![]() |
Most Competitive Events 2017
After 2 rounds of registration, which events seem to be the most stacked for 2017?
My picks are Waterford (27, 33, 67, 217), Las Vegas(118, 148, 842, 1538) and Midwest (16, 111, 1986, 2451) |
Re: Most Competitive Events 2017
Quote:
Edit: In all seriousness though, the actual Waterloo event has 1114, 2056, 3683, 4039, and probably some others I'm missing, so it's likely to be an extremely good event. |
Re: Most Competitive Events 2017
Quote:
|
Re: Most Competitive Events 2017
Quote:
|
Re: Most Competitive Events 2017
Hub City is looking pretty decent, (at least compared to what I remember of it from previous years). (118, 624, 1477, 2481)
One thing I have learned about FRC is that there is no such thing as an "easy" event. And when you think you have found one, there is always 2 or more teams that will surprise you, and POOF, there goes the hope for an "easy" event! |
Re: Most Competitive Events 2017
Quote:
|
Re: Most Competitive Events 2017
Quote:
|
Re: Most Competitive Events 2017
Here are some estimates I did using historical OPR data:
Code:
Rank All Teams Top 24 Top 8
One thing that should be kept in mind is that many events have still yet to let in teams from the waitlist. Tech Valley, one of last year's more competitive regionals, is full at 21 teams with a capacity of 36 last year and is ranked 118, 121, and 119 by these metrics. In addition, top teams registering for third plays could shake things up, especially the Top 8 rankings. OPR is by no means a perfect number, but I believe this lends some insight to this (purely for fun) discussion. For calculations, I used a weighted average of max-OPR z scores from the past three years, with more recent OPRs weighted more heavily. |
Re: Most Competitive Events 2017
Quote:
|
Re: Most Competitive Events 2017
Quote:
Midwest is also only at 44 teams right now, and usually has well over 50 teams every year so there could be even more highly competitive teams to register. |
Re: Most Competitive Events 2017
Quote:
I'm really looking forward to both IL regionals this year. Tons of talented teams at both events! Midwest has lots of high level visitors this year (1511, 1592, 1986, 2848). 16 returning too! |
Re: Most Competitive Events 2017
No doubt i'm going to watch 'ONT District - Ryerson University Event 2017'
with: 188, 610, 1114, 1241, 1310, 1325. With 610, 1241 and 3560 u have the winning alliance of Waterloo 2016. And what do i have to say about the other teams? :yikes: |
Re: Most Competitive Events 2017
For New England, both Connecticut events look strong (Waterbury and Hartford) with 177, 195, 230 and 558 attending each event.
|
Re: Most Competitive Events 2017
2 Attachment(s)
Quote:
In Michigan there are still 33% of the district spots to fill, so this is preliminary data, and numbers will move around as waitlist spots are cleared. But as currently registered, Waterford is the number 1 competitive district, with and average PR=1.862, followed by St. Joseph PR=1.854 Top Michigan teams that are not currently registered for two events, that can significantly impact this distribution are: 107 (1), 68 (2), 4362(1), 2054(1), 3602(1), 3620(1) This PR calculation with only looking a 3 years, negatively impacts some historically great teams in Michigan, 469 (which finished 1st in 2012 and 2013), 51, 245, 217, 314, 910 which all are impacted by single poor competition year result. Last year the PR of Waterford (last years most competitive district) was on par with MSC, it doesn't look as competitive this year, but that could change when all the numbers shake out, but it does not seem to be moving in that direction. Typically disclaimers, I think the data presented is accurate, but I am always making excel errors, YMMV. :) |
Re: Most Competitive Events 2017
Has anyone else noticed that some of the most competitive district events have the word "Water" in the event name? FIM Waterford, Ontario Waterloo, NE Waterbury. I think we all know what this means...
|
Re: Most Competitive Events 2017
Quote:
|
Re: Most Competitive Events 2017
Utah looks stronger than usual this year. (987, 2122, 1619, 3230, 4334, etc.)
|
Re: Most Competitive Events 2017
Also, since almost all teams have registered by now, has anyone figured out if that one team from Alaska that said they were sponsored by a lard company actually exists?
|
Re: Most Competitive Events 2017
Quote:
Here's hoping these really top-heavy events don't crush the middle tier teams out of a chance at States. I'm sure it'll be fine, but it's certainly intimidating. |
Re: Most Competitive Events 2017
Quote:
How else can I get my polar bear sized tub of Lard? |
Re: Most Competitive Events 2017
Quote:
|
Re: Most Competitive Events 2017
I wonder if 118's streak could be in jeopardy this year, especially if 987 joins the party at Las Vegas.
|
Re: Most Competitive Events 2017
Quote:
|
Re: Most Competitive Events 2017
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Most Competitive Events 2017
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Most Competitive Events 2017
Quote:
In all reality, I'm very excited to play at Waterbury and Hartford. Sounds like a super competitive bunch and it's always fun to learn from them and play with them. |
Re: Most Competitive Events 2017
Am I the only one who judges the "difficulty" of an event by how many teams from IRI are playing there? I realize that not every high caliber team competes at IRI but isn't it a fairly good measurement?
|
Re: Most Competitive Events 2017
Quote:
Other events like that include Las Vegas (148, 842, and 1538 didn't go to IRI) and even Silicon Valley (254, 971, 2468 all didn't go to IRI). Sometimes it works as an indicator and sometimes it doesn't. |
Re: Most Competitive Events 2017
Quote:
That being said, competitiveness doesn't necessarily mean "hardest" or "easiest" depending on who you are asking. If I am part of a team that generally performs really well, a high number of teams on the "watch out" list means a very tough event. Now, if I was part of a newer team that maybe isn't the top scorer but is fairly consistent, I would say an event with a lot of top tier teams is easier than others. Why? Well if an event only has one or two really top tier teams, odds are if my average team is not going to win the event unless we get to be the 24th pick and be with the top teams. In an event where multiple alliances have a solid shot at winning, the odds for an average team to win go up since your fate is less likely to be sealed in alliance selection. |
Re: Most Competitive Events 2017
I think the FIM Southfield event will defiantly have team 33,67,548 as alliance partners.
|
Re: Most Competitive Events 2017
Quote:
In fact, 33 has won their week 1 on the #1 alliance 6 years in a row now if I'm not mistaken. |
Re: Most Competitive Events 2017
I find the most competitive events aren't ones with the top tier of FRC in attendance.
For me you take a few perennial solid teams, mix in some teams playing to their strengths, and add in some final day breakouts and the eliminations are up for grabs by any alliance. That's why I'd say opening events are the most competitive when the powerhouses aren't around. You aren't entirely sure how the game will be played out on the field come Saturday or Sunday so the options for a winning strategy aren't as defined seeing as you are playing the game first. Everyone is still working out some early season bugs so there are some hit or miss matches. It creates this suspense of who will hit their marks or who can try to remain consistent to keep their scores up? Watching some of the Granite State District elimination matches over the years have been exciting for me. Its a taste to see how the game will play out and the crowd does get excited over the first big scores of the year even if it is just a simple Capture, tall capped stack, or three assist cycle. When you look back it seems "weak" but in the moment it is extremely exciting and many alliances have pulled of a few upsets in the bracket. |
Re: Most Competitive Events 2017
I would say most competitive would have to be the most fairly balanced regional. I've attended many different regionals where there's a couple good robots that can dominate. Last year NYC regional for example had a fair number of teams competing for their first time who weren't confident in their bots, don't have huge test facilities and those things.
There were a few teams who clearly at the event it's scary if they got together, that's one reason we tried to build our alliance where one of the few scary alliances we might face could be shut down. I think the finger lakes regional is a very competitive one. The last two years I went to it, it's never given who might win. 5254 had an amazing bot both years, and went to the finals but got upset. When we were choosing an alliance in 2015 it was hard to figure who is the best choice for us, because they're were many great choices. Everyone their picked first round or second is a great partner if you needed their skills. Finger lakes is so competitive because the qualifies always has great match ups where any match can go either way, and it's always so close. So in terms of most competitive regional I might lean towards it because everyone is so balanced in the sense of how good their robots can be. |
Re: Most Competitive Events 2017
Quote:
It's no fun to watch an event get dominated by a couple teams (unless you're on them). I would much rather pay attention to one with a deep field of solid teams. But hey, personal preference. |
Re: Most Competitive Events 2017
So I personally can't say I know which will events will be especially competitive, but I can say that GKC will not be, If I had to put money on it , Titanium (1986) would have a 75-95% chance of winning with Driven (1730) or Broncobots (1987)(45% Driven, 40% BroncoBots, 15% other) being in the alliance OR getting second place alliance captain. Not sure if I really added anything to the conversation, but I thought I'd throw my two cents in on the regional I know the best.
Also the team I'm on (1764) will get somewhere between 16th and 30th seed if I had to guess. |
Re: Most Competitive Events 2017
Quote:
|
Re: Most Competitive Events 2017
Quote:
|
Re: Most Competitive Events 2017
Quote:
My former team, 3481, and 2468 shared a trailer at IRI. --Michael Blake |
Re: Most Competitive Events 2017
Both Events in Minneapolis this year certainly have decent potential, at least based on MN potential, North Star has 1806, 2175, 2169, and 3130 to name a few. While 10K lakes has 5172, 2052, 2502 and others. While they are by no means scary competitive like some others in this thread, in Minnesota, they will be very tough events for all teams involved.
|
Re: Most Competitive Events 2017
Quote:
|
Re: Most Competitive Events 2017
Quote:
|
Re: Most Competitive Events 2017
Quote:
This thread is called the "Most Competitive Events", but the OP asks for the "most stacked" ones. I think those are different. Wisconsin won't have the storied, top-tier teams being brought up in this thread, but it will be a good competition that a lot of different teams could win. |
Re: Most Competitive Events 2017
The WPI district in NE is also quite competitive in the sense that any alliance could win. Last year it was #4 and #6 who played in finals. (Although this year I'd have to put my money on 1519)
|
Re: Most Competitive Events 2017
Quote:
|
Re: Most Competitive Events 2017
Quote:
However, since all of the FIM District events* have several unfilled slots now (i.e, many teams are waiting to see which event they will get), there is a strong likelihood that the competitiveness of any given event will change when the rosters are filled. Stay tuned. ----- *This also applies to many events in other Districts, and many Regionals. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:21 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi