![]() |
Motorizied flow control
Hello
I came up with an idea to control the speed of a piston and use it with precision and i wanted to make sure its legal. we bought 5 ports - 3 position valves so we could stop the piston at any position we want, but we had a problem, the piston is moving too fast for the drivers to control it well. so i attached flow control tubes to the relief ports in the valve http://www.andymark.com/product-p/am-2690.htm its worked well but if we wanted to open the pistons fast we couldn't do so. so i connected a hobby servo with a gear ratio to the screw on the flow control tubes so i can control the speed of piston with driving. is this legal? tnx in advance :D |
Re: Motorizied flow control
To be honest, while I cannot recall a rule against doing so, a setup like that would have me asking the LRI for advice.
If you have a reason to use such a setup in the regular season, please ask the official Q&A as early as possible--and then bring the answer to your events, just in case your LRI hasn't read that particular Q&A. |
Re: Motorizied flow control
Quote:
|
Re: Motorizied flow control
as written in rule R77-F in this year's game:
"F. Pressure transducers, pressure gauges, passive flow control valves (specifically “needle valve”), manifolds, and connecting fittings" as u see its written passive flow control valves, so i dont know if it counts as an active or passive one. |
Re: Motorizied flow control
We had a team pass with something similar at Waterloo, the LRI and I couldn't find anything illegal about it. As long as the pneumatic fitting remain unmodified It should be fine. I would still consult the Q&A as the ruling of inspectors could vary and It could potentially save some time during inspection.
|
Re: Motorizied flow control
Quote:
|
Re: Motorizied flow control
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Motorizied flow control
The rules problem isn't with the throttle valve, it's with the 3 position solenoid valve. AFAIK, the pneumatic system is supposed to completely depressurize when you open the vent valve. A 3 position valve in the "locked" position would prevent that.
Edit: or what Joe said |
Re: Motorizied flow control
Quote:
|
Re: Motorizied flow control
Quote:
|
Re: Motorizied flow control
As already mentioned the problem with your system is not the flow controls, but the 3-position valve.The question of using a 3-position valve to achieve intermediate cylinder positions has come up many times. If the center valve position is both-ports-closed, this technique is illegal because it creates closed, pressurized lines that are not vented when the system is vented. If the center valve position is both-ports-exhausted, this should be legal, but would have no ability to hold its position on its own.
|
Re: Motorizied flow control
It is a little Rube Golbergish, but there is a way to make a closed center 3 position valve legal under 2016 rules. You use check valves to allow both sides of the cylinder to flow back the working pressure side of the system. They won't do anything when the system is pressurized, but they will vent the cylinder when the system is depressurized.
|
Re: Motorizied flow control
1 Attachment(s)
Attached is a sketch on how to use check valves to make using a closed center 3 position valve legal under FRC rules (at least for 2016) :]
|
Re: Motorizied flow control
Quote:
|
Re: Motorizied flow control
Quote:
The downside is the limited compressor size means you wouldn't be able to move a cylinder bigger than ~1" more than a few cycles a match. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:26. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi