![]() |
Qotw [01-12-03]: Changes to the competition, good or bad...?
Hi all. Now that all of you have a week to figure out the game and the kit of parts, and see the team updates, what do you think about the following question?
Question 01/12/03: There are all these changes to this year's competition and kit of parts... What changes you like, and what changes you want to see modified? Have fun~! And good luck with the 5 weeks left. -Ken L |
The [originally] easy scoring was great...
but the virtual stacks thing is just trite. WHY!? WHYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY would you create a rule JUST for a so-called "clever" strategy, but in actuality it's TOTALLY not in the spirit of FIRST. really SC8, SC9, and SC11 are the only rules i personally have a problem with... other than that i love the game. especially the autonomous control! whee! i was wondering when the programmers were gonna get to have fun :p *jeremy |
Re: Qotw [01-12-03]: Changes to the competition, good or bad...?
Quote:
|
I think the changes to the rules, the budget and the "complex" scoring are just things we are going to have to deal with. Even though they don't make everyone happy, that's life. It's real world stuff ... things that we, the students, will have to deal with in the future! Instead of complaining about how we want things changed, maybe we should be focusing on how we can work around it and on building a robot that will do well!
- Katie |
I didn't think we just have to "deal" with changes... Some of them are actually pretty cool, and would add a lot to the game.
Like the 2 new things introduced to the game this year: Variety of surface for robot to run on Autonomous period Those are likely going to add a lot of challenge in developing a drive train that work for all surface, and into the programming aspect of the robot. There are a lot more changes that are pretty good, but I just don't have time to name them all. Everyone is welcome to say what changes they like :P. |
definitely...
i'm not disputing the game being "fair". i'm just saying that some of the changes aren't (in my opinion) in the spirit of FIRST. i love a lot of the changes (auto. period, variety of surface, quasi-easy scoring, easy to build chassis...), but some of them need to be reconsidered... *jeremy |
Yep, with the new autonomous period, programmers actually have something to do now instead of making the same code every year =)
|
Quote:
- Katie |
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 13:42. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi