Chief Delphi

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)
-   General Forum (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   How high will the boxes go? (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=17109)

Yan Wang 29-01-2003 22:06

Lol, doing a stack of 2 then adding, then adding, etc, is such a waste of time...

And I won't comment on the stabilizer thingamajig, though of course people would need some way of stabilizing it.

Harrison 29-01-2003 23:10

Quote:

Originally posted by GregT
An infinate stack of bins has an infinate mass. Do you have a way to stop them from collapsing and sucking the entire universe into them?
You'd probably get a Delphi Award for that :p lol

Our bot builds a stack of 3 within itself, and can support that (and drive around w/ it, etc)....But we can build higher than that, just beyond 3, the boxes at the top would no longer be supported.

Realistically, we'll have a minimum of 3 all the time....and if we need to, we can go "indefinately" higher.

laurence 30-01-2003 14:49

stability
 
Has anybody tried stacking bins 10 high? The things aren't that stable, meaning a small jolt brings them all down.

Yan Wang 30-01-2003 15:04

Yes, most teams realize that which is why most teams who want to stack high are developing stabilizing devices.

Alex Forest 30-01-2003 17:31

Quote:

Has anybody tried stacking bins 10 high? The things aren't that stable, meaning a small jolt brings them all down.
we got to 12. theres a pic of that somewhere..in that other thread that was like this...

Doug 30-01-2003 21:55

1 Attachment(s)
these bins are mad stable just look at this picture else im just mad crazy.

Yan Wang 31-01-2003 16:34

I'd hate to point out the obvious, but if you've got your whole weight on top of those bins, that's a lot of force keeping the bins up. It'd be fairly hard for someone to knock it over as in the pic, though without you, it'd be simple.

Kyle 01-02-2003 21:37

some one on our team has stacked 13 and held it for about a min dose that count?

Cory 02-02-2003 00:23

Re: stack height
 
Quote:

Originally posted by oneeightytwo
+How about that stack of 200 Can you please explain to me (not robot design) how you are going to be able to get 200 boxes on top of each other? I'm having problems comprehending that!!!:ahh: :ahh: :ahh:
I belive he means that he will lift one box, place it on another, and then lift the bottom box. This will theoretically allow you to lift the boxes to an infinite height (not really, because they will tip, and eventually your stacker will not be able to support all the weight)

Cory

Jeremy_Mc 02-02-2003 01:45

i can stack 5! our robot can stack...err...i duno how many...

*jeremy

Ben Mitchell 02-02-2003 18:34

I think the highest stack in the game will be ~8 high, and stacks of 2-4 will be more common, anything higher will be a rarity.

ronnie_82 03-02-2003 17:01

how high
 
my team is trying to stack it to 11. thick, if you have five its 55, your better off keeping it even

hixofthehood 03-02-2003 17:07

Quote:

Originally posted by monsieurcoffee
Yes, most teams realize that which is why most teams who want to stack high are developing stabilizing devices.
I must be missing something. How can you stabilize bins without touching them?

Duke 13370 03-02-2003 17:40

Quote:

I must be missing something. How can you stabilize bins without touching them?
The bins only really need to be stabalized while the robot is moving them. When it sets them down they might, in theory, stay standing.;)

rust710 03-02-2003 18:27

Quote:

Originally posted by Duke 13370
The bins only really need to be stabalized while the robot is moving them. When it sets them down they might, in theory, stay standing.;)
In theory, but reality is an tottally different topic all together. One of which our team shouldn't talk about because we have no robot to test our theory's of reality in reality with.:D


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:56.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi