Chief Delphi

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)
-   Rumor Mill (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=15)
-   -   There will be goal(s)! (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=15506)

D.J. Fluck 17-12-2002 12:17

Quote:

Originally posted by Tim_Wochomurka
Traction... could this mean Ice or something?
I highly doubt ice. Ever been to a hockey game?? They would have to keep the competition site that cold throughout the whole competition weekend. Many venues are not equipted to carry air equipment required to freeze the ice, so then they would be forced to buy or rent them and that would cost extra $$$.


Im sure ice is out of the question.

Madison 17-12-2002 12:36

Well, without any traction, our robots wouldn't move :)

(Shy of building flying/floating machines, anyway)

AdamT 17-12-2002 12:55

Quote:

Originally posted by M. Krass
Well, without any traction, our robots wouldn't move :)

(Shy of building flying/floating machines, anyway)

That's it, we figured it out...flying machines.....



------------------------------------------------------------------

Yes, the square WILL go through the circle hole if you push hard enough!

Chubtoad 17-12-2002 14:31

I heard that there may be incidents when operating the "robots" where FRICTION might exist!! Then another person ::wink wink:: told me that the entire thing might be frictionless, so nothing could go anywhere!!! THE POSSIBILITIES!

Jnadke 17-12-2002 15:39

Quote:

Originally posted by Chubtoad
told me that the entire thing might be frictionless, so nothing could go anywhere!!! THE POSSIBILITIES!

A truely frictionless surface is virtually impossible.


Besides, if it were frictionless, you could use airjets to move around. (fans, etc).

Rob Colatutto 17-12-2002 16:36

Quote:

Originally posted by Jnadke
Besides, if it were frictionless, you could use airjets to move around. (fans, etc).
now thats an idea....mount solenoids on the back of the bot to fire in short bursts to propel the robot

Chubtoad 17-12-2002 17:30

Quote:

Originally posted by Jnadke
Besides, if it were frictionless, you could use airjets to move around. (fans, etc).
I'm talking NO FRICTION, like NO AIR EITHER!! so therefore you would have NOTHING to propulse against! TOTALLY FRICTIONLESS!!!! NO GRAVITY EITHER!! CRAZY!!

Wayne C. 17-12-2002 18:26

Sandy Claws are coming to town
 
I heard that all robots would be powered by the potential energy of falling sand. Each machine will start the round with a reservoir of 100 lbs of beach sand and it is up to the teams to make the falling sand do the work to move the machine. Of course, since the sand weighs 100 lbs the rest of the robot can only weigh 30 lbs.

Robots can steal sand from their neighbors during one round to have an advantage for the next round. Sand falling on the floor is forfeit.

Of course the Placebo vacuum cleaner from 1998 will be reactivated for after round cleanup.

WC

Suneet 17-12-2002 19:14

Quote:

Originally posted by Chubtoad
I'm talking NO FRICTION, like NO AIR EITHER!! so therefore you would have NOTHING to propulse against! TOTALLY FRICTIONLESS!!!! NO GRAVITY EITHER!! CRAZY!!
I think it'd be tough building rockets with stuff from Small Parts. I hope FIRST has found a good aerospace supplies firm...

Sand! Of course! Sand would be an excellent propellant...

Jnadke 17-12-2002 21:16

Quote:

Originally posted by Chubtoad
I'm talking NO FRICTION, like NO AIR EITHER!! so therefore you would have NOTHING to propulse against! TOTALLY FRICTIONLESS!!!! NO GRAVITY EITHER!! CRAZY!!
No gravity = no mass. Nothing. Period. No competition. No students. No robot. It's impossible to have no gravity and still have mass. Gravity is the attraction between two masses.

Since there is nothing around the playing field (or even no playing field), it's safe to say there's no FIRST competition, since it isn't a FIRST competition without kids.


I'm still one step ahead of you... :D

Jack 17-12-2002 21:22

Quote:

Originally posted by Jnadke
No gravity = no mass. Nothing. Period. No competition. No students. No robot. It's impossible to have no gravity and still have mass. Gravity is the attraction between two masses.

Since there is nothing around the playing field (or even no playing field), it's safe to say there's no FIRST competition, since it isn't a FIRST competition without kids.


I'm still one step ahead of you... :D

Who said we would use the conventional laws of physics? We’d use FirstPhysics! - Here you can have mass w/o having gravity. Duhh... :)

marlon_jbt 17-12-2002 22:11

I heard that the robots will move! (Lame)

Seriously though, these comments are really mean.

AJ Quick 17-12-2002 22:17

I heard the machine needs to purify water, and generate electricity.

Keeping in mind that FIRST will own the rights to everything you do.

Gadget470 17-12-2002 22:29

Prototype Finished!!!

After compiling all the information leaks in this game, I have come up with the perfect solution!



You're all going down, because I'm going up!

SlamminSammy 17-12-2002 22:57

Quote:

Originally posted by Jack
Who said we would use the conventional laws of physics? We’d use FirstPhysics! - Here you can have mass w/o having gravity. Duhh... :)

What's your definition of gravity? Gravity is the result of mass bending space-time. It is the bending of space time. Modifying space-time could prove to be difficult, but if Dave's right (and they're using multi-dimensional wormholes) I guess they're going to need to solve that problem anyway to prevent multiple particles (and strings) from phasing into a singular form. Of course, FIRST could just use diamagnetic levitation to nullify the gravity caused by Earth (see Floating Frogs). Oh great, now my brain hurts :(.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 15:43.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi