Chief Delphi

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)
-   General Forum (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   FIRST Server Issues (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=151492)

notmattlythgoe 22-09-2016 12:50

Re: Registration 2017
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by JesseK (Post 1608419)
The only purpose us old people see for a hashtag is to filter out the aimless noise that is actually Twitter. Personally, I don't filter on any of those other hashtags.

#sorrywearepostpoingregistrationuntilnextweek

tjwolter 22-09-2016 12:50

Re: Registration 2017
 
Not seeing it on Facebook and no email as of 11:54 Central...

Gary Dillard 22-09-2016 12:51

Re: Registration 2017
 
I finally got all the way in to the event registration, but it still says event registration not open yet, so it won't let me register.

synth3tk 22-09-2016 12:52

Re: Registration 2017
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by bcampbell (Post 1608415)
Anyone else annoyed by the hastag on FRCTeams twitter.... #OMGROBOTS.... They should have said something like #SORRY or #MYBAD or #WHOOPS

It's for visibility. Some people are probably watching that hashtag for spicy memes or updates on the situation.

gsesny 22-09-2016 12:53

Re: Registration 2017
 
For the sake of being fair I hope they do a reset. I as have all of you have scheduled my day around this. I can't hit refresh over and over and over again all day. Although my students wouldn't mind :)

iyportne 22-09-2016 12:53

Re: Registration 2017
 
I know this is unfortunate, but as a continuous improvement professional I know none of us have gotten to where we are without backward steps, and I trust FIRST will fix and make good on this process as well.

My bigger concern now is tempering the attitude of my students who may be reading this thread. Some may come away with the idea we should never try new things and take risks to move forward and just keep doing what we are to avoid ridicule should things go wrong.

Remember, everyone can predict something that just happened, and everyone can solve an isolated issue without the entire context.

Perhaps we can use this thread as a case study for Gracious Professionalism vs. Ungracious Pro-victimism...heaven known we have the evening news for the latter.

mastachyra 22-09-2016 12:54

Re: Registration 2017
 
I just read it on Chief Delphi guys... Postponed until next week!

mjenk72 22-09-2016 12:55

Re: Registration 2017
 
They transfer registration duties to me this year and what happens....https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=...74649774519171

jgerstein 22-09-2016 12:57

Re: Registration 2017
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by marshall (Post 1608348)
Why is this a free for all instead of a lottery system?

Either way, my hat is off to the FIRST IT staff handling the fire right now. I hope Frank and Dean sponsor a party for you after this is resolved.

Agreed. Some of my fellow mentors and I were talking about this yesterday. The high-pressure free for all isn't ideal, even without crashes, because it forces people to rearrange their schedule for the day around it. For some people that ranges from difficult to impossible.

Adding in crashes like this makes it so much worse, because instead of planning my day around something that will take a few minutes, I have to plan around something that will take a completely unknown amount of time.

mjenk72 22-09-2016 12:57

Re: Registration 2017
 
aaaand that worked almost as well as registration did...

Andrew Schreiber 22-09-2016 12:58

Re: Registration 2017
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by iyportne (Post 1608425)
I know this is unfortunate, but as a continuous improvement professional I know none of us have gotten to where we are without backward steps, and I trust FIRST will fix and make good on this process as well.

My bigger concern now is tempering the attitude of my students who may be reading this thread. Some may come away with the idea we should never try new things and take risks to move forward and just keep doing what we are to avoid ridicule should things go wrong.

Remember, everyone can predict something that just happened, and everyone can solve an isolated issue without the entire context.

Perhaps we can use this thread as a case study for Gracious Professionalism vs. Ungracious Pro-victimism...heaven known we have the evening news for the latter.


Ok, here's one directed just for your students.


Absolutely, try new things. But when you launch what is effectively a product or service be sure to test it under expected load.

Abrakadabra 22-09-2016 13:02

Re: Registration 2017
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by iyportne (Post 1608425)
...
My bigger concern now is tempering the attitude of my students who may be reading this thread. Some may come away with the idea we should never try new things and take risks to move forward and just keep doing what we are to avoid ridicule should things go wrong.
...

Or... perhaps they will learn that when you have a "mission critical" system (which I would argue is true in this case, with the large number of professional man-hours being wasted due to its non-functionality), and that system had been working just fine for the past two years, if you decide to change it for whatever reason, it might be a good idea to test the heck out of it before bringing it live.

kmckay 22-09-2016 13:02

Re: Registration 2017
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by bcampbell (Post 1608415)
Anyone else annoyed by the hastag on FRCTeams twitter.... #OMGROBOTS.... They should have said something like #SORRY or #MYBAD or #WHOOPS

#WeFiredTheGuysWhoUpdatedTheWebsite

FrankJ 22-09-2016 13:04

Re: Registration 2017
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by iyportne (Post 1608425)
My bigger concern now is tempering the attitude of my students who may be reading this thread. Some may come away with the idea we should never try new things and take risks to move forward and just keep doing what we are to avoid ridicule should things go wrong.

I agree name calling is pointless. But. First has data on resource loading registration takes. It happens every year. First choice crashed First Choice the first time up. I expect it has similar loading. You try new things, but you mitigate the risks and test for known issues.

AllenGregoryIV 22-09-2016 13:04

Re: Registration 2017
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Andrew Schreiber (Post 1608431)
Absolutely, try new things. But when you launch what is effectively a product or service be sure to test it under expected load.

And this isn't a new problem, HQ has been dealing with this for years. Registration used to have problems years ago and they worked through them. FIRST Choice used to have problems and they worked throw those as well. Even now they have testing sessions and things to make sure their servers were ready for that. They have done much better in the past and this is clearly a step backwards, we aren't expecting them to be perfect but they could also provide far better service to their customers and not wait 45 mins before making any public update.

Andrew Schreiber 22-09-2016 13:04

Re: Registration 2017
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by kmckay (Post 1608433)
#WeFiredTheGuysWhoUpdatedTheWebsite

I hope not. Screw ups are a part of life.

BrendanB 22-09-2016 13:04

Re: Registration 2017
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by iyportne (Post 1608425)
I know this is unfortunate, but as a continuous improvement professional I know none of us have gotten to where we are without backward steps, and I trust FIRST will fix and make good on this process as well.

My bigger concern now is tempering the attitude of my students who may be reading this thread. Some may come away with the idea we should never try new things and take risks to move forward and just keep doing what we are to avoid ridicule should things go wrong.

Remember, everyone can predict something that just happened, and everyone can solve an isolated issue without the entire context.

Perhaps we can use this thread as a case study for Gracious Professionalism vs. Ungracious Pro-victimism...heaven known we have the evening news for the latter.

This is true however FIRST has had a long history of having teams use systems that just crash. FIRST Choice & Registration threads of old have had many issues with crashing & struggling to handle the load. The TIMs system was working just fine over the past few years and the decision was made to change it so yes teams are going to be upset that FIRST took a step backwards after finding something that was working fine.

Its a little disappointing but when it requires people to set aside time out of their work day to sit around and get nothing accomplished.

SGK 22-09-2016 13:04

Re: Registration 2017
 
My source with contacts at FRC HQ has told me "Officially postponed until next week. Date and Times TBA"

Banderoonies 22-09-2016 13:06

Re: Registration 2017
 
11 years doing this....registration has NEVER worked as it should. Even with this new and improved website... *sigh*. #highhopescrushed

RoboTigers1796 22-09-2016 13:06

Re: Registration 2017
 
Well I can't say I'm actually surprised. I was actually kind of expecting it.
It was disappointing because after all the years of dealing with the madness of crashing webpages, the past 2 years we finally had seamless registration with a perfectly functioning TIMS but then the new site came and I knew we were in for an adventure.

A community stress test on a new site or software has been successfully run by much smaller communities than FIRST. They could easily run a mock opening with plenty willing to offer their help in logging in for a few minutes a day or two before the real show. Maybe something to consider in the coming week.

Good to hear they finally called it off and called a mulligan.

Welp, guess we will be reconvening next week!

nixiebunny 22-09-2016 13:08

Re: Registration 2017
 
This is why I have a cushy part time job... to be able to waste an hour griping about a failed registration system on social media.

