![]() |
Re: Building a second robot - electronics?
Quote:
|
Re: Building a second robot - electronics?
It's worth it to have separate electronics for both machines, even with the expense. With FIRST Choice, it's easier to get a second copy of most components, and you can use PWM-based speed controllers across both robots to keep the costs down. If you switch anything between robots, maybe just switch the roboRIO if you can't round up the funds for a second copy.
It's far too valuable for most teams to withhold 30 lbs of whatever contacts the game piece -- this is an easy way to make sure both robots behave as close as possible and allows easier updates between competitions. We've taken this approach for the last 2 years. |
Re: Building a second robot - electronics?
Quote:
|
Re: Building a second robot - electronics?
For the purposes of driving a second robot in your home lab, it does not have to be any particular D-Link or OpenMesh router - any WiFi router that you can power from on-board the robot and that can provide IP addresses for your RoboRio and your driver station laptop will work.
Keeping with the thread topic, 2706 made it a priority early on that we were going to build two copies of our robot for drive practice (and also wiring practice, fab practice, etc.). We received one complete RoboRio control set in the rookie kit last year and one of our mentors was generous enough to buy a second whole control system to donate to the team. Our two robots were virtually identical except one used Victor SP's and the other used Victor 888's - most sourced from vouchers and/or FIRST Choice. Edit: here's a better photo of the twins |
Re: Building a second robot - electronics?
Quote:
|
Re: Building a second robot - electronics?
Quote:
In the grand scheme of things it didn't make a big difference but yes, the two robots behaved slightly differently. In this game it was largely about pedal-to-the-metal driving whether it was to fly over a defense or get to a boulder, so it didn't have a big impact on our driver training. We thought about making adjustments (squaring the inputs, etc.) but decided it didn't really matter. |
Re: Building a second robot - electronics?
Quote:
|
Re: Building a second robot - electronics?
Hi, I am one of the Electrical lead from team 4085. I was wondering if any of you knew if there was a replacement for the talons srx's. We want to find a cheaper and/or more realiable option. I have searched the internet but could't find anything better. If you have anything, please let me know. Thanks
|
Re: Building a second robot - electronics?
Quote:
|
Re: Building a second robot - electronics?
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Building a second robot - electronics?
Quote:
EDIT: Thank you Bobby! I didn't know that, my team has always used Jaguars with PWM before we switched to Talon SRXs. |
Re: Building a second robot - electronics?
Quote:
|
Re: Building a second robot - electronics?
Quote:
|
Re: Building a second robot - electronics?
SPARK motor controllers are a very good option. Their performance and size is similar to the older Talon SR, which has proven reliability over many years of service.
The SPARK was unproven at the beginning of 2016, but our experience with it during the past 12 months of intense practice has convinced us that it can be trusted. We have bought several more since building Sparky. We used them on demonstration robots all year, and plan to use them again in 2017. |
Re: Building a second robot - electronics?
https://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/s...hreadid=152711
Looks like they've released a new CAN controller - SD540C. Good pricing too and integrable with a network of SRXs. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:24 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi