![]() |
Re: 2 cim vs 1 cim
Quote:
|
Re: 2 cim vs 1 cim
Quote:
Cheers, Bryan |
Re: 2 cim vs 1 cim
Quote:
|
Re: 2 cim vs 1 cim
Quote:
|
Re: 2 cim vs 1 cim
Quote:
However, for this year and years like 2013 and 14, I would never run just 1 per side. Driving is an important aspect of this year's game. At the very least, it needs adequate power in all situations before even thinking about added weight issues with functions of the robot. |
Re: 2 cim vs 1 cim
Quote:
The facts you refenced are sound but it doesn't follow that 775Pros are the wrong answer. I believe a lot of top level teams will have great success this year using the 775Pros in their drivetrain. This year weight is probably not the huge driver that it is in many years so I don't suppose it will be as common as it would have been if teams were fighting for every gram. Even so, I would not make blanket statements predicting failure when I don't think the data necessarily support this conclusion. FWIW, you will have much less margin for error when it comes to overheating your drive motors but that does not mean that good teams with sound engineering can't find a way to make it work. Dr. Joe J. |
Re: 2 cim vs 1 cim
Quote:
We actually have an AM Supershifter setup where we modified one side of the transmission plates to add the 775pro. In the past we've gotten away with the 1 AM Planetary 1 CIM setup and it was fine also, back when the no. of CIMS that could be used were much less and we needed them for other functions of our robot. We have tried running 775-550 with Planetary combo before. That didnt turn out well. The drive sounded nice, but stalled out very quickly. |
Re: 2 cim vs 1 cim
Quote:
Most teams are lower-level and have plenty enough on their plate just to get a robot functional. For those teams, an all-CIM drivetrain is dead simple obvious, and is the correct solution for 99.5% of the time. It's appropriate to make blanket statements for the benefit of those teams, rather than to make every single team do a detailed analysis. |
Re: 2 cim vs 1 cim
Quote:
|
Re: 2 cim vs 1 cim
Quote:
I suppose I could've included all those caveats, but the last thing I want is a young team smoking motors on the field. |
Re: 2 cim vs 1 cim
Quote:
|
Re: 2 cim vs 1 cim
Quote:
But as far as drive trains go, Bomb Squad's are about 12 years experience more advanced than the majority of teams, and I'm consistently amazed at their level of performance on the field. I'll modify my original statement: Without CAREFUL consideration, using a 775pro in your drivetrain is VERY LIKELY to overheat and become a fancy paperweight. I STRONGLY urge you to stick with cims and mini cims. |
Re: 2 cim vs 1 cim
We just had one per wheel. Committing 10 motors (4 drive, 4 steer, 2 tank) to the drive train is a lot to begin with. We would have been ALL drive train if we went for 2 775s per wheel. :)
We lost a few (<5 between practice and competition robots according to my memory). We theorize it had more to do with the impact from the defenses than stalling. The brush holders were breaking rather than melting/disintegrating. Just a theory, though. And thanks for the kind words. We sure like our swerves here in Mountain Home. :) |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 18:47. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi