![]() |
Is the Boiler worth it?
I can't seem to figure out a reason why you'd wan't to go for the steam over the gears. You gain points in a much more efficient manner with the gears. If you get all the rotors started you get a minimum of 120 points with a qualification point in teleop. With the steam, you get something like 40 points and a ranking point for 120 balls shot in the high goal. With a processing rate of 5/s, that comes out to 24 seconds of just processing and that's not accounting for the chance of you missing and collection time. It just seems extremely inefficient compared to the gears. Is there a maximum on the kPa you can have?
|
Re: Is the Boiler worth it?
There are two main answers:
-In higher level (and perhaps slightly above average) matches, you don't need all robots on gears. You only want to devote the minimum resources necessary to the gears, and capitalize in other ways for points (balls or hang). -You get a ranking point for 40kPa. Ranking points are immensely valuable, as I'm sure that you've recognized if you've looked at FIRST STRONGHOLD. This RP might even be achievable in autonomous (if you are a high goaler with a speedy shot) by triggering a hopper and shooting, as the point values are boosted. Regardless of if you don't quite make it, this gets you in close proximity to the needed 40kPa. tldr; Ranking points are important, slightly above average alliances don't need all three robots on gears. Additionally, while the kPa visual counter maxes out, their is no maximum to kPa you can earn. |
Re: Is the Boiler worth it?
So then can you earn an additional ranking point if you can manage another 40 kPa?
|
Re: Is the Boiler worth it?
The fastest way to get the boiler up will be to dump 50 balls into your robot from a hopper and stream them into the high efficiency goal during auto. Not easy, but fast. I think some teams will do this; i.e., the teams that go to Einstein.
|
Re: Is the Boiler worth it?
Quote:
1) What's going to settle the score when both alliances get 12 gears delivered? 2) If your alliance doesn't offload scored fuel, your opponents get it back. 3) If your alliance doesn't offload scored fuel into one of your robots, your opponents effectively get it back. 4) You've got all this room and still 6 weeks! Unless you've got some ultra-niche strategy, I fail to see how a team can 100% disregard fuel. |
Re: Is the Boiler worth it?
Quote:
|
Re: Is the Boiler worth it?
Also, the gears have a diminishing return. Assuming all in teleop:
Rotor 1 = 1 gear = 40 pts/gear (60 in auto) Rotor 2 = 2 gears = 20 pts/gear (30 in auto) Rotor 3 = 4 gears = 10 pts/gear Rotor 4 = 6 gears = 6.667 pts/gear Additionally, you have to deliver all but 1 gear, so that's 12 gears to deliver through the match, which may take a little while (average rate is about one every 10 seconds in teleop to get all 4 rotors). Factor in defense of various types, and you'll need to be pretty good at gear transport to get 4 rotors turning. Oh, and if you deliver 11 gears, you may as well have stopped at 6. |
The boiler can be important because if you get 40 kPa you get 1 ranking point. It takes 120 balls for high goal to make that 40 kPa. It also takes 360 balls to make it as well. But when in final they are then worth an additional 20 points.
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk |
Re: Is the Boiler worth it?
As said earlier, ranking points are king. The better you seed, the better your playoff alliance will be. If you're very good at getting that 40 kPa, you'll seed very well.
|
Re: Is the Boiler worth it?
Quote:
Rotor 4 = 6 gears = 6.667 pts/gear + 1 RP (qualify) Rotor 4 = 6 gears = 23.33 pts/gear (playoff) |
Re: Is the Boiler worth it?
One thing I've realized over the years is that relying on your qualification partners can be risky business. Unless you have a constant stream of information from your scouters throughout the tournament, many teams over estimate their ability. That said, we have been evaluating how our team can hold our own in matches.
It is significantly more feasible for a single robot to max out the pressure on the boiler, only needing one or two cycles depending on the robots fuel capacity and accuracy. A single robot is going to have a very hard placing the 12 gears needed to get the rank point for the rotors on its own. Assuming one gear could be placed in auto, that leaves about 10 second per gear cycle, while still leaving 15 seconds for a climb. A robot is going to have to move quick and avoid all defense. A boiler robot can guarantee the rank point on its own and has more protection while doing so. The tricky part is determining how many rotors need to be spinning to get enough points to guarantee the win as well. Arguably winning is more important than losing but filling the boiler. But being able to solo fill the boiler is also a very valuable alliance partner in playoffs. |
Re: Is the Boiler worth it?
Don't forget, to deliver a gear you'll almost always have to traverse the field. Fuel will be available in the hoppers and likely on the ground. Less travel time.
The boilers also have no upper limit. Once you've delivered 12 gears your done with them. If you don't have anyone in your alliance working with fuel you've capped the total number of points possible. |
Re: Is the Boiler worth it?
Quote:
It is going to suck when you do 3 preload + 6 cycles and your other 2 bots can't manage 3 collectively though. Be ready to bag out early. In fact (if you're playing with this level in mind), that's among the most important uses of fuel: when your coach is looking at the clock ticking down and realizing you're not going to finish that last rotor. If you need points before endgame to pull out the win, running insufficient gears is literally a waste of time. |
Re: Is the Boiler worth it?
Quote:
|
Re: Is the Boiler worth it?
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 20:45. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi