![]() |
2015 Events By 2014 Rankings
I made a small note a while ago on that 2014 vs. 2015 vs. 2016 Rankings thread that I was going to see what events would have looked like in 2015 if Recycle Rush had used a win-loss-tie system. I am now happy to say that I have completed the first part of it, and I'm ready to share it with you all!
This isn't complete, and I'll keep updating it as time goes on. For now, you can what each of the eight championship divisions would have looked like at this link: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets...t#gid=43299538 Some interesting insights from my findings are as follows: Archimedes:
Carson:
Carver:
Curie:
Galileo:
Hopper:
Newton:
Tesla:
To you, what is the most interesting insight of this thought experiment? What is the most surprising finding of yours? Once again, I'll update this list with more events as time goes on. |
Re: 2015 Events By 2014 Rankings
Quote:
|
Re: 2015 Events By 2014 Rankings
What did you use as the tiebreaker to rank teams that had the same win-loss records?
|
Re: 2015 Events By 2014 Rankings
Quote:
|
Re: 2015 Events By 2014 Rankings
Quote:
|
Re: 2015 Events By 2014 Rankings
Would you be able to create a similar report for 2016 divisions? I apologize if those exist within your sheets, I am not data savvy.
|
Re: 2015 Events By 2014 Rankings
Quote:
|
Re: 2015 Events By 2014 Rankings
Looks interesting! How would the "Avg. Qualification" affect the rankings if used as a tiebreaker?
|
Re: 2015 Events By 2014 Rankings
1058 would've jumped up from 48th to 16th, probably would've made that trip a little more enjoyable.
|
Re: 2015 Events By 2014 Rankings
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 18:13. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi