![]() |
Off-season popularity... Could this be a new trend for FIRST?
Everywhere I look there is new interest to start an off-season competition. I have yet to find a count on how many offseason competitions occur every year, but I know that number is continuously increasing.
According to Dean, FIRST wants to become a houshold name, an American pastime, an activity as familiar to students as Basketball or Concert Band. But here's the difference... basketball teams do not travel 200 miles to compete, they do it in a local town gym. Marching bands may enter small competitions at another area high school. Football teams get their local town and school communities excited by participating in Friday night rivalries. FIRST is different... we commute, journey, and make pilgramage to attend our events. Something that is expensive and exclusive. How do we then make FIRST a household name?? I think that someday, perhaps not in the near future but something that is inevitable... is to rid ourselves of huge regional competitions and hold events similar to the off-season competitions that are gaining so much popularity. FIRST would have a list of requirements to meet and perhaps send a representative to the competition to make sure things are consistant, but overall... it would be a lot cheaper for teams when it comes to registration fees and travel expenses. And it can be just as much fun! As with anything FIRST does, there would be numerous logistical problems to figure out... but what do you think? How could it work, what would be done, and how long before this becomes a necessity without changing the inital goals of FIRST? |
There are a lot more high school sports teams in each individual area than FIRST robotics teams. I can imagine that happening if, say, every other high school had a FIRST team. This would allow you to not travel more than 40 miles or so to get to 3 regionals. FIRST is relatively new and will take much time to expand to the extremity of sports teams.
Maybe what FIRST could do is have each team attend 3 regionals in their area, then the winners (teams winning awards included) go on to a bigger competition (about the same time as nationals), then the winners go to another one, and somewhere along the line there will be nationals, perhaps in the summertime. This would allow more teams to participate in general and have more competitions, but keep the numbers at nationals the same. |
I can definately see what your saying and i could see maybe 10 years or more down the road where lots of high schools have teams and regionals will be state regionals and then those will then transfer over to state competitions and then nationals. Unfortunately however this will limit how many teams can goto nationals and such and you wouldn't have a chance to compete with teams all across the country like we do now at regionals.
The other problem i could forsee is funding. Basketball teams dont have NEARLY the budget requirments of a FIRST team, and many teams have trouble finding funding in their town for one team let alone one for each high school in town. There will always be a place for invitationals and off season competitions. Even in things like basketball and baseball there are still offseason competitions and tournaments where teams travel around the country and play other teams. |
I think that one of the best aspects of having such large competitions is the fact that they do bring teams from all over. It is always amazing to hear how far teams have travelled just to compete in a FIRST event, and to narrow the spectrum of teams present at a competition would really make the competitions less exciting.
|
I don't think that this would be a great idea. Half the fun of the regionals is meeting people from- everywhere. If regionals were closer to where you were, and smaller, yea the competition would still be there but the chance to meet new people from other areas would start to dissapear. Yes, FIRST can be costly but that is also what fundraising is for. Maybe someday, if everyother school has a FIRST team this could be possible, but for how things are right now I think that it just wouldn't be logical.
Off season competitions provide the smaller, lower budget options to teams, and can be just as competitive. (though not official- but does it really MATTER if they are an offical regional or not?) |
Quote:
|
Well, to be a baller all you need is a Hoop ,a ball and a pair of sneakers
to play football all you need is grass and a ball But for First You need a Good 8k in parts and another 5k for a basic field and another 10k for an organized game Until those numbers get lower things will stay the way they are |
here's my idea:
what we might do is group 4-7 teams that are close to each other into districts. once a week 4 of the teams would attend a meet wher they would participate in 3 matches. these meets would take place until all the teams had been through all possible alliance- and competitor- match-ups. as i would never want to give up the large regionals (for the same reasons that kristen stated) and my idea would be insanely expensive for first to do on a nationwide basis, i think that the 'districts' should host thes local meets during the off-season. |
Quote:
|
A friend and I were talking today about the future of FIRST, and we think that eventually, FIRST will have regionals, then those winners move on to a more broad regional, such as east/west us, and different countries, then those winners finally move on to a huge, televised "final nationals", so to speak.
|
Quote:
I also agree w/ kristen.... Quote:
[My theory on that maybe off, but hey...] I'll still go to regionals and such if this happened, but it would ruin most of the fun...the other is indestructable knowing you helped build something that somehow might just help the future in some way. |
One of the major things that originally attracted me to FIRST was the diversity of the people that I saw at FIRST events. People came from all over the state, all over the country, and even from other parts of the world, to unite in a common goal and have a lot of fun in the process. I think that changing the format to more of a tournament style process would dilute that tremendously, and we would lose what I see as a major aspect of FIRST.
However, I do see what has been proposed in this thread as a viable option when FIRST grows to such a size where it would be unmanagable to run things as they are currently being run. This would need to be a gradual change, and FIRST is changing as it is growing. Let's be patient and cross those bridges when we come to them. |
i think i'd be a very angry girl if out of state teams couln't come to regiopnals near me for very apparent reasons. cough*look at my pic*cough
|
don't worry elyse. by the time that would actually happen, you'll be married to jim with little robotics kidlets.;)
|
I don't see why off-seasons comps have to be the only thing happening. In my FBLA chapter, we have workshops, where people get together and learn new things. Why not do the same for FIRST? Honestly, a FIRST workshop where teams meet at a machine shop, or just a school, and swap knowledge and/or memories. There doesn't always have to be a competition for people to meet. Sure, you could have a comp and do the same things, but this is just an option!
Andrew W.K. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:27. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi