![]() |
Re: 2x multiplier removal secnario
I'm not worried about this "scenerio" one bit. This whole thread is a big "what if". im not critizing the posters but the idea is a bit out there. I liked the idea of the rules being intrepeted by the intent of the rules.
Small balls get in a goal, they stay there. put a big ball on top of your goal get 2x small balls Hang off the top bar get points so some people try to think of ways to get around the rules (ie. skepticizing the rules like a lawyer). Dean himself said that he didn't want this. So now we have to find LEGAL ways to descore. theres plenty of ways to stop scoring this year. They are very obvious to me and within the rules. But if everyone wants to argue about how to get around the rules and still get penalized thats fine with me. Just don't approach my drive team starting with "first we're gonna jam that 2x ball hard in the oppenents goal" |
Re: 2x multiplier removal secnario
Quote:
This is getting ridiculous. I think FIRST should clarify the difference between grabbing a 2x and touching a 2x in order to push it out of a goal. They seem to be contradicting themselves, and that isn't a good thing. Let's see how many unfortunate teams go to their first regional with an illegal robot because things weren't spelled out black and white. |
Re: 2x multiplier removal secnario
Quote:
JVN |
Re: 2x multiplier removal secnario
Quote:
|
Re: 2x multiplier removal secnario
In my opinion, the 'ball is part of the robot' rule was intended to prevent teams from using the ball to block the other team from scoreing.
They responded to this, and the implications were not completly thought out. Wetzel |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:19. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi