Chief Delphi

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)
-   Rules/Strategy (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   Climbing or No? (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=153418)

throwaway 12-01-2017 09:55

Re: Climbing or No?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris is me (Post 1629832)
If you are a team that can accomplish exactly one game task other than driving, I honestly think there is a strong argument for making that task climbing. (I mean, ideally a passive human loaded gear mechanism too, but if you had to pick just one...)

Considering that a barebones gear scorer can be very simple I think focusing on climbing is definitely the way to go.

A team can have passive gear intake and rely on the pilots pull of the lift to outtake the gear in this case your gear mechanism can literally just be a slot.

Devlin Moody 12-01-2017 10:14

Re: Climbing or No?
 
Excluding some of the new regionals I don't see the top ~6 seeds at a given event not being able to climb, and I definitely don't see their first picks not being able to climb. Once you get into the second round picks, [i]especially[i] at a few of the district events, I would be surprised if more than a couple can climb.

mathking 12-01-2017 10:18

Re: Climbing or No?
 
If you don't think that a majority of teams will be climbing consistently that makes it an even better goal to strive for. Think about it from a game theory perspective. If 50%+ of teams are climbing consistently at an event then you probably won't get picked for eliminations without climbing. Making climbing a necessary condition. If 20%- of teams are climbing consistently, and you can climb consistently, you almost certainly will be picked for eliminations. Making climbing a sufficient condition. (Even if you don't have a simple static gear scoring when you arrive, there will likely be teams willing to hack one together.) Even the absolute best fuel gathering and scoring teams will struggle to exceed 50 points in fuel in a match on their own. I don't believe there will many teams capable of getting 40 (going to 60 with the bonus) fuel points on their own but are unable to climb.

Kevin Leonard 12-01-2017 10:35

Re: Climbing or No?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mathking (Post 1629879)
If you don't think that a majority of teams will be climbing consistently that makes it an even better goal to strive for. Think about it from a game theory perspective. If 50%+ of teams are climbing consistently at an event then you probably won't get picked for eliminations without climbing. Making climbing a necessary condition. If 20%- of teams are climbing consistently, and you can climb consistently, you almost certainly will be picked for eliminations. Making climbing a sufficient condition. (Even if you don't have a simple static gear scoring when you arrive, there will likely be teams willing to hack one together.) Even the absolute best fuel gathering and scoring teams will struggle to exceed 50 points in fuel in a match on their own. I don't believe there will many teams capable of getting 40 (going to 60 with the bonus) fuel points on their own but are unable to climb.

I'll just say that climbing is lower on our priority list than being able to get 40 kPa on our own. That doesn't mean we won't have both, or that we'll have either functioning, but that 1 RP/match I feel is essential to maximizing ranking points.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:56.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi