Versaplanetary Output Direction
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jay O'Donnell (Post 1602762)
No. All of the stages turn the same direction, regardless of how many there are or what gear ratio they are.

To add onto this, the reason why this is true is because the VPs use the carrier plate as the output. In a planetary gearset where the ring gear is held still (like the VPs) the carrier plate will turn in the same direction as the pinion. Thus, no direction change.

Chris is me 25-08-2016 10:09

Re: Versaplanetary Output Direction
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Max Boord (Post 1602763)
The output direction should not change. Just out of curiosity why did you run 3 stages to get a 100:1 reduction when you could have done it in 2 and saved the space, weight, and money the additional stage?

The 3-stage version is stronger - check the load ratings document to see how strength improves with more stages. That tiny 10:1 pinion can't take as much abuse as the 3:1 or 4:1 stage can.

Anupam Goli 25-08-2016 16:49

Re: Versaplanetary Output Direction
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris is me (Post 1602876)
The 3-stage version is stronger - check the load ratings document to see how strength improves with more stages. That tiny 10:1 pinion can't take as much abuse as the 3:1 or 4:1 stage can.

Although the 3 stage 100:1 reduction is stronger, it is more inefficient than a 100:1 using two 10:1 stages, right?

Max Boord 25-08-2016 17:24

Re: Versaplanetary Output Direction
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Anupam Goli (Post 1602948)
Although the 3 stage 100:1 reduction is stronger, it is more inefficient than a 100:1 using two 10:1 stages, right?

Correct. it is also worth noting that the 10:1 carrier plate fails at 100 N-M while a stalled 775pro with a 100:1 reduction will develop only 71 N-M at stall neglecting the inefficiencies of the stages needed to develop the 100:1 reduction. in other words, unless you use the dual input stage or use a motor and gearbox combination not recommended by vexpro it should not be possible to develop the torque necessary to break the ring gear on a VP.

Also as someone who managed to accidentally stall a 775pro into a 100 to 1 versa (10:1 and 10:1) this season, I can attest that the 775pro will fail before the versa will.

AdamHeard 25-08-2016 18:06

Re: Versaplanetary Output Direction
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Max Boord (Post 1602954)
Correct. it is also worth noting that the 10:1 carrier plate fails at 100 N-M while a stalled 775pro with a 100:1 reduction will develop only 71 N-M at stall neglecting the inefficiencies of the stages needed to develop the 100:1 reduction. in other words, unless you use the dual input stage or use a motor and gearbox combination not recommended by vexpro it should not be possible to develop the torque necessary to break the ring gear on a VP.

Also as someone who managed to accidentally stall a 775pro into a 100 to 1 versa (10:1 and 10:1) this season, I can attest that the 775pro will fail before the versa will.

You're able to develop more than the stall torque in FRC in two likely cases;

1) Reversing the voltage of the motor while still travling the other direction, this will results in a larger voltage across the motor than 12V, and generate higher torques (it stops being linear after the magnets saturate, unsure when that point is).

2) Dynamic and shock loads can cause brief torque spikes above the stall torque of the motor.

Unfortunately the above two make system sizing to avoid failure a little trickier, and for those reasons I would want to stay a good deal inside the Vexpro published ratings for the versaplanetaries to guarantee they keep running smoothly.

Voltage ramping (limiting the instantaneous rate of change of the speed controller output) can help alleviate the above two, but at the cost of acceleration time (likely negligible in most designs).

That being said, 330 has run them in quite large (but within spec) reductions the last two seasons on nearly all their systems with good success. I'm unsure if they do any voltage ramping or other tricks.

ollien 25-08-2016 18:36

Re: Versaplanetary Output Direction
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Max Boord (Post 1602954)
Correct. it is also worth noting that the 10:1 carrier plate fails at 100 N-M while a stalled 775pro with a 100:1 reduction will develop only 71 N-M at stall neglecting the inefficiencies of the stages needed to develop the 100:1 reduction. in other words, unless you use the dual input stage or use a motor and gearbox combination not recommended by vexpro it should not be possible to develop the torque necessary to break the ring gear on a VP.

Also as someone who managed to accidentally stall a 775pro into a 100 to 1 versa (10:1 and 10:1) this season, I can attest that the 775pro will fail before the versa will.

Where is the 100 N-M stat located? From what I see, the load rating guide only includes safe ratios.

Or are you calculating the torque from the safe ratio?

Max Boord 25-08-2016 20:01

Re: Versaplanetary Output Direction
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ollien (Post 1602961)
Where is the 100 N-M stat located?

The 100 N-M number is from page 13 of this sheet. Im assuming that the 1/2 inch hex or round shaft is being used causing the weakest link to be the carrier plate as the shaft fails at above the force the carrier plate can withstand.

troy_dietz 25-08-2016 20:37

Re: Versaplanetary Output Direction
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by AdamHeard (Post 1602958)

Voltage ramping (limiting the instantaneous rate of change of the speed controller output) can help alleviate the above two, but at the cost of acceleration time (likely negligible in most designs).

That being said, 330 has run them in quite large (but within spec) reductions the last two seasons on nearly all their systems with good success. I'm unsure if they do any voltage ramping or other tricks.

The voltage on our arm motors is ramped. The motors are redundant, but we would likely have issues with our srimech if one was missing.

We have had issues with the carrier pins coming out occasionally, we're planning on welding them in place.

Since 2014, all of our arm VP's have led to an 5:1 chain reduction (the large yellow sprocket). I believe 2013 has a double chain reduction.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 18:15.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi