How big will FIRST ever get?
 

All this talk of bigger and more regionals and bigger championships got me thinking. Just how big will FIRST ever get? I believe FIRST will reach a critical size beyond which it will greatly struggle to sustain growth. What that size is I'm not sure, but I'll take a guess at the end.

Some people were saying that the Championship cannot get any bigger because it is to hard to plan and run an event much bigger than what they run now. OK, that may be true. They say the size of their staff cannot handle too much more.

Regardless of what happens with the size or number of regionals or championships, FIRST will need more staff! If we do grow to 2000 teams or more, how will they handle 2000 kit of parts, and 2000 teams on a FIRST program, and 2000 people asking them questions on the FRC site and so on and so on...

They WILL need more staff! How much staff can they hire? This all depends on funding. I am not sure how much FIRST staff is paid, but I know our entrance fees cannot cover them and the rest of the expenses (too many to list here).

The previous two paragraphs are just one factor that will limit growth. There are many more that I will leave up to you to figure out. I do not want to ramble forever.

So, how big can they get? I say FIRST will never sustain more than approximately 2000 teams - ever! What do you think?

Raul

PS. How many of you remember Dean's goal of 2000 teams by the year 2000?

I almost think this should be re named "How can FIRST get bigger"

Lets break down what needs to happen at the Top.
-Design a new game every year.
-Control team registration
-National

Anything else?
I mean really.
"the kit of parts" I hear. How about a list of what things we are allowed to use along with a supplier list. We buy what we need. No kits, prehaps some vouchers to use at various venders. The vouchers could be in exchange for the Registration fee. Reg fees could be reduced if teams were responsible for getting their own kit of parts

"Regionals" are already pretty much run from the local level with FIRST oversite. Yea I will agree that if we need 200 regionals that they have to come down in cost. So less glitz, Maybe more on par with a High School sports final in a division.

"National" But FIRST can run a 250+ Team National already. (I am in the group that says we should qualify for nat's by winning at regionals)

What am I missing?

Whats the point of FIRST? I am fond of saying that my robotics team isn't about robots. I suspect that the same impact on students could be had with 3000+ teams using some of the ideas presented as we will have this year.

As for an ultimate number of FIRST teams?
Tell me how many HS football teams there are in the US. Thats my number for FIRST teams :-) (Of course we are international now...)

I forget when it is supposed to happen by but eventually there will be a FIRST team in every high school.

Well, that assumes growth is linear for all time which it most definitely is not (if it were, we'd at somepoint have more teams than high school students).

I don't think that the FIRST Foundation itself will be the limiting factor as to how large FIRST can grow. Honestly, there isn't a huge impact on FIRST by supporting one more team or even a hundred more. Yes they will need more staff but so far FIRST has managed to scale greatly without adding too many employees. And with more teams there will be more registration fees to help pay for more employees.

My main thought has been that it will be on the local level that it becomes difficult for teams to develop. There simply aren't as many sponsors out there as we would like. And after awhile we'll run out of all the possible sponsors. Now, I know Dr. Joe likes to bring up the example of Beatty and that there are lots of Beatty Machine like companies out there but, simply, not all of them are interested in sponsoring a robotics team. And FIRST is an expensive competition. At some point it's going to become very difficult for teams to be able to raise money and then team growth will slow.

Matt

Some good points Matt. Yes, our registration fees runs a good part of the FIRST Foundation all year (maybe even all of it).

For example, in some areas there maybe a high concentration of teams all looking for support from this set fixed amount of available dollars and support. Eventually the increasing demand for the same needed share of the pie will surpass the available support. Teams will most likely have to get together to either form larger teams or high schools looking to start teams will be forced to join existing teams. Teams "close" to one another (like in the same city) may end up combining to better use the limited set of reasources. However I find that unlikely unless there is also a high concentration of teams within the same geographical location that warrent the feasibility in doing so.

For example, I know at one point Pratt & Whitney (I'm not sure if they still do) want us on S.P.A.M. to basically become one team with Swamp Thing. Not that we don't like our Sister Team (they're awesome), but do you really want to travel for about one hour after an all nighter down at the shop or perhaps one of those 1 hour fall meeetings? Sure we would do it if we had to. But it would bring up other complexities like student transport from one county to another, different rules and regulations as we're obviously in different school districts, where the shop is, etc.... not counting the previous establishment of two known teams. What number do you choose? etc....though I must admit that would have been interesting to do.

Unfortunatly, the problem might not lie within FIRST, but more likely lies with sponsors. If you think about it, only a certain number of teams can spawn in a certain area, because of limited sponsors. Also, if you have multiple thousands of teams, FIRST will have to like seperate more than likely and become like normal sports where you can compete up to state, but after that there isn't much hope. FIRST has enough troubles running as many regionals a week as they do (and they work their butts off to do what they do now, ask anyone who works the competitions, they'll say how it is, ask JVN or Ken for example, I know that after 5 or 6 weeks, you get worn out) and it's hard to just get enough participation. As you grow too big, you also lose the value in it as well... unfortunatly there must be a cap... and I think we're pretty close to it, because with many more teams, the overall quality will go down and it'll be harder and less one-on-one interaction. To be honest, if we leveled off around where we are now, we're comfortable, but we'll almost definitly continue to grow, which causes problems as I talked about above. There are only so many sponsors willing to pay the fees, and those areas are quickly filling up or have been pretty much filled up, and FIRST can't handle that many more regionals. Plus, FIRST gives you a nice sense of being able to watch the competitions as it is now, and know a good amount of teams, with that many more teams, you wouldn't be able to keep up and watch multiple teams you know in one match, for example, and teams may not be able to network as easily.

Some data (shown below) for the past 12 years shows that our grow rate is starting to taper off. The numbers represent the number of teams that competed, not the number of teams that registered. Some teams sign up but drop out due to lack of funding or whatever.

Check out the % growth and how it has slowed down in the past two years. My prediction is that the growth will continue to slow down. There are 888 teams registered at the time I am writing this. It may even go above 910. But I predict we will have 910 or less teams actually compete in at least one event this year.

Raul

Growth
 

Raul

Assuming that the basic configuration of FIRST remains relatively unchanged, I think you might be too optimistic. As the bar continues to raise, it will require greater and greater resources to be competitive. I believe that this will cause the weeding out process to increase and I think that equilibrium will be reached below 2000 teams.

I discussed this with some of the FIRST folks at the forum this summer and suggested having a minor league where the costs would be lower and thereby appeal to a larger group of participants (similar to the CDI or the BEST competition). The reply surprised me in that at the present time FIRST is not interested in attacking the masses because they fear that they will choke on too rapid of growth. Their present direction is to keep the major league and thereby controlling the growth rate to a level that they feel they can handle.

FIRST has proven to be resilient and flexible, so it will be interesting to see how this whole situation plays out over the coming years.

Bill

Hidden in my reply above was the funding issue.

How much does a JV basketball team cost a school district every year?

How much does a robotics team need to compete in one regional?

What happens when said basketball (football,track...) makes "State"?

Money is found to send them.

Its a priority issue. Ultimately we (society) decides where we will spend what money we have. If enough of us believe that robotics is at least as important than <pick a sport> the money is there.

I think the long term model *has* to eliminate the idea of begging for money from local businesses. (Although I like the connection that is made when this occurs, business becomes interested in what a school is doing)

So let s keep changing the world. It won't happen this year, or even next but change can/will occur if we continue on our course. The more scholarships and college acceptance letters that have a basis in FIRST will help accelerate the process.

As for the data showing a flattening curve. We have shown growth in an economy that has been pulling back for two years. We showed good growth while the economy was high.
There are more factors involved *as long as we continue with the idea someone besides the school should pay for this*

Rant over. I feel better. I need to go read the hints for the next game again :-)

The Economy Confounds the Data...
 

Raul, Bill, etc.,

I would be a bit careful about projections of the current trend into the future.

There are a lot of confounding inputs that can mask the trend.

I am amazed, frankly, that the growth continued at all given the tight economy that we have had. With rumors of cutbacks, actual cutbacks, and rumors of even deeper cutbacks, I am surprized that the growth did not reverse.

Frankly, I don't think FIRST has helped itself with the game design in the past several years.

In my opinion, it is quite likely that the growth rate will pick up again with the economy. If FIRST puts out a TV friendly game, this thing could explode.

I have been saying it for a number of years, but I think that this upcoming year is perhaps the most critical year for FIRST in its history.

Joe J.

P.S. My guess is that FIRST (as it is currently configured) will top out at about 4,000 teams. That is basically 1/5 of all the high schools in America.

P.P.S. I think that a league based on the EDU kit could easily reach close to 70-80% of high schools. Time will tell whether or not FIRST will take advantage of this opportunity...

Re: The Economy Confounds the Data...
 

I agree with this.

I think that when the curtain goes up on January 10th, it will set the tone of how things will go for a loooong time. It just seems like this is going to be FIRST's opportunity to fix any problems they've recognized. (with game design, manual problems, etc)

Kickoff 2004 will send us a message, other than what the game is...

$.02

John

I think FIRST will create FIRST #2

If FIRST continues to grow the rookies will no longer have a chance to win anything!!!

for example you will have 800 veteran teams playing 150 rookies...

FIRST teams will not be able to get sponsers either since many companies all ready support several teams. The sponsers cant keep giving and giving!

I think FIRST needs to create a cheaper and more economic FIRST for schools that do not have the support

Example a EDU bot based FIRST kinda like the LEGO league.

I can see a possibility for a great change coming in FIRST.

Basically, I don't think there is really a cap on the growth of FIRST other than a set number of high schools. However, there is a limit on the growth of FIRST as we know it. I can see it becoming more localized. In order for it to spread to all school districts several things will happen.

First, the cost will have to decrease. For those of you familiar with OCCRA, this is much more cost effective for the participating schools.
Second, the events will have to become more localized and the cost of both attending and hosting the regionals will have to decrease. There would be more teams in all areas and therefore more competitions.
I can see it being like OCCRA just with nation wide participation and a FIRST-like build season. This would have the effect of creating a hierarchy like that of any other school sport (Counties, State, National, International?). There are pros and cons to this situation, but I see it as a possibility.

I just realized that people who are not familiar with OCCRA could get the basic Idea by understanding how FLL teams compete.

Darwin???
 

Some of these ideas sound like Darwin's Theory of Natural Selection. All these teams fighting for the same amount of resources, some live and some don't! :ahh:

One thing is for sure, any sport would love to have a "flat" growth curve at 13%. Imagine what would happen to baseball if the number of tickets sold increased by 13%, or the number of major/minor luge teams increased by 13%.

My prediction is that by the time that the high school class of 2004 has children (10-20 years) FIRST will have become mainstream, just like high school baseball and football.

Re: Darwin???
 

That is pretty much how it works though if you think about it. As for the OCCRA comment someone else made, I agree with what you're saying. I know of some other leagues that have spawned off as well. One program called "BEST" is a program made by people who used to be in FIRST but wanted to make a cheaper competition. The game is ONLY $500 for your kit and you pay a really low competition entry fee. The robots aren't nearly as big, but they still become complex, and I kind of like that they limit teams to just the kit they send you, so that all teams have to be creative since they all work with the same things, then after the year, you send the kits back and disassemble the bot and get your $500 kit fee back. I kind of like this idea because, to be honest, you can't really use your past years robots very much except for the actual game, maybe as a prototype for the next years, but after the game year, it pretty much becomes useless and can't be used generically. I think new leagues will continue spawn like this, and what I like is that you COULD join multiple leagues. Next year we will of course be in FIRST, but a teacher and myself are going to probably try to start a BEST program as well, for other students interested but can't devote as much time into a program like FIRST. Other more popular programs such as Battlebots IQ seem to show a good learning experience as well. I think that with time an equilibrium will be found, and all of these leagues can connect together and sort of function as one, yet work independently depending on what particular schools/areas can afford or want to build, creating more diversity and the programs are fit more to the individual needs of a group of people.

I have been keeping a close look at this tread, reluctant to reply with any comment, but like usual I have to throw my hat in the ring. I am mainly going to comment on the "sponsorship issue" What the majority of the posts have reflected is the cost involved to be in the FIRST robotics program. The cost I believe will start going down...

Know I know what you are thinking.... You are probably saying what is this guy talking about....prices going down...

Well Here is my logic behind it....
I think that the more teams that compete, the cheaper the fees will start to be for the team. For example: Schools that buy books for there classroom (every school in the world) pay companies that manufacture the books. If you buy 100 books it is a set price per book, lets say fifty dollars. Lets say the school id large and they buy a thousand books, the school will pay a cheaper price, somewhere around forty dollars a book. Now lets say they want to buy five books, they would probably pay seventy, eighty, or ninety dollars a book. So basically the more books that are bought the cheaper they are.

I am comparing this whole "book idea" to the FIRST society. I am saying that we are buying like "100 books" in the example, the more people involved the cheaper the cost will get. Thus creating a more economical program for everyone, and seeing many more teams joining FIRST and having more and more teams compete.

Another Way Costs Will Drop:
I believe we will see that television friendly game mentioned earlier on this topic. The question I think is not a matter of if, it is a matter of when. Once we get a game that if "TV friendly" we will see FIRST being broad-casted year round, and attracting more and more high schools to join FIRST. This in turn will lower the cost by FIRST receiving money for "selling" the competition to television stations, and getting large television corporation sponsors. I would not count it out that the cost of regionals will begin to drop in the next few years, as well as the cost of the robot kit.

Once we get team numbers up near 2,000 you will see financial support from the United States Government as well from other governments such as Canada's government. Personally I think that this is one of the best things that governments can do for the future of the country. It insures the future of the countries. The more learned the citizens, the more that country will strive. I would not be surprised to see government getting involved in the FIRST program, especially if it begins being televised on big television channels.

And another thing I would like to point out....
I do not believe that sponsors are not available. Just look at how many rookies we are having this year. The numbers show that interest and money is out there. I know personally that many teams that are underfunded, often by over ten thousand dollars do every possible thing to get that money. One team I remember talking to at a regional last year did fund raisers every weekend at a local business, as well as a year round fundraiser at there school. (In addition to their local sponsorship and school sponsorship) Overall I believe they made money in the neighborhood of eight thousand dollars off of fundraisers. If the interest is there the teams will find a way to keep the team moving financially.

So In Summary (I know many of you have lives and don't want to read through my long post)

-First Will Become cheaper the more teams that we have
-Television Stations become more involved in FIRST
-Government Systems Will Become More Involved
-Sponsors of teams are still available even in our current economy.

-Greg The Great


Just as a general statement, my opinions do not reflect Team Hammond or any of its sponsors.

And here I was under the apparently mistaken impression that the Government already was providing significant support for the FIRST program.

You're trying to say NASA is part of the Government?! Say it isn't so?! ;)

The only support is what NASA has deicded to shell out which is peanuts in comparison to what they do for other educational programs. And some of that support is on a "local" level, not "corporate" level.

"reality education"
 

Call me crazy.

I think the limit is some high fraction (greater than 50%) of the number of high schools in the country. 10,000+ teams.

It'll take a couple decades. Growth is occurring, but it is governed by a small group of enthusiasts and hard workers exciting individual schools around the country. So its gonna take some time. I'm not counting on exponential growth.

I know, 10k+ is a lot of schools. You're thinking, who the heck is going to pay for all of these teams? But here's my scenario.

The number of teams continues to grow slowly in the areas where FIRST has a solid foothold. Employers who need engineers are here, and they will continue to see that FIRST is raising the quality of engineers, scientists, and technicians. In order to compete globally, they need these people. Designing and developing new stuff - stuff that works, that people *have* to have - is what its all about. The employers are in it forever.

Many teams will be funded for the most part by these employers. I think there are many more employers left to sponsor teams, in all parts of the country. They just need to know more about FIRST and the impact it has.

In 10 years, having FIRST experience - in high school, and in senior year of college - will be expected of top engineering grads. Teamwork, first-time-quality, meeting deadlines, competitiveness, .... "What did your team do, Ms. Prospective-new-hire?" "You've been on our team for 8 years now Billy, and now that you have your degree, we'd like to hire you. You already know all of your co-workers and how to get stuff built in our shop. Heres your pocket protector and ID badge. Get to work." :)

But thats not all... School districts are realizing that "project-based learning" and "engineering 101" experiences are good for their kids. Principals are going to make sure they have a decent electronics lab, computer lab, and *OMG* they need to get a shop class back in the building because they need to build stuff for those electronics and computers to control. Drill press, bandsaw, lathe, mill, NC controls - YES, they're gonna need em. The labs and shops will satisfy the vo-tech crowd AND the college-bound crowd. This project-based stuff ("reality education") is imho trickle-down from what has been going on in engineering universities for over a decade now.

Parents (the ones who vote and pay taxes, the ones that make school boards jump) are going to realize that their districts need to keep up with the Joneses. They will vote for this stuff because, hey, last week on TV they saw a thing about some robotics comp and the kids were psyched about ... LEARNING! They're gonna vote for that stuff bigtime. Someday. After they hear about it or see it.

So additional funding will come from parents who learn about FIRST, learn that it takes some basic elements at the school to do FIRST right - math and science teachers, computers, electronics, a shop - and they'll vote for it. Right alongside the new football field with that cool fake turf. One district after another...

Other parents/schools, in areas where there are fewer hi-tech employers, will want to do the same things because they will see what the FIRST-aware high schools are doing. They will want to have this stuff in their schools too. So, as soon as they hear about it....

[this paragraph might belong in the rumor mill] Companies who want to get people's attention (yeah, all companies) are going to need other ways to advertise. Think about how much is spent on TV commercials. Well, once everyone has tivo and commercials are not so effective, once the shows themselves are saturated with product placement (love those Hummers on CSI, don't ya?), companies are going to need to spend some cash on other forms of product placement. This is where our cool robots (and cool robot games) come along. "Excuse me, Mr. Gatorade-seller, you want to give me $4000 in exchange for a 4" x 6" decal on my bot? It'll probably be on TV at the Detroit Super-Regional in March, and maybe at the Championships in April, and if we qualify it'll be in the International Robotics Grand Prix in Kokomo in June. I'll put it right under my (insert main sponsor here) logo. Can you give us a couple of cases of Fierce Grape? It's hot in the Superdome in April..."

I think people (companies, principals, districts, parents, advertisers) will pay because they want to. Its the American way isn't it?

Assuming, of course, we are exciting enough to get, and stay, on TV.

Ken

Re: "reality education"
 

Bingo, I think that in the next few years, once FIRST is ready to realize that it will grow big (very very big) they will make a TV friendly game, I am doubtful that it would be this year, but hey ya never know. Although your estimate seems high, I would not be surprised, that possible ten to fifteen years down the road, you may see team numbers up in the 10 thousand area. Although by then we will probably designing robots that are well more advanced then know, and that play a game that is going to have 5 or more "key aspects".

Just my input...

-Greg The Great

FIRST has been working on making the game more and more TV/spectator friendly. Does anyone remember Dean talking about that at the kick off? Does anyone also remember how he shed a tear saying the game wasn't fair. (And yet people still whined when it wasn't fair!)

I think the growth is going to continue at a steady pace until it becomes a real media spectacal. It's getting there. My team just had a story done on a local TV network even though we aren't building a bot right now and we didn't win big last year.

More teams!=cheaper (more teams does not equal cheaper). FIRST said long ago that as more and more teams were created, the price of registration would drop, however it hasn't changed that much, despite the growth. I think that they are intent on giving us the best kit they possibly can and that means it's expensive, so I have no complaints - however I don't see it getting much cheaper any time soon.

NASA, IMHO, is helping a lot. Maybe there are other programs that get more, but we're getting something, not nothing. And if I'm not mistaken, they didn't hand out all of their grants last year. Not because they are greedy or needed to cut back - but because not enough teams asked and qualified for them. Correct me if I'm wrong on that - it's what I was told. Anyway, NASA gives registration plus a chunk of change to get some parts and supplies. More money would be nice, but for rookie teams - I would curse NASA for giving them more because it would be a horrible crutch that they would become dependent on. So, Mike, unless you meant the government is the one tossing out just a few peanuts, I'll have to disagree.

Personally, I believe that as long as there are high schools without FIRST teams, FIRST can and will continue to grow. I think it might be possible to be stuck at a cap for some amount of time, but it will then begin to grow more.

Like Greg said, prices will go down the more teams that compete, and more sponsors will come from the woodwork.

Especially with TV coverage, because after all, what company doesn't want to be recognized world-wide?

Hey Matt, remember me?

You bring up a good point, as has been said. However, if memory serves me right, this was the first year a cap was placed on spending on the robot. From a team who has never been able to raise enough money for fancy carts, cool shirts, extraordiary buttons, or even a hi-tech machine, it's not so much the lack of sponsors. From where I sit, the problem is two-fold.

First, some teams have an innefective way of exploiting the event. ("It'll get kids involved in robotics." Yeah, that's what a stingy company wants to hear.) Most companies need a better reason than that it's technology in under-funded schools. While the platinum may be hidden, it is only he who turns the rock without destroying the precious substance underneath it who gains the wealth. Only when the team has alot of money do the realize how little they use in the FIRST game, but within the Chairman's award and presenting everything.

The other problem comes with a different type of donation, one that cannot be written off on a tax form: Volunteering. FIRST runs mainly from volunteer time and parts as we all well know. How many adults have spent sleepless nights working on their projects for FIRST? How many people stay behind at events to make sure nothing gets left behind? Not all that is wealth comes with dollars attached.

But back to the original question, FIRST will continue to grow as long as people are interested in tinkering, electricity, and exponential thinking.

I agree that this is the case with something you buy, but kit pieces are largely donated or already at an extreme discount. Other costs a team accumulates (metal, misc. parts, t-shirts) are not bought from a common sponsor and therefore it is impossible to buy in bulk. The major costs come from events and the cost of running the organization. Unfortunately both of these costs rise with more teams. There is no discount based on how many stadiums you rent and the model you describe is really not applicable to FIRST because of these compounding variables.

As far a TV broadcasts go, I have a hard time seeing big bucks coming from it. High school football is not popular on TV as a nation and FIRST shares a common inherent obstacle. People watch games where they can identify with a team. They follow that team and cheer for it. It is hard to have that kind of loyalty when the teams are 800 strong let alone 10000. Coupled with the fact that teams only play for 2 minutes every hour it becomes even harder. The best bet for a television show as I see it is to concentrate on the season as a whole, not just the matches. Shows like "Monster Garage" and "Junkyard Wars" are only %10-%25 competition because people are interested in the process. The game not only needs to be entertaining, you need variety in design, creativity and it has to blow people away. A flashy interface and presentation is also necessary. The problem with becoming a Discovery channel type show is that the money could be good or it could be nothing. Remember, the network has to make money for you to do well on a TV show.

Re: How big will FIRST ever get?
 

Sorry for bringing up this old topic, but I was just amazed at the difference in prediction vs. reality. FIRST isn't dying yet. :)

Re: How big will FIRST ever get?
 

Well, there certainly were less then 1000 teams last year. I'd say the predictions were pretty good, considering almost everyone else expected over 1000. This year there are less then 700 teams registered currently, so I'd expect Raul's prediction to be dead on, or optimistic.

Re: How big will FIRST ever get?
 

Joe

I agree. I think last year was about 927 teams. Raul came very close, particularly when considering the unknown factor of NASA sponsoring almost 200 teams last year.

FIRST has added 15 % more regionals this year or about 150 more teams.

Looks to me, FIRST is expecting a maximum of 1077 this year.

We shall see.

Mr. Bill

Re: How big will FIRST ever get?
 

Funny, I had the exact opposite thought. Reading the old posts, I was amazed at how many people were dead on with their predictions.

No one was claiming that FIRST was dying, people were just trying to determine where an equilibrium point may occur.

Re: How big will FIRST ever get?
 

I don't think has reached saturation, just that the economy has slowed down, and the businesses that support new and old teams are cutting back spending, or disappearing. So I guess there would be fewer team growth. Death isn't through shrinking, but through ideological failure.

Re: Darwin???
 

Our team has been competing in BEST for the past two years.
All I can say is that the students have gotten a great deal out of it.
It has only cost us travel expenses and next year we are going to start an Indiana HUB. This way we can help many of the schools around us get the robotics experience. Of course the robot is less complicated, and smaller.
But an entire hub's projected cost is around $30,000. That is the money necessary to purchase EVERYTHING for 25 teams to compete!!

This already has prize money built into it for the winners to help them go the Regional (National) competitions...

Sure, the trophies are less glitzy... the competitions look more like high school athletic competitions and not the FINAL FOUR..., but there is a lot to be said for not having to worry about where the extra money is going to come from when FIRST raises the bar (oops I mean...raises the COSTS..) AND they require money in advance...

I have hesitated to bring up BEST on this forum... I have found the people that run it amicable and they are ALL volunteers... BEST has only one paid employee..

If anyone is interested just send me a message...
Don't get me wrong I love FIRST and what it does... but we, along with many other teams are feeling the pinch... not only the pinch of our sponsors pulling out...or reducing their contributions ... but the pinch of the team advisors having to continually be on the search for more money.. its always more... more to FIRST.... more travel expenses... more equipment to be competitive... more more more...

enough, I will get off the soap box...
I would love to see FIRST in every high school but it will NEVER happen given the costs we see today...

thanks for reading

yours in robotics....

Bob

Re: How big will FIRST ever get?
 

FIRST can eventually be in every high school. Some others here have mentioned that it could eventually be like football and in the schools, others have mentioned that the cost would be a large problem, which it would but take a moment to think about this.

The average football team has about 25 kids on it. The personalized football helmets cost (with padding and upkeep) $75.00 a piece, pads run around $75.00 also, then you have shoes $50.00, practice gear (jersey, pants) $30.00. Right now it's $230.00 a kid. Multiply that by 25 and get $5750.00 a team. Our school (Rolling Meadows High School in Illinois) has five teams (Frosh A, Frosh B, Soph, JV, Varsity) That is $28750.00 for the football program in a high school, and that does not even include the field upkeep, announcing equipment, or bus fees for away games.

Yes some of these pieces of equiptment can be used for multiple years but so can some of the parts FIRSTers use to build robots.

With $28,750 spent on football programs I am sure a school can afford to start a FIRST team.

FIRST will eventually become big in this country. I see it doing great things for people and making the US a world leader in science and technology.

Re: How big will FIRST ever get?
 

You missed one big thing that football teams have an advantage over any other groups or sports: sales.

Time and time again football teams have walked over all other teams by getting equipment that isn't needed, or things that are just wasteful. Why? They bring in the money for the school through concession sales, ticket sales, and other sales. It's as simple as that. While it could be argued that robotics teams could charge admission, the problem falls back onto the founding principals of FIRST and it's mission.

If you do a search on the forums you will find many examples of what I have described, where leaky roofs and other things go the way-side as football teams get that nice new bus, or other things.

*end rant*

This wasn't meant to be aimed at you as an attack, so sorry if you feel that way, but I'm getting more than a little tired over the football teams. Of course, Sparky has won more awards the past 6 years than our football team has the past 12. ;)

Re: How big will FIRST ever get?
 

I have been raising this very point for years. Schools spend huge amounts on sports, but seem to have difficulty spending much on a FIRST program.

The rationalization is that sports programs bring in revenue. This is a complete myth. The small amount of ticket sales is a drop in the bucket when comparing the cost of a football team. You must remember to include all the equipment, the salaries of the coaches, managers, trainers, etc. as well as the cost to build and maintain the field etc. I would bet that the cost of an average size high school team is in the hundreds of thousands when figuring "all" the costs.

I am all for high school sports, but as Dean continually preaches, we sometimes are not putting enough emphases in the right places.

Re: How big will FIRST ever get?
 

You are seriously underestimating the revenue that the football program brings in.

I can't speak for everywhere, so I'll just describe how South Fork High School was at the time I graduated.

Ticket sales for games were huge. Admission was five dollars per person, and an average home game would have 2500 people attending (more or less depending on how many of the opponent's fans traveled with them). We had five home games that year. Our rivalry game was home also, but I mention it separate because everyone in the county came to it. We easily had 7500 attend that game. That's about $100,000 in revenue. However, only half of that went to football. The other half went to the general sports account.

Another soource of revenue is the football booster's club. They're main job on Friday nights was selling merchandise. The rest of the year, they got sponsors for things the team needed. We had banners for local buisinesses hanging all around the stadium. If a buisiness had donated a particular item (golf cart, score board, etc.), you'd know it because their logo was on that item. They also sold programs for two dollars each. And they sold ad space in those programs. Each football player and cheerleader was required to sell an ad.

This isn't including concession stands, because the band runs those. They get to keep whatever they make.


Our head football coach got paid $5000 per year for coaching. Assistant coaches got between $500 and $1500 for the year. Our managers were students who either didn't want to play or who couldn't due to injury. We didn't have a full-time trainer on staff, but someone with a local practice came in every afternoon. I imagine they paid her something.

Building the field was a one-time cost that the school incurred over fifteen years ago. It is also used by soccer, track, and other sports throughout the year. The school's Agricultural Technologies program maintains the football field, the baseball field, the softball field, and the golf course (yes, we had a three-hole par three golf course with a driving range and a practice green on campus).

Football is huge in Florida, so perhaps my school was a bad example. However, I do know that in most Florida high schools, the football program fully funds itself, and highly supplements the entire sports program. Perhaps teams should consider classifying themselves as a sport instead of a club. Maybe they'd be allowed to tap into the money that football brings in.

Re: How big will FIRST ever get?
 

Same here in Henrico County, VA, although it's just a little smaller.

Re: How big will FIRST ever get?
 

I think that money is the greatEST concern to any, and maybe even every FIRST team. Eventually, there will be a point at which donations just can't continue (unless companies give to FIRST instead of local charities, believe me, that is not all good). In addition, it will take a significant manufacturing potential to make, say, 10,000 kits of parts. Furthermore, nationals will be less and less accessible. "Back in the day" it wasn't so hard to get to nationals, but if there are 3,000 , 5,000, or even 10,000 teams, it will get increasingly harder to get into nationals. I am one who says "give the underdogs and rookies a chance to experience the fun of the national event".

Another option is for the national event to change, and have 6, 8, or even 16 separate fields for competition. This may present a problem, but there is no problem in using the outdoors of Atlanta to have a competition. There is also plenty of undeveloped land belonging to Disney World. The Dean Center for Technology??

Re: How big will FIRST ever get?
 

The government should be sponsoring FIRST. To some extent, it does already, but if FIRST is really going to become commonplace nation-wide we need government funding. The federal government, could, in my opionion, make no better investment then sponsoring FIRST teams in every highschool in the country, for reasons that all of you are aware of.

That being said, a cool alternative would be FIRST teams designing a building arcade machines, undercutting the commercial operators... :D

Re: How big will FIRST ever get?
 

I have two points to make. First, expanding FIRST to every high school in America would be a incredibly massive undertaking. There's on the order of 30,000 high schools in the US. Let's assume $10K per team and $125K per regional and 45 teams per regional. We'll assume 15 weeks of regionals (triple the current 5 weeks) We then have:

$300 million in sponsorships to teams.
$83 million in sponsorships to regionals.

667 regionals in a year.
45 regionals a weekend, and thus 45 fields, trucks, and sets of event staff.

Not to mention the production and distribution of 30,000 kits a year. I can't easily estimate the dollar value of parts donations and discounts this would represent.

This is assuming teams only attend one regional, as well, and attend only a nearby regional. With almost a regional every weekend in every state, I think that's a safe assumption. That said, I think it's safe to say that FIRST could not expand to every high school in the US in its current form. Overhead costs and organizational challenges would be very difficult to manage. Not to mention finding that much sponsorship. And note that doubling or tripling the size of a regional would only somewhat mitigate this effect. I beleive that to expand this much, FIRST would have to change to some sort of rolling, year round competition or have groups of teams put on their own regionals or something. It would definitely need a radical organizational shift to achieve this.

My second point. Does FIRST really need to be in every high school in America? It would certainly not be a good fit for some high schools like those that focus on arts or other things that don't really work with FIRST. Some of these high schools are small rural high schools where a team would comprise a large percentage of the student body. I'm sure there are other reasons here as well. I don't think FIRST really needs to extend to every high school to achieve its goal of changing the culture of the US to focus less on sports heroes, etc. I think, patently, it needs to reach a significant enough fraction of America's youth in order to achieve this. A presence in every high school in America is not necessarily vital to this.

Re: How big will FIRST ever get?
 

I think FIRST SHOULDN'T be in every school IMHO, but why not aim for the moon? If you fail, you'll land among the stars.

I think more and more non-schools will get involved in the program, more and more teams that have money to use from the government or from individuals that could be spent on more video games or something like that, but instead on FIRST.

Re: How big will FIRST ever get?
 

...and, if you're lucky, try not to hit any of the planets on the way. :D

Re: How big will FIRST ever get?
 

FIRST's target goal this year was 1100 teams (growth of 18%), I hear this is not going to be reached but 1000 teams seems very possible (growth of ~8%). At this current rate of 8% growth it will take 9-10 more years to get to 2000 teams.

I keep hearing talk about FIRST in almost every high school - and honestly I don't see it happening anytime soon. When athletic programs started in high schools ~100+ years ago, not all schools had them, at least not like what they are today. I takes a lot of time for that culture to grow. I hope 50 years from know, Robot competitions will be commonplace in school, and when they are they will be funded locally like athletic programs, because parents will have a fit if they are not, after all, mom or dad were on a team when they were in high school and college and expect it from the schools.