But seriously, I assume you can pay a testing company to slam your site with 5000 pretend registration attempts in two seconds. If I ran a website like this, that's the first thing I'd arrange for.

SGK 22-09-2016 13:09

Re: Registration 2017
 
Their new server consists of all the returned Samsung Galaxy Note 7's!! --- Just Kidding!!!

Andrew Schreiber 22-09-2016 13:09

Re: Registration 2017
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nixiebunny (Post 1608441)
This is why I have a cushy part time job... to be able to waste an hour griping about a failed registration system on social media.

But seriously, I assume you can pay a testing company to slam your site with 5000 pretend registration attempts in two seconds. If I ran a website like this, that's the first thing I'd arrange for.

You can do it yourself with a bit of work. There's a handful of tools out there for it. Tsung is the one I've seen folks use in the past, but I've never had much of a need for it myself.

marshall 22-09-2016 13:10

Re: Registration 2017
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nixiebunny (Post 1608441)
This is why I have a cushy part time job... to be able to waste an hour griping about a failed registration system on social media.

But seriously, I assume you can pay a testing company to slam your site with 5000 pretend registration attempts in two seconds. If I ran a website like this, that's the first thing I'd arrange for.

Pay someone for it? That's what testing suites and tools are for. Simulating load these days isn't difficult.

Lil' Lavery 22-09-2016 13:12

Re: Registration 2017
 
Not sure what all these "shoulda, coulda, woulda" posts are really accomplishing.

ScoutMom700 22-09-2016 13:12

Re: Registration 2017
 
FIRST Facebook page reporting registration is postponed to next week.

synth3tk 22-09-2016 13:13

Re: Registration 2017
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by AllenGregoryIV (Post 1608435)
we aren't expecting them to be perfect but they could also provide far better service to their customers and not wait 45 mins before making any public update.

👀

This.

marshall 22-09-2016 13:15

Re: Registration 2017
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Lil' Lavery (Post 1608445)
Not sure what all these "shoulda, coulda, woulda" posts are really accomplishing.

They are users being frustrated. It's what people do when things don't work out the way they expect. It's ok and it's a good thing. If someone hits on an idea that helps make it better in the future then it is worth it. The important thing is that everyone have some empathy with the IT gals and guys working this problem at FIRST HQ. Sometimes things break and we need to be patient and understanding about it... that doesn't mean we can't lament/complain/grieve/hypothesize publicly.

notmattlythgoe 22-09-2016 13:15

Re: Registration 2017
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Lil' Lavery (Post 1608445)
Not sure what all these "shoulda, coulda, woulda" posts are really accomplishing.

Not sure what all these "Not sure what all these shoulda, coulda, woulda posts are really accomplishing" post are really accomplishing.

nixiebunny 22-09-2016 13:16

Re: Registration 2017
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Lil' Lavery (Post 1608445)
Not sure what all these "shoulda, coulda, woulda" posts are really accomplishing.

They accomplish the venting of STEAM.

FrankJ 22-09-2016 13:16

Re: Registration 2017
 
Site seems to work now.

(No, registration is not open) :]

marshall 22-09-2016 13:17

Re: Registration 2017
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by FrankJ (Post 1608451)
Site seems to work now.

(No, registration is not open) :]

Nice editing... smooth. ;)

David Brinza 22-09-2016 13:17

Re: Registration 2017
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Lil' Lavery (Post 1608445)
Not sure what all these "shoulda, coulda, woulda" posts are really accomplishing.

Agreed, but FIRST not anticipating this possibility (given prior history AND the new website) by having "Plan-B" ready to go isn't acceptable.
The email blast announcing a postponement should have been sent an hour earlier. I'm pretty sure the writing was on the wall 10 minutes after opening.

Lil' Lavery 22-09-2016 13:18

Re: Registration 2017
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by notmattlythgoe (Post 1608449)
Not sure what all these "Not sure what all these shoulda, coulda, woulda posts are really accomplishing" post are really accomplishing.

My hope was to transition the thread towards a more positive tone (and as Marshall said, more empathy towards the IT folks who are surely very stressed at the moment). I see now that my attempt was only mildly successful, at best.

Trying to Help 22-09-2016 13:18

Re: Registration 2017
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by iyportne (Post 1608425)
I know this is unfortunate, but as a continuous improvement professional I know none of us have gotten to where we are without backward steps, and I trust FIRST will fix and make good on this process as well.

My bigger concern now is tempering the attitude of my students who may be reading this thread. Some may come away with the idea we should never try new things and take risks to move forward and just keep doing what we are to avoid ridicule should things go wrong.

Remember, everyone can predict something that just happened, and everyone can solve an isolated issue without the entire context.

Perhaps we can use this thread as a case study for Gracious Professionalism vs. Ungracious Pro-victimism...heaven known we have the evening news for the latter.


I am not ridiculing FIRST. And I know that we all make mistakes. Sometimes those mistakes have lasting, serious consequences. This is thankfully not one of those instances.

This is a professionally created tool that is an essential part of the FRC process. As such, the robotics community has reasonable expectations that FIRST upholds their portion of the implicit agreement. We postpone work, schedule lunch early, have someone cover for us, etc. We will now have to do it again for next week. And for those of us in district competitions, not too long again after that.

It's reasonable that if you try something and fail, people call you on it. I did say that there are plenty of resources out there to help troubleshoot and remediate the problem.

SparkyMark 22-09-2016 13:27

Re: Registration 2017
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nixiebunny (Post 1608450)
They accomplish the venting of STEAM.

Steam venting... lol. Water games confirmed, eh?? Has anybody else checked out the event site(s) specifically? Apparently all events this year take place in the middle of the week. All those I looked at begin on Tuesday and end on Friday.

My boss isn't gonna like this :eek:

Aren Siekmeier 22-09-2016 13:42

Re: Registration 2017
 
Everything looks to be back up. No teams registered. Still waiting on the date and time for next week to be announced (I'd assume 9/29 at noon EDT).

iyportne 22-09-2016 14:12

Re: Registration 2017
 
...case study continued....

Here's an interesting observation. Nearly everybody here was undoubtedly logged in and looking at your dashboard at T - 500ms. From the conversation here, we also all figured we would have our registration choice clicked and secured at T + 10,000 ms. Generously allowing for those with slow reflexes and internet speeds below 1 Mbps, let's say that the expected lifecycle of the registration product to be...Oh let's say 60,000 ms. We know it and FIRST knows it.

IT FAILED...AND we all knew that at T+ 0ms as did FIRST

Given the life cycle and failure mode which is :confused: somehow well researched, documented and proven on this thread :confused: within 5 product life cycles, one could conclude that waiting more than 10 life cycles (that would be 10 minute for anyone lost in the math) for the product to suddenly start working again, or needing FIRST to state the already obvious is, well, curious.

Conor Ryan 22-09-2016 14:20

Re: Registration 2017
 
Too bad we can't give green dots to the IT team.

Anybody have ideas for a crowdsourced solution? I'm sure districts will want to move their own process in the future.

TJP123 22-09-2016 14:23

Re: Registration 2017
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tim Sharp (Post 1608322)
I'm getting a 503 error

You'll have to be more specific. I can recall many, many 503 errors.

guniv 22-09-2016 14:30

Re: Registration 2017
 
I had to get somewhere earlier when this whole debacle was happening, so I watched as long as I could. Then I got to my car, put my laptop in the passenger seat, turned on my mobile hotspot, and f5'd the page nearly the whole commute.

Anyways, a shame it's postponed for a week. I hope it's early next week. Our team has enough going on.

AllenGregoryIV 22-09-2016 14:31

Re: Registration 2017
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by iyportne (Post 1608474)

Given the life cycle and failure mode which is :confused: somehow well researched, documented and proven on this thread :confused: within 5 product life cycles, one could conclude that waiting more than 10 life cycles (that would be 10 minute for anyone lost in the math) for the product to suddenly start working again, or needing FIRST to state the already obvious is, well, curious.

The problem is this isn't unheard of FIRST. It's often been a problem with demand and the system has come back up at some unannounced later time during the day. Without official announcement of a postponement there is no way to know if we should continue with our lives or stay glued to the screen waiting for something to change. Assuming the former for some teams means losing out on their preferred event or more money spent on travel or not being able to do two+ events at all.

EmileH 22-09-2016 14:37

Re: Registration 2017
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Conor Ryan (Post 1608476)
Too bad we can't give green dots to the IT team.

Anybody have ideas for a crowdsourced solution? I'm sure districts will want to move their own process in the future.

Let districts host their own registration system(s) and manage the required IT? Like events?

Koko Ed 22-09-2016 14:44

Re: Registration 2017
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Lil' Lavery (Post 1608454)
My hope was to transition the thread towards a more positive tone (and as Marshall said, more empathy towards the IT folks who are surely very stressed at the moment). I see now that my attempt was only mildly successful, at best.

CD being CD.

David Brinza 22-09-2016 14:48

Re: Registration 2017
 
I don't want to take shots at the IT team at FIRST, I'm sure they work hard and are understaffed for the job at hand.

The IT team's consistent struggle with rolling out website upgrades, server capacity, etc. is a byproduct of the way FIRST is operated. I've seen these struggles many times in the 14 years I've been in FIRST. The decision to not invest in the kind of workforce needed to develop and adequately test their IT environment before rolling it out comes from the very top of the organization.

Unfortunately, we teams (i.e. their customers) pay the price of wasting valuable time and having unnecessary stress injected into what should be a relatively straight-forward process.

I hope Frank and Don recognize the importance of having a reliable IT interface between teams and the program. I hope they are able to convince the top guy to make the decision to fix this problem permanently. I'm just hoping things do change...soon.

Jardanium 22-09-2016 14:49

Re: Registration 2017
 
I was wondering why my phone blew up with notifications about a half-hour after registration opened. Oh well, here's to hoping that next week goes a lot smoother!

Banderoonies 22-09-2016 14:50

Re: Registration 2017
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Trying to Help (Post 1608455)

We postpone work, schedule lunch early, have someone cover for us, etc. We will now have to do it again for next week. And for those of us in district competitions, not too long again after that.

.

Took the words out of my mouth. Now i have to get coverage and reschedule work around this again.

nuclearnerd 22-09-2016 14:55

Re: Registration 2017
 
Has this been suggested already?

Why the heck can't we submit a ranked list, and have the machine choose who gets where based on their chosen priority and a random draw? You could even do it in multiple draws if you want to give teams the chance to adjust their second decision based on the results of their first result. We already do this for FIRST choice, and it works perfectly well.

What use is forcing people to all click refresh at the same time when we already have an alternative system that is easier on mentors' time and server load?

ScoutMom700 22-09-2016 14:56

Re: Registration 2017
 
Did anyone see that regionals are listed as Tuesday through Friday instead of Wednesday through Saturday in tims? Part of the glitch?

Edit - I just looked at the calendar and the Tuesday - Friday dates are for the 2016 calendar, some one didn't put in the 2017 dates for regionals.

Jimmy Nichols 22-09-2016 15:01

Re: Registration 2017
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nuclearnerd (Post 1608487)
Has this been suggested already?

Why the heck can't we submit a ranked list, and have the machine choose who gets where based on their chosen priority and a random draw? You could even do it in multiple draws if you want to give teams the chance to adjust their second decision based on the results of their first result. We already do this for FIRST choice, and it works perfectly well.

What use is forcing people to all click refresh at the same time when we already have an alternative system that is easier on mentors' time and server load?

This would alienate a lot of teams that only attend 1 event and its the closest/least expensive/local event. I know several teams that a system like this would effect.

AllenGregoryIV 22-09-2016 15:07

Re: Registration 2017
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ScoutMom700 (Post 1608488)
Did anyone see that regionals are listed as Tuesday through Friday instead of Wednesday through Saturday in tims? Part of the glitch?

Edit - I just looked at the calendar and the Tuesday - Friday dates are for the 2016 calendar, some one didn't put in the 2017 dates for regionals.

I don't think it's a 2016 to 2017 problem. My hypothesis is it's a time issue. Namely they only put in dates and didn't put in a time. The system probably defaulted to 12AM Eastern Time, so it shows up as 11PM Tue-Fri for me since I'm in Central Time instead of 12AM Wed-Sat. Someone in another timezone want to confirm that the times aren't set to 11PM?

cpapplefamily 22-09-2016 15:08

Re: Registration 2017
 
fixed 1 event teams get first choice.

nuclearnerd 22-09-2016 15:10

Re: Registration 2017
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jimmy Nichols (Post 1608490)
This would alienate a lot of teams that only attend 1 event and its the closest/least expensive/local event. I know several teams that a system like this would effect.

Why? How is it more fair to give an event to teams that click on it quickest instead of randomly splitting the spots amongst the teams that prioritize it most?

waialua359 22-09-2016 15:19

Re: Registration 2017
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nuclearnerd (Post 1608487)
Has this been suggested already?

Why the heck can't we submit a ranked list, and have the machine choose who gets where based on their chosen priority and a random draw? You could even do it in multiple draws if you want to give teams the chance to adjust their second decision based on the results of their first result. We already do this for FIRST choice, and it works perfectly well.

What use is forcing people to all click refresh at the same time when we already have an alternative system that is easier on mentors' time and server load?

I have been vocal in the past about not having to click the fastest to get the event we want.
However, I am not sure submitting a ranked list is what I would want either.
Getting an event you want involves so much preparation and planning weeks in advance and afterwards. It can also be quite costly not getting the event you want, especially for a team like us having to fly to events. If we sign up for an East Coast event Week 1, our next event choice priority would be to find something else as close as possible.
Someone from our team asked why not do San Francisco Week 3 next? Biggest hurdle is an extra 3-4k shipping cost to get it there.
FIRST donates 2 airbills per year to us. We use it to get our robot to the US mainland, and then back to Hawaii for our event later during competition season.

Hallry 22-09-2016 15:23

Re: Registration 2017
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Conor Ryan (Post 1608476)
Anybody have ideas for a crowdsourced solution?

Yes, the Payne Protocol:

Quote:

Originally Posted by PayneTrain (Post 1608360)
If a reliable scaling solution is too infeasible, perhaps you register 2-3 district systems per day, then open up regionals?

Let District systems A, B, and C register on Monday Districts systems D, E, and F register on Tuesday. Districts systems G, H, and I register on Wednesday. Let all regional teams register on Thursday. There's no reason district and regional teams need to sign up for their initial events on the same days.

After initial registration, the next registration opening (October 6th) is just for 2nd In-District Events and Championship for Pre-Qualified Teams. The servers should be able to handle that. I would split up the following registration opening (October 20th) into two dates, one for 2nd Regional events and another for the Championship Waitlist. The November 3rd registration is for Unrestricted Regional events and 3rd In-District events, and November 10th is for Inter-District events, both of which the server should again be able to take care of.

MeGuttieri 22-09-2016 15:23

Re: Registration 2017
 
Faith in FIRST restored (not)

nuclearnerd 22-09-2016 15:58

Re: Registration 2017
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by waialua359 (Post 1608497)
I am not sure submitting a ranked list is what I would want either.... If we sign up for an East Coast event Week 1, our next event choice priority would be to find something else as close as possible.

Forgive me, but I don't understand the objection. Wouldn't ranking "East Coast Event" first, "close events" second through whatever capture your intent? You could adjust your priority list for the second draw after learning the results of the first.

Lil' Lavery 22-09-2016 16:00

Re: Registration 2017
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jimmy Nichols (Post 1608490)
This would alienate a lot of teams that only attend 1 event and its the closest/least expensive/local event. I know several teams that a system like this would effect.

Perhaps a "silent auction" type of system. Each team is given a budget of X points to allocate among events they want to attend. Single event teams can dump all of their points into their local event that way.


Granted, any system is still going to need some leeway for the regional directors and reserve capacity slots. Hopefully reserve slots accommodate those single event teams, regardless of what system is used for registration.

waialua359 22-09-2016 16:22

Re: Registration 2017
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nuclearnerd (Post 1608507)
Forgive me, but I don't understand the objection. Wouldn't ranking "East Coast Event" first, "close events" second through whatever capture your intent? You could adjust your priority list for the second draw after learning the results of the first.

It would work, if you didnt factor in not wanting the 1st event anymore because you couldnt get your 1st choice.
Based on the current system in the past, it has allowed me to pick and choose what I want, cancel when I want, and then repick somewhere else. The suggested system puts everyone on the same time block for preferences vs. on the fly in trying to secure a spot at an event.
Having the ability to choose, based on the number of remaining slots available is a strategy to try and ensure you get all of the package of events you want to participate in.

mathking 23-09-2016 08:37

Re: Registration 2017
 
I would like to see a system where each team submitted a first and a second choice or just a first choice. Try to give as many teams as possible their first choices, using a lottery or auction model, whatever seems appropriate. This would allow regional directors to use some of the slots that are held back to place teams earlier. (Ex: If there are 10 slots held for late registering rookies and nearby teams, and four nearby teams were unlucky and didn't get one of the open slots, they could get one of the reserved slots.) Give teams their second choice if possible and they selected a second choice. This would allow teams to submit a ballot by the given date, and the system could spit out the results. A little work by the people at HQ and the regional directors and they publish a list of who got their slots where.

Then a few days later let all of the teams that have not yet registered for a competition resubmit a request for one of the still available slots.

Lil' Lavery 05-10-2016 12:00

Re: FIRST Server Issues
 
And 1712 is registered for the Seneca event. Quick and painless.

MrForbes 05-10-2016 12:25

Re: FIRST Server Issues
 
yay! it works

MooreteP 05-10-2016 12:30

Re: FIRST Server Issues
 
Like butter.

sanddrag 06-10-2016 11:57

Re: Registration 2017
 
Completed registration for Los Angeles by 9:00:11 PDT. By 9:00:23, 15 teams were registered. By 9:01:00, the site is non-responsive. Now showing server runtime error at 9:02:25.

guniv 06-10-2016 11:57

Re: Registration 2017
 
We just got our registration in, confirmation page, refreshed to see what other teams had signed up and it's down again.

Tyler Olds 06-10-2016 11:58

Re: Registration 2017
 
Wave got in immediately. Showing 25 slots left for Central Illinois.

Chief Hedgehog 06-10-2016 11:58

Re: Registration 2017
 
And it's down...

Arefin Bari 06-10-2016 11:58

Re: Registration 2017
 
Crashed!

Ryan Dognaux 06-10-2016 11:58

Re: Registration 2017
 
Getting runtime errors :(

Doug G 06-10-2016 11:59

Re: Registration 2017
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sanddrag (Post 1610499)
Registered for Los Angeles by 9:00:11 PDT. By 9:00:23, 15 teams were registered. By 9:01:00, the site is non-responsive. Now showing server runtime error at 9:02:25.

Nicely done sir... same runtime error... "just keep swimming..."

MrForbes 06-10-2016 11:59

Re: Registration 2017
 
I clicked the button, and nothing happened...then I could not connect doing a search...then I got a runtime error page...then I got an email saying we're registered.

Interesting.

pmcoburn 06-10-2016 12:00

Re: Registration 2017
 
<runtime errors> Me too...

Jimmy Nichols 06-10-2016 12:00

Re: Registration 2017
 
I got into Miami Valley (MVR) and when checking capacity it crashed.

David Guzman 06-10-2016 12:00

Re: Registration 2017
 
I was able to get a page confirming we are registered. But as soon as I tried to go back to the dashboard crashed.

RoboTigers1796 06-10-2016 12:01

Re: Registration 2017
 
I was able to register in the first 30 seconds... got an email confirmation. Went back to take a look at how many spots were left and the site died. Anyone else able tor register?

bhsrobotics1671 06-10-2016 12:01

Re: Registration 2017
 
I was able to register for our initial regional event as well just before the crash

waialua359 06-10-2016 12:02

Re: Registration 2017
 
We got our event, then system went down also as I tried to check. I noticed 5 other teams had got in also for Pittsburgh.

mathking 06-10-2016 12:03

Re: Registration 2017
 
I was frozen out before it said that I had registered. I will be so infuriated if this keeps up for another hour. And if we don't get our first choice, which was open and we should have gotten, it will cost us a couple thousand extra dollars.

billbo911 06-10-2016 12:03

Re: Registration 2017
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RoboTigers1796 (Post 1610515)
I was able to register in the first 30 seconds... got an email confirmation. Went back to take a look at how many spots were left and the site died. Anyone else able tor register?

Exact same thing happened with me.
I was worried when the page would not update once I clicked "Register", but after 30 sec or so, I got an email confirmation we were registered for SAC.

Crash time, again!

M. Mellott 06-10-2016 12:04

Re: Registration 2017
 
Error after I hit the 'Register' button...did this twice with the same error, but now all I get are runtime errors.

No email confirmation...BOOOOOO!!!

ngreen 06-10-2016 12:04

Re: Registration 2017
 
Registered 1108 for GKC regional and took a photo for confirmation, but dashboard was down when I tried to go back. It showed 7 teams registered (43 remaining) for the regional.

Bruceb 06-10-2016 12:04

Re: Registration 2017
 
I keep getting a runtime error just trying to get to my dashboard.
Is that where everybody else is getting the error? Those that have been successful, how did you get past the error?

Doug G 06-10-2016 12:04

Re: Registration 2017
 
Oooh... a new error... 502 Proxy Error. To be a fly on the wall at FIRST HQ!

cpapplefamily 06-10-2016 12:04

Re: Registration 2017
 
No go here. Well looks like we will have to reset so everyone has the same fair chance to register.

topgun 06-10-2016 12:05

Re: Registration 2017
 
Just got a 503 error. Couldn't even get registered.

ghesla 06-10-2016 12:05

Re: Registration 2017
 
We got the registration email, so we are all set, right? Can I go to lunch? :p


Quote:

Hello Team 1156,

Congratulations on completing the FIRST Robotics Competition (FRC) Event Registration process!
Your team is registered to attend the SBPLI Long Island Regional.

David Brinza 06-10-2016 12:05

Re: Registration 2017
 
Logged in at 9:00:30 and got as far as clicking on Event Registration when a "Something went wrong!" message appeared.

Unable to login since..."There was an unexpected error."

Primal scream therapy not helping.

tjwolter 06-10-2016 12:05

Re: FIRST Server Issues
 
No Go. How's everyone else faring?

fargus111111111 06-10-2016 12:05

Re: Registration 2017
 
Nothing but runtime errors.

hionwind 06-10-2016 12:06

Re: Registration 2017
 
I was not able to register for SAC. Got a "runtime" error. Now I can't even log in to the FIRST website.

This is really frustrating.

Breakaway3937 06-10-2016 12:06

Re: Registration 2017
 
Anyone else getting the a white screen that says...

"This is a custom view"

??????

nixiebunny 06-10-2016 12:06

Re: Registration 2017
 
I see either "This is a custom view" or "This is a custom view" followed by "Error" when logging in.

I think they need to learn how to do load testing.

Mr.Frishman 06-10-2016 12:06

Re: Registration 2017
 
We got registered for Brazos Valley. I got the email saying we are registered. Went back to check capacity of the event and the site has crashed.

bigbeezy 06-10-2016 12:07

Re: Registration 2017
 
Wasn't able to get in before the crash...Was very slow loading. Clicked Midwest and nothing.

bcampbell 06-10-2016 12:07

Re: Registration 2017
 
I was able to register for our first event and then when i tried to click on the dashboard to confirm it had crashed by then.... I did get a confirmation email that we are registered for the event. Good luck for those who are still trying, I hope it comes back up and you can get into your event.

dwodrich 06-10-2016 12:07

Re: Registration 2017
 
runtime errors for me as well

snoman 06-10-2016 12:08

Re: Registration 2017
 
i got one of our teams registered but we have 2 teams that need to be in the same event!!!:confused:

bdaroz 06-10-2016 12:08

Re: Registration 2017
 
Our lead mentors weren't able to even attempt to register before the feces hit the ventilation.

notmattlythgoe 06-10-2016 12:08

Re: Registration 2017
 
Anyone else find it fishy that right when registration crashes CD also becomes flaky? With the district teams registered there shouldn't be nearly as much of a rush to CD when the regional registration crashes.

Bruceb 06-10-2016 12:10

Re: Registration 2017
 
ohhh now getting page not found when going to dashboard


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 15:31.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi