Re: pittsburgh regioanl
 

Err, to clarify what Mr. Flex said, in that final QF match (4.2), 486 unfortunately sustained some damage to their hanging device in their autonomous mode. Before the 15 seconds were up, they informed me that they could not hang, which was a very major part of our plan. Panic ensued, but 188 and 486 almost recovered to win that match. It's all good. :)

Re: pittsburgh regioanl
 

Here are the alliance pairings for the Pittsburgh event.

1. 808, 48, 783
2. 84, 306, 128
3. 486, 1014, 188
4. 272, 1185, 772
5. 5, 1030, 398
6. 211, 1114, 578
7. 291, 247, 204
8. 1008, 63, 1168

Quarterfinals:
Alliance 1 over Alliance 8
Alliance 2 over Alliance 7
Alliance 6 over Alliance 3
Alliance 5 over Alliance 4

Semifinals:
Alliance 5 over Alliance 1
Alliance 6 over Alliance 2

Finals:
Teams 5, 1030, 398 over Teams 211, 1114, 578

Both matches in the finals were decided by mere inches. It's interesting to note that none of the top 4 alliances made the finals, not a common occurence at a FIRST event.

Congratulations to all teams.

Re: pittsburgh regioanl
 

Well, there's a second 2004 regional winner (team 5) that will be at Detroit next week! Congratulations to all of the finalists! Where did the Juggernauts (1) end up placing?

Re: pittsburgh regioanl
 

IIRC, they finished somewhere in the 20s.

They were 2-5 on Friday, but I don't have records for Saturday.

Re: pittsburgh regioanl
 

any videos or pics from pittsburgh??

Re: pittsburgh regioanl
 

Any videos would have to be by the teams as there were no video hookups allowed at this event.

Re: pittsburgh regioanl
 

Did you get any video?