#2 is better because it looks like it isn't a mistake that someone just didn't fix. Also it fits more of a look of Indiana instead of a jagged box.

I'm sorry that we are not designing our logos to your tastes. Let me know when you have something meaningful to say.

Well Also, it just doesn't look like Indiana to me.

Since you seem so interested in this, could you tell us how you think Indiana should look? If we learn how the state of Indiana looks in the eyes of others we can design a better logo that is more eye catching to people who are not from the state. If you wanted to give us some pictures or drawings that would be helpful.

Come on people ... let's be productive.

[edit]
Maybe someone can schedule an AIM meeting of some sorts to discuss the geography of Indiana, rather than replying to this thread 234 times tonight.
[/edit]

Well the way the detailed one outlined the states border mayed the square look deformed and not flat on top, that's why it doesn't strike me as Indiana.

It's not perfectly flat because part of the Great Lakes cut into the top of Indiana... Michigan, I think.

I was actuall refering to the southern part.

Yes, The Great Lakes do cut into Indiana and the southern border is actually the one side of the Ohio River. Check a map, The Indiana border isn't one straight line like many maps make it appear to be. Actually in the newest one, thats the closest I've ever seen the logo to looking like Indiana.


Keep up the good work.

I already knew that, I wasn't refering to the northern border along the lake, I was refering to the part along the rivers.

since nothing constructive is being posted here, i request that this thread be closed. if you want to further discuss it, reply in this thread http://www.indianafirst.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=126

I'm going to post all new ideas at the IndianaFIRST forums, feel free to discuss/suggest/vote here if you dont feel like registering. :D

'not flat on top' doesn't refer to the northern border?

Closing, as requested by David