Chief Delphi

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)
-   Chit-Chat (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=14)
-   -   Order of Team Numbers... (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=20322)

marlon_jbt 18-04-2003 15:23

Order of Team Numbers...
 
People, 2003 being my first year in FIRST, I don't know much about the past history.

I was looking at the book about the 2002 and the 2003 games, and noticed that the earlier team numbers do not go in order by the rookie years, like I thought they would/should.

Like, for instance...

Team 1's rookie year is '97
Team 45's rookie year is '92 and
Team 21's rookie year is '98.

What gives? In the past, did FIRST let you choose your own team number up to a certain digit? Is my theory correct? Is this all a huge error that desperately needs to be corrected?

srawls 18-04-2003 15:34

In FIRST's early days team numbers changed from year to year. Also, sometimes when a team changed sponsers, they changed team numbers. I don't know which year FIRST changed to permanent numbers, or what rule they used to determine who got which number, but that is the basic answer to your question.

Stephen

PS. I've only been in FIRST for 3 years, so I am relating this information based on stories I've heard. Perhaps someone more steeped in FIRST lore can fill us in with details?

robot180 18-04-2003 17:10

I heard that there were 800 teams this year. The team numbers are up in the thousands.

D.J. Fluck 18-04-2003 17:29

Quote:

Originally posted by robot180
I heard that there were 800 teams this year. The team numbers are up in the thousands.
Note: many teams have dropped out over the year and they never gave rookies team the old numbers that aren't in use anymore.


Back in 1998 FIRST renumbered and grouped their teams by sponsors, alphabetically I believe

in 1998 Team 1 was sponsored by 3-Dimensional systems(?) (I think thats the name of that company)

21 is sponsored by Boeing I believe

Teams 44-49 (in 98 were all Delphi teams)
Now only 45 (Technokats), 47 (Chief Delphi) and 48 (Delphi E.L.I.T.E.) remain as Delphi teams.

64-68 are GM teams, Gila Monsters, Huskie Brigade, Willow Run HS (I think they are known as the Flyers this year), HOT team and Truck Town Thunder.

Team 69 is Gillette

and then 108 and 111 are Motorola Teams
---------------
Originally our team (45) was team 31 in 1997 and then became 45 in 1998. Kit Gerhart would be the right person to ask since he has been involved since 1996-ish

AJ Quick 18-04-2003 17:46

I heard the numbers were ordered alphabetically from 1992-1998. Depending what the first letter of your team name or sponsor name, that is the number you recieved for that year. In 1998, they changed it and allowed all teams to keep the number they have, so they would no longer change. So, if your rookie year was 1998, and your name started with an A you very well could have been team number 1.

D.J. Fluck 18-04-2003 18:31

Quote:

Originally posted by AJ Quick
I heard the numbers were ordered alphabetically from 1992-1998. Depending what the first letter of your team name or sponsor name, that is the number you recieved for that year. In 1998, they changed it and allowed all teams to keep the number they have, so they would no longer change. So, if your rookie year was 1998, and your name started with an A you very well could have been team number 1.
There were no numbers until 1996 (I believe thats the right year)

Jeff Waegelin 18-04-2003 21:47

Does anyone know what the highest team number was in 1998? I know my team (201) was a late addition, so it's around the low 200s.

D.J. Fluck 18-04-2003 22:21

According to the 2000 program (oldest one I have) the last team that was a rookie in 1998 was 208...209 is listed as a rookie in 1999

Wetzel 19-04-2003 04:10

In 1998 they ordered the teams alphabeticly by sponser. Since then, you get a number based on the order you sign up in. Teams that drop out do not have their numbers reassinged.
Some teams have droped out and come back and gotten their number back. RIT got 73 back this year.


Wetzel
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Floop is a madman.

D.J. Fluck 19-04-2003 10:47

Quote:

Originally posted by Wetzel
Some teams have droped out and come back and gotten their number back. RIT got 73 back this year.
Team 35 had a team several years ago, and they re-joined FIRST this year and got their team number back. That is what I was told by one of their drive team members...

Matt Attallah 19-04-2003 11:07

Yea, that is how we got our number - 5!!

AFL!! (our sponsor rocks!)

robot180 19-04-2003 11:57

My team is 180 and our rookie year was 1998. Team 179, Swamp Thing and our team, 180, SPAM, were both started by Pratt & Whitney.

George1902 19-04-2003 22:06

Quote:

Originally posted by robot180
My team is 180 and our rookie year was 1998. Team 179, Swamp Thing and our team, 180, SPAM, were both started by Pratt & Whitney.
even better:

teams 173 through 181 are all sponsored by UTC

i think it would be neat to see all the UTC teams at the UTC regional one year...

what do ya think, SPAM and Swamp Thing? how's a trip to new england in early march sound?

*imagines a frozen SPAMcicle on a stick*

Da SPAMinatress 19-04-2003 22:12

Quote:

how's a trip to new england in early march sound?
oh man, i would be soo in for that... except i won't be on the team next year :(

bah.. college... what was i thinking? i could be a bum or flip burgers the rest of life...

/me thinks not

Koko Ed 19-04-2003 23:12

I been an X-Cat for only two years so I don't really know how the numbers were dealt out "back in the day" but I saw one of our old robots has a 27 on it and another is a 151.
Very confusing.

Joe Matt 19-04-2003 23:26

I hope FIRST never changes team numbers again. Somehow, MOE as 293 or something like that dosn't seem right...

Brandon Martus 20-04-2003 02:47

Quote:

Originally posted by JosephM
I hope FIRST never changes team numbers again. Somehow, MOE as 293 or something like that dosn't seem right...
Think of all the people with #'s in their domain names.

soap108.com .. feds201.com ..

that'd be a nightmare (for the teams).

Clark Gilbert 20-04-2003 12:11



Chief Delphi Robot 1997

One thing I did hear on our field at Nationals that kinda shocked me was that the announcer said "Well see...since these teams have lower numbers they've been in FIRST longer." (it wasnt exactly like that, but close) I was actually kinda shocked that it was said by someone working for FIRST.

AdamT 20-04-2003 21:53

Quote:

Originally posted by Clark Gilbert
I was actually kinda shocked that it was said by someone working for FIRST.
Not EVERYone from FIRST is a diety....:yikes: The statement is very true, even though teams under 208 were mixed up at one point or another, they've still been around the longer. All those teams have been around since 1998 or before.

Of course, he still may not know about the switches before 1999.

Pin Man 20-04-2003 22:24

Our original number was 23, then 47(I think), 63 and now 88...

robot180 21-04-2003 18:21

I don't think that SPAM's has ever changed. This is my first year though and maybe I just didn't hear about the change.

AJ Quick 21-04-2003 19:13

We used to be team 4.

dez250 23-04-2003 12:49

food for thought...
 
back in 1999 when our sponsors changed and schools involved in the team and team name changed we got a new number, 250. befor ethat i am not sure exactly what number we were, i think we were in the mid 20's, but we are an origional team from 1992. now how is that for confusing. we are an origional team one of six left an our number is in the mid 200's. we have never missed a year of competition either.

~Mike

Ryan Dognaux 23-04-2003 22:18

Does anyone know where the first FIRST team is/was from??

Katie Reynolds 24-04-2003 08:37

We were team 107 in 1997 (our rookie year). In 1998, we were renumbered as 93.

The reason there are 800 teams, and team numbers are up in the thousands, is because FIRST doesn't reuse numbers of teams not competing anymore. If they did, that would be a nightmare! He he - think about it: the announcer at a competition says, "And rookie team number 2 ... ..." Yikes. Not to mention the fact that it reissuing lower numbers to rookie teams would probably confuse a lot of people who have been around for a while! :yikes:

- Katie

AJ Quick 24-04-2003 17:34

Well the whole changing numbers thing was a bad idea. They should have always just stuck with the static numbers that they do now.

dez250 24-04-2003 17:37

i think so also AJ because you go to an event and you see a team labled a rookie when they have been here for 10 years and just changed sponsors so there number changes and they are a "rookie" again.
~Dez

Jeff Waegelin 24-04-2003 17:40

Quote:

Originally posted by dez250
i think so also AJ because you go to an event and you see a team labled a rookie when they have been here for 10 years and just changed sponsors so there number changes and they are a "rookie" again.
~Dez

I don't think FIRST requires teams that switch sponsors to switch numbers anymore. I believe that rule was eliminated in the 2000 season.

dez250 24-04-2003 17:42

yeah i think so now also but when we switched after the 1998 season, we changed numbers so in 1999 we were labled a rookie team when in truth our team has been here since 1992.

~Mike

AJ Quick 24-04-2003 17:47

Quote:

Originally posted by Jeff Waegelin
I don't think FIRST requires teams that switch sponsors to switch numbers anymore. I believe that rule was eliminated in the 2000 season.
Yes.. but is it possible for your sponsor to keep your number, and sponsor another school?

dez250 24-04-2003 17:50

i know this year we kept our number as a team and we had 3 more schools join the team, but if you mean a team go no more and a new school picks up and gets that sponsor and they get your old number, then i dont know, that would be wierd.

~Mike

Jon K. 24-04-2003 21:58

I know RAGE has been around since 95-96 somewhere around there. And i am sure that the UTC teams during 98 were like that because they must have taken the UTC not Pratt or the subsidaries and then gone from the oldest team, us, to the newest team 181. But back a few years ago we were around 141'ish and have been 173 since 98'.

marlon_jbt 27-04-2003 22:52

Thanks
 
Looks like I finally have the answer here.

Hmm... makes me wonder. Why would FIRST organize the team numbers by the sponsors? Why not High School names?

I sort of understand. You must respect the sponsor.

Hey, I'm finally a Junior Member!

Jeff Waegelin 28-04-2003 08:43

Well... most of the time, the sponsor is listed first in the official team name. If you sort alphabetically, the list ends up being arranged alphabetically by primary sponsor.

ellenchisa 28-04-2003 21:17

wow...it's all so complicated. So does that mean juggernauts weren't really teh first team?! Ahh! This confuses me....

Jeff Waegelin 28-04-2003 22:27

Quote:

Originally posted by ellenchisa
wow...it's all so complicated. So does that mean juggernauts weren't really teh first team?! Ahh! This confuses me....
Nope, but since they were around in 1998, when the current numbering system started, and their sponsor was 3-Dimensional Services, they came first in the alphabetical order, and got the honor of being Team #1.

Marc P. 28-04-2003 22:43

Team 38's sponsor was 9th Wave, which explains where we they are now. Since then, they've lost 9th wave and are sponsorless, aside from slight school and community support. Wonder what they would have ordered a team with no sponsor...

marlon_jbt 28-04-2003 23:47

Ellen
 
I thought the same...

It's really simple to understand. Start from the beginning...

If your sponsor was 1st Keys or something, you're team #1.

If your sponsor was Zyroast Lights... you're team #299 or so.

This changed in '99 when FIRST started going by the order that the teams registered, and the previous teams kept their number.

Who are the original teams?

D.J. Fluck 29-04-2003 00:01

Re: Ellen
 
Quote:

Originally posted by marlon_jbt
Who are the original teams?
FIRST recognizes 19, 45, 126, 190, 191 and 250 as the original teams remaining. 111 is technically an original team, but they are not recognized by FIRST

Quote:

Originally posted by Marc P.
Team 38's sponsor was 9th Wave, which explains where we they are now. Since then, they've lost 9th wave and are sponsorless, aside from slight school and community support. Wonder what they would have ordered a team with no sponsor...
They would be placed where their high school would fall in place

Jeff Waegelin 29-04-2003 09:34

A few (like 201) got tacked on at the end, too, because of late registration. My team had no sponsor, and our school is Rochester High School, so we would've been placed further ahead in the numbering, but because we were one of the last teams to register in 98, we were placed at the end, after the numbers had already been assigned.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:58.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi