![]() |
I use Zend's PHP IDE, i like because it has a lot of neat features.
www.zend.com |
AP Computer Science
Quote:
|
SQL
---->SQL<-----
by far the best. watever ur doing it, do it in SQL. u won't find anything more logical, easier, and more useful ASP.NET VS.NET JAVA C++ VB6 |
Quote:
Quote:
Second of all, you do understand that you're lecturing a person who wrote and maintains more than a few programs to perform various tasks concerning the Innovation First control system for Linux about Linux and programming, right? I mean, not that I consider myself knowledgeable enough to refute any of your statements, or even to properly respond, but it seems to me that from a spectator's point of view, if you actually did realize the facts stated above, you were just being condescending and intentionally offensive when you cited a link to a "Linux for newbies" page... Not very cool, in my humble opinion. And even if you didn't know, you're acting as though you're superior, and are pointing a n00b in the direction of a manual, dismissively. Again, not very cool. Whatever... I like PBASIC. Or C. I use PBASIC more. |
<?php
echo("php rocks!"); ?> |
Quote:
maDGag: what do you mean as vs.net? isn't .net a platform? |
Quote:
I'm still confused by your train of thought. |
TI Basic, my friends...:D
|
Hmm
It is kind of a tie between C++ and Java, but I'll say C++
main(){ cout << "I use C++! Bow before my fictional might!\n"; cout << "Bwahahaha!"; return 0; } |
What language did Steve jobs created that is used today?
Quote:
Quote:
The computer world includes and not exclusively only: Software: Games, Operating Systems, Language design and what not. Language design, again can be broken down into sub categories. I do not think it's possible to compare Steve jobs with Bjarne or the Xerox team. All of them are important in their particular field. FotoPlasma, his reasoning does not attack my statement. My statement, I when I stated I assigned it as true. When he disagreed to my statement he did not provide any adequate proof to change my statement to false. But his reasoning could have provided proof to challenge, in my opinion, the statement, "Bjarne is the most imprtant person in the computer world". If i stated that statement rob's reasoning would make that statement false, thus making rob correct. But the problem is that i have not stated that and he has not challenge my statement. When i say challenge it means when you try to change the current statement value (FALSE or TRUE) by taking into account of the statement you presented. here is how it would look like in C PHP Code:
|
How about we go back to 'your most prefered programming language' and just forget about it?
|
Anyways, my the language i really like the most is: C/C++.
|
Favorite Programming Language? How about two?
Other: ANSI Standard C or NEXTSTEP's Objective-C (specifically, the version currently used by Apple)
You gotta love procedural programming. Unfortunately, no one knows how to use it properly anymore, you can't have C++ geeks programming in C and also expect the code to come out clean, or the programs more efficient. When it comes to Object-Oriented languages, take Objective-C, the most versatile, best-designed object-oriented language available to date. Messaging wins over functions as class members any time. The other thing, run-time typing; id allows you to specify a type to be resolved at run-time, allowing more freedom in your code. - DB Um, I understand that PHP, Perl, Ruby, Small Talk, and the rest are considered 'scripting languages', and cannot truly be used to write Real programs? Or am I wrong? |
Re: Favorite Programming Language? How about two?
Quote:
it allows you to "cast" a type at run-time? i think C++ can do this with dynamic cast, but i am not 100% sure and if you are talking about OO, do you think casting shouldn't be a part of any good OOD? I think C++ is better since both Objective-C and C++ support RTTI. Unless resolved at run-time means something that isnt RTTI |
[i]id[i] as specified by Apple, is a pointer to an instance of a class.
Resolved at run-time refers to the fact that the reciever of a message does not know the type of an object until it is passed one at run-time. However, it is also possible to require a specific type, to enable better compile-time checking, and this is highly recommended. Here's the format of an Objective-C message, with 2 arguments: [myInstance arg1:(id)foo arg2:(UniChar)bar]; - send a message to myInstance, which, we assume has been defined such that it can recieve it. Arguments are: foo, which is of unknown type, and bar, which is of type UniChar. The above is the moral equivalent of function(void *arg1, UniChar arg2); id differs from void, I'm just not entirely sure of the how at the moment. I'm still somewhat new to Objective-C. - DB |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 18:19. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi