![]() |
Re: [FRC Blog] Control System Update
Quote:
It seems like such a requirement wouldn't be necessary -- there are a significant portion of teams using each language, so not supporting one of them would be leaving money on the table. |
Re: [FRC Blog] Control System Update
I think it depends on the component. It's not be a big deal for sensors. But for anything FIRST limits such as motor controllers...well, if CTRE didn't support one language for their Talons SRX, any team that typically uses it would be at a distinct disadvantage.
|
Re: [FRC Blog] Control System Update
Quote:
We program in Java, if I see a cool sensor out there that is only supported by Python, my first thought should either be: Is it worth it to switch our programming language to Python in order to use this sensor? Or Can we somehow get this sensor to work with our existing programming language? Not Can we somehow ban this sensor so that no other team can use it? |
Re: [FRC Blog] Control System Update
Just a thought, but we have a Linux OS on the roboRIO which we have root access to. We can use this to our mutual advantage. POSIX interprocess communication from a sensor plug-in to C++/Java/LabView?
|
Re: [FRC Blog] Control System Update
Quote:
|
Re: [FRC Blog] Control System Update
Ok ok, FTA is standing, kneeling, and troubleshooting the FMS, bending over it with the precision adjustment tool trying to get it working again. Although I have seen FTAs sitting for long periods of time. Typically when in discussion with HQ about why the #$^@#($ field is acting up again.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:12. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi