![]() |
No, in fact, I didn't take any PLTW courses officially after interviewing some of the people who had taken them when I was in 8th grade. I sat in on the DDP course the first year during lunch and sat in on the electronics and also ddp during my free period this year. The course is taught fine, but I don't think it moves fast enough. But that's my opinion. For CIM next year, I've pretty much covered most of the stuff. The previous CIM guy (GregT) will be going off to RIT and not too many people next year will actually know how to use it (though quite a few will be taking the course). So w/e the course may teach, it's not a challenge. I decided to take two AP sciences next year rather than fitting CIM in.
|
Quote:
Quote:
I do believe that PLTW wasn't meant to cater to everyone's engineering education, but rather to clue others into this field. While it appears that this program wasn't exactly the type that would help you personally, your comments really make it seem as though the class is a waste of time for everyone. I really think a lot of FIRSTers could benefit, but what you've said almost makes it look bad simply because it was below your skill level and for no other reason. Quote:
I wish you would reconsider that statement - apparently there are more people involved in FIRST than you happen to realize that haven't previously had any kind of experience with actual engineering yet (or maybe they choose to have it that way). I don't know if your class was taught within your high school by high school teachers, etc., or how different it will be from the program here taught by Purdue University. Considering what you've mentioned about your program, including playing games in the classroom and other such activities, it seems as though your program is a gross outcast from the norm. Everything that I've heard or seen about PLTW has been successful, and it sounds as though yours was a failure - a failure to inspire the students by using the curriculum. |
like that of amandas post i would like to state that this course is not a program that should be looked at as just another class for joe teacher to come along and teach. PLTW is that of skills of college and it may not be fair for all schools because you may not have college professors teaching some of the classes or as in my case an nuclear engineer. it seems in your some cases the classes may be dumbed down due to a teachers lack of skills in that field. now coffee, i just want to ask if i was to give you a simple 3 throw lamp, could you draw a correct full schematic for that, because auto-cad itself and the DDP course is an introduction to schematics and multi-view and 3d drawings. now you may say PLTW is a waist of your time but as myself going to be a mechanical engineer i think that learning the correct way to measure stress and strain and moments of a bridge and also the basics and equations of thermodynamics may be useful in my future of college and also it gives me a large head start at NO cost (or in some schools a very low cost) of learning college material from a person that is qualified in his field, beyond that of a normal high school or prehigh school teacher , even that of a college professor.
~Mike just my ranting for now. |
any teachers out there?
Our school is looking to adopt PLTW in the next year but we simply cannot find a teacher capable of teaching it. Our current tech teacher/leader retired this year. There are simply no candidates out there to fill his place.
If anyone has a lead on a PLTW capable teacher in the central NJ area please let me know. And for those who have these programs- treasure what you have. WC |
Quote:
This program has spread like wildfire across the nation over the past 3-4 years. This is no mistake. It may not be optimal for all students, but it is an excellent program for many, many students who are interested in engineering and/or on robotics teams. Andy B. |
Quote:
|
I can't really speak for the experience of the students who have taken it.. since I come from depths of 'rural Ameirca'. However, some of my fellow teammates come in from a shool in New York State, and they aren't necissarily a significant contribution, however it is noticeable that they tend to grasp engineering concepts a bit better than the students without the classes from PLTW.
For me, I would be more than greatful to have ANY type of technical/technology class even offered to me. The extent that my school offers is a general introduction to Physics applications, and an introductory drafting course. (NOT CAD, drafting.. with paper and a pencil) |
PLTW
Well i've never heard of it. In me school (west islip n.y.) they offer many tech course our newest (starting this year) is called principle of engnieering or POE. POE is going to be the beginners look at all different types of engineering. Which is run by the lead robotics teacher. Our other tech courses consist of Autodesk inventor (CAD) Cisco1,2,3,and 4. Design, Drawing, and production (DDP). There are a whole bunch more but this is all i can think about right now. :cool:
|
Quote:
Lets see: CAD DDP Technical Drawing Electronics Communcation Systems There is a lot more but that is all I can think of. |
lol POE is actually a PLTW class, it was started in the early 90's (pretty sure then) at Shen in Clifton Park. And NYS has tried to start a tech cerriculum but really hasnt, they mainly have adopted the PLTW courses and used them cause they started in the capital region of NYS.
~Mike |
Like Chelly said, our Tesla Engineering Charter School (TECS) will be adopting the PLTW curriculum for the 2003-2004 school year. Even though we will only get the first year of the course, we are still taking it as it seems a worthwhile program. Chelly and I are the student representatives on the TECS board and because of that, we have had a good look at videos, brochures, etc. Everyone involved in TECS, (students, teachers and otherwise) is looking forward to using PLTW! :) We'll let you know how it goes for us after this next school year.
- Katie |
Quote:
|
Don't listen to yan. I find his attitude towards teaching him self funny, expecially since he took a java course.
His perception is of a program with a serious lack of teachers and administrative support. One teacher can not (and should not be expected to) teach 5 completely unique courses. This program is important. There are a large number of people who enter a engineering field thinking it sounds interesting only to find that it's nothing like they expected. They then soon realize that their 5 ap math credits didn't properly prepare them for the college ciriculum they now find themselves taking. This leads to the type of Engineer that has machinists try and hurt him/her. A very important thing people interested in Engineering need to realize is that you can't learn everything from a textbook. I've seen yan try and take a half inch pass with a large endmill through aluminum. It consisted of: Force endmill a mm forward. Wait for smoke to stop. Spray with oil. Continue until aluninum is melted to endmill. Clean endmill with centerpunch and hammer. Continue. The point is experience counts. Experience is one of the things that all the PLTW courses give you. If nothing else, they look great on a college (and job) application and sound very impressive in college essays. Learning to operate a CNC mill is something typically done in the third or fourth year in most college ciriculum, I learned how to operate a CNC mill my thrid year in high school. I took all 5 courses and found each very useful. Greg Oh, yan. Really think you know how to use Inventor? I'll send you a part to draw sometime. |
"One teacher can not (and should not be expected to) teach 5 completely unique courses."
Is that in reference to the fact that our teachers can't teach those courses well? Is one example the fact that you have to teach Mr Peters how to use the CNC? Though the course content and purpose is good, the course is not being taught well at our school. You yourself spend half your time in the course doing robotics. The other half consists of helping the teacher and part of it is also doing the required work (which you know takes very little time). I mean, the class gives you access to tools and material, but how much have you actually learned from the teacher? At DeWitt Middle School, the tech program there has gotten better and better. They just came back from the National TSA Competition in Florida and picked up the most trophies of the last 4 years: 3 first places and 7 finalists (our year we had 1 first and 5 finalists and we're just the only little middle school in NYS going)... The tech course at the middle school is a very good intro to engineering/technology and it is REQUIRED. Thus, it gives everyone a better idea of various technical fields and what courses they want to take in the future. I found that to be a better intro to engineering/technology and I think it was a much better course than the PLTW ones at OUR school. Anyhoo, you know what I think about PLTW at our school. Oh yeah, that Java course was very slow, but the teacher is arguably the best in the state at it and it was a good experience and at least I enjoyed it. Plus, you forget my real motive - suck up to her before I have her very hard calc class next year :) Heh, yeah, that milling incident wasn't for any purpose though :) That was just me and Alex having fun when we were bored... And btw, no aluminum got melted onto the endmill and there was no use of a hammer - just pretty smoke and lots of oil. very fun though :) You should see Nick's aluminum block now... schweet stuff. |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:35. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi