![]() |
pic: Team 188 Closer Look
|
Re: pic: Team 188 Closer Look
This appears to just drive one side of the robot. If thats true, how can you possibly use even 1/2 of the power available to you here? Wouldnt your draw much more than 120 amps with the six biggest motors running simulataneously and then say... trying to push something immovable? Can your wheels utilize this much power?
|
Re: pic: Team 188 Closer Look
this has been done before, your motors dont have as much load on them when they are in a gearbox like that, coupled with other motors. The share the load. Also this might be a problem becuase of the extended use of motors this year but i doubt it. I hope it works out for these guys, and yes they will use that power to bully the 2-motor drives around :p
|
Re: pic: Team 188 Closer Look
True this has been done before. We did last year. No blown fuses, just broken chains. Using 35 chain this year with some improvements.
|
Re: pic: Team 188 Closer Look
well assuming two motor limited 2+ motor robots get into a pushing match. Their current draw can sky rocket to over 450 amps for a drill+chip or nearly 600 for this beast! Now what i was imagining is this robot locks its motors. I dont know the specific types of breakers used, but its possible to destroy stuff before something blows. if they dont have all the breakers working properly, they could probably melt even the 6 gauge wire itself pretty quickly.
I understand that locking the drivetrain is unlikely with so much power (unless of course a screw driver some how gets jammed in there ;) ) But regardless, three motors seems useless. Basically, i dont understand why anything more than a drill and an FP is needed because when running both at max power, the total current draw is already pushing 130 or so. Why design something that has a maximum power that you cant even utilize. Also, three motors must introduce a very large amount of ineffeciencies because of motor curves not matching. Because of the proliferation of 2 and 3 drive systems, I must have something very wrong in my analysis, or maybe i have discovered the key to the perfect drivetrain :D |
Re: pic: Team 188 Closer Look
Quote:
Though it would be interesting to see them go against someone with 3 motor drive. They both might reset their breakers ;). |
Re: pic: Team 188 Closer Look
Quote:
|
Re: pic: Team 188 Closer Look
I've seen a number of teams using multiple motors for their drive system this year. Personally, I don't see this game as being like last year and being 1 big shoving match. I think that even a simply drive system using a very simple motor will be fine. However, This drive train looks immense. Looks like the Fisher Price motor, Drill, and Atwood. This must be one of the fastest and most powerful robots i have seen so far this year.
|
Re: pic: Team 188 Closer Look
Quote:
|
Re: pic: Team 188 Closer Look
It worked well with us last year with Blizzard 4 although last year we broke a chain every few matches... But we might see some pushing matches like last year's...
The image of the gearbox is pretty much to scale about an inch give or take... |
Re: pic: Team 188 Closer Look
Quote:
|
Re: pic: Team 188 Closer Look
OMG....
u guys got it to work. Amazing. If it works like last years in the slightest way.....u will win big. Many teams have no idea how much speed and power these guys had last year. |
Re: pic: Team 188 Closer Look
Quote:
I guess i can't really argue about drivetrains until i get more experience. Its just that i dont understand why my analysis is incorrect. |
Re: pic: Team 188 Closer Look
i remember and look forward to meet them again this year, their robot was great only the yellow delphi and the little blue robot with cross bars had power to match theirs
|
Re: pic: Team 188 Closer Look
Quote:
However this year, reminds me of 2001? I'm not sure which one, but it was the year with the ramp and balancing the 2 goals. It seems like FIRST looked at the game this year, and realized they were going in the wrong direction. Looking at how the game is described and going to be played, it seems like pushing will be at very minimal. I am not saying pushing will not be a factor, because it will in very rare instances. This game is more about strategy and robot effectiveness, not so much brute strength. Adding the 2x ball and the maneuvers it take, is very reminiscent of past FIRST games, which it seems like they are going back to, which I'm glad to see. |
Re: pic: Team 188 Closer Look
Congratulations to Woburn for once again creating a fabulous gearbox. For those who aren't familiar with team 188, this will be their third consecutive year using a six motor drive system. The addition of the shifter makes them even more dangerous.
How has it been performing during the testing? Has the new chain held up well? I look forward to facing you guys in Pittsburgh and Toronto. Wow, it sure will be weird being on the other side. |
Re: pic: Team 188 Closer Look
We also do not believe that there will be tons of pushing. Speed and precision are what will be important. Shifting gears will allow both. If and when power is needed ...... If you think that pushing will not be important, what would you be doing if someone where trying to uncap your goal or cap theirs for the win?
|
Re: pic: Team 188 Closer Look
Quote:
Thanks everyone for the commentary. Let me just address a few things. First, you are all welcome to take a look at the regionals, I'd be happy to explain it, and get into an argument as to why it'll work :) . From experience, we have found that blowing breakers is very rare, and in fact we never did last year, despite having a non-shifting three-motor box. While there are hungrier F-Ps this year, we believe the ability to shift in conjunction with the backup battery keeping our controller on, will allow us to not overtax ourselves in matches. max is absolutely correct in saying that the three motors should not peak, because their current draw at that level is far higher than the motors will ever take. The gears are optomized and mated in such a way that something near the peak efficiency of each motor is used. The current is equally distributed. As a result, we will be able to get slightly more pushing power at the same amount of draw, divided over three motors; it won't be a full 'motor's worth' more, but it'll be enough to seriously mess with teams that thought they were powerful. According to the current curves, after about 10-15 seconds at stall in high gear, our robot will probably nuke itself, but we do not expect this to happen in normal match activities. It was also mentioned that versus a two-motor gearbox, we are not overtaxing our breakers, but the other robot will be. We will prevail. Bottom line, six-motor drive is a tried and true method for Woburn (although I have seen two other teams do it). Ask anyone at West Michigan or Toronto and they'll agree. Just try pushing us. As it happens, we don't believe a huge amount of pushing will occur this year. That doesn't mean in our minds that we shouldn't be able to do it. Maybe more on the gearbox later from the source, but we'd like to keep a little mystery :) . |
Re: pic: Team 188 Closer Look
Quote:
As to whether 3 motors per side with a shifting transmission is needed, that is a topic for another discussion. Awesome job of engineering regardless of whether or not you acually need all that power. Joe J. |
Re: pic: Team 188 Closer Look
Quote:
Let's all point and stare, and then pat Tristan on the back for an amazing job :D |
Re: pic: Team 188 Closer Look
Quote:
I don't think the chain might break, but there's always a small possibility in low gear... Like last year for example, our three motor gearbox with our 25 chain was really weak... If you've seen us last year, every few matches, there was at least one chain broken and 3 at one point I think. :ahh: Good luck to everyone with their bot with only 6 days left... |
Re: pic: Team 188 Closer Look
Team 639 will bring extra chains ;)
|
Re: pic: Team 188 Closer Look
25 mm chain saves a lot of weight, though i hope it doesnt break. We will have our pockets full with chains ;)
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:38. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi