[FIRST EMAIL] Stop Build Day Survey
 

I received this email today:

Re: [FIRST EMAIL] Stop Build Day Survey
 

Marshal? Here is your chance.

Re: [FIRST EMAIL] Stop Build Day Survey
 

If I'm a coach and didn't receive the survey, should we A) fill it out and give them more data or B) not fill it out since we're not a part of the population they want to sample?

Re: [FIRST EMAIL] Stop Build Day Survey
 

This poll is bad and it should feel bad.

Seriously though, it is very poorly written and the way the choices are laid out does not make a lot of sense. I question whether the data they get back will even mean anything given that.

Re: [FIRST EMAIL] Stop Build Day Survey
 

:yikes: :yikes: :yikes: :yikes: :yikes:

Re: [FIRST EMAIL] Stop Build Day Survey
 

Agreed. I had to read through the first questions a couple times just to understand what they meant. The whole advantage and disadvantage answers just don't seem to fit with what they are asking. At least the Remove stop build day and keep it as is answers will be useful.

Re: [FIRST EMAIL] Stop Build Day Survey
 

Based on this line, I'd say anyone over the age of 13 is invited to fill it out:

Re: [FIRST EMAIL] Stop Build Day Survey
 

+1

Re: [FIRST EMAIL] Stop Build Day Survey
 

Yes.

"Is having 6 weeks a disadvantage to a whole bunch of stuff?" Of course.

"Are those disadvantages outweighed by the life lessons and playing field it enables?" Up to the reader, and the real question they should be seeking to qualify and quantify.

As another poster pointed out, the last couple questions at least hit that key at a high level. Doubt they will get useful data from the rest.

Re: [FIRST EMAIL] Stop Build Day Survey
 

I thought the questions were laid out almost as a way to inform the general public (i.e. - a larger group of people than the CD echo chamber) about the pros and cons of the bag day rather than really collecting information on it. I found the survey to be a little confusing and that the first page seemed a little biased - but I think it's interesting they sent a survey out at all.

Re: [FIRST EMAIL] Stop Build Day Survey
 

+2

Re: [FIRST EMAIL] Stop Build Day Survey
 

The way I read it, low numbers meant you didn't like bag day. It seems a little late to be making this decision for 2017.

I issue I see with eliminating bag day is doing something rational with spares at the competition. Or maybe not. With only allowing 30 lbs of fabricated spares, no one will be bringing in a spare robot.

Keep in mind that First does monitor these threads. At time it seems to influence their thinking.

Re: [FIRST EMAIL] Stop Build Day Survey
 

If bag day is eliminated, then why would they keep a withholding? I would think that would go away completely and they would come up with some definition of "second robot" to say "don't bring this" instead.

Re: [FIRST EMAIL] Stop Build Day Survey
 

That would be too broad of a definition IMO. One would keep withholding to prevent massive robot-sized mods to their robots. Withholding could stay, thus forcing a lot of teams to do nothing more than driver practice once they hit that 30lb limit.

EDIT: Wait, how would withholding even work? Ignore me, I'm being weird- they would have to remove witholding allowance. That does create the problem of totally new robots, but I doubt many teams will do anything more significant than they are already doing. After all, if they wanted to copy, say, 254's robot, they would have to do it in just a few weeks and get all their driver practice in too while other teams are just busy practicing the whole time.

Re: [FIRST EMAIL] Stop Build Day Survey
 

First and foremost, the survey is terrible. The questions are incredibly confusing, and abstracting any data out of it should be done carefully.

Secondly, bag day, though a challenge is part of the larger one. Having only 6 weeks to build a robot is a very looming challenge, the stop build timer counting down like an evil overlord. To me though, it's part of the fun (or lack thereof when I'm asked 3.5ish months from now.)

However, if they were to remove bag day, you get into the whole Ship of Theseus problem of "if they change every part of their robot, is it still the same robot?" Where is the line drawn between "improvements" and "totally different" robot?

I digress, the survey stunk, and should FIRST want better information, the questions should be worded to make more sense. We may be roboticists, but we're not all rocket scientists. :P