| FAKrogoth |
05-02-2003 21:43 |
You must understand: I wholeheartedly support the efforts of NASA and all the astronauts, including the crew of STS-107. I'm very grateful for the advances in nearly everything I enjoy that came as a result of space science. What I'm debating here is whether STS-107 should be considered different than the other NASA missions. Nearly everyone has agreed that these people took the same risks as the other shuttle crews. Does the fact that they god a bad destiny draw make them special?
If you answered yes, then that means that death makes more of a difference than intention. This mode of thinking would imply that manslaughter is the same as assassination. What makes you decide this way? I'm asking to get an understanding of your side, not to counter your stance or to be mean in any way.
As John Bono said, I am a creature of logic. I also (try to) take a holistic view whenever possible. I am not swayed by hordes of people saying something is the "right thing to do." However, I am capable of assimilating new data. If there is a reason why you feel/act a certain way, share it with me. At worst, it will be an interesting experience for all parties. At best, you might sway me to your side. In any case, say what you have to say wherever you deem it most appropriate, and don't expect less from me.
[edit]In the midst of writing this, John Bono apparently created a new thread for such things. From here on out, discussions on life and death will be taken there, and this thread will be reserved for NASA stuff. Thanks for my cooperation.[/edit]
|
