![]() |
Chain Drive Question
I'm trying to find out if we have our chain tensioned so it doesnt hang down would that make the chain stronger and less likely to break?
|
Re: Chain Drive Question
Quote:
|
Re: Chain Drive Question
Quote:
|
Re: Chain Drive Question
Better tensioned chain will have less backlash when you are switching from driving forward to driving backwards. Wether its tensioned or untensioned you will get similar moments on the chain and run the same risk of snaping the chain in either case. Preventing the chain from hanging down is not something I'd suggest doing and as Tom said, it makes it easier for the chain to come off your sprockets. The precission you need in lining up sprockets also varries for different chain sizes as does the chains strength.
|
Re: Chain Drive Question
Just some friendly advice (for next time) go find the formula that will tell you the center to center distance of the sprockets so that the chain fits and no tensioner is needed
|
Re: Chain Drive Question
You might also want to make sure your sprockets are in line with eachother, so your chain isnt being bent. this will cause the chain to strecth further. Keep in mind that chains are one of the times where my "measure once, cut twice and claim the mistake was a lightening hole" philosophy doesnt work.
|
Re: Chain Drive Question
One more note. If you do tension the chain, make sure to tension is properly. If the tensioner is spring loaded, you're fine. if it's not, make sure you don't tighten it too much. The chain should really have a small amount of slack in it at rest anyways. if you over tighten/tension the chain, it will start binding and wearing the rollers and sprockets too quickly.
|
Re: Chain Drive Question
Team 258 made the mistake Kevin just described this weekend, and after tensioning it quite a bit, they sheared their drive shaft in half.
The only thing I like about the 80/20 we use is the ability to slide our wheels to compensate for chain slackness. Cory |
Re: Chain Drive Question
last year we used 80/20, it was pretty nice, made it easy to tension the chains, and attach things like motor mounts and the such, We didn't use it this year, instead we went with 1x3 Al box channel, Hopefully next year the team will use 80/20, It looks good, and works well. What more could you ask for (except maybe for a cheaper price tag).
|
Re: Chain Drive Question
Quote:
|
Re: Chain Drive Question
Quote:
Just to be different, the advantage of tensioners is that they make the streching of the chain much less of a problem. :) |
Re: Chain Drive Question
we have always used chain and never used a chain tensioner. This year we did not have one drive train problem... usually we have a chain fall off or something once. This year we used 1inch shafts (we kept bending the 1/2 inch shafts) we also used spacer on the shaft so that they can not walk off. below are some pictures.
This is an ok picture of our left side the drills and you can see the spacers. http://www.valleytech.k12.ma.us/robo...lectronics.JPG Just another alright shot of the drive system. http://www.valleytech.k12.ma.us/robo...004_211Bot.JPG Cant find any others but feel free to take a look. http://www.valleytech.k12.ma.us/robo...photos2004.htm or http://www.valleytech.k12.ma.us/robo...CFRegional.htm |
Re: Chain Drive Question
ALWAYS TENSION CHAINS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The reason is that you will have better efficency, better durability, better drive train response and an overall better drive system. I'm partial to tensioning mechanisms beacuse chains will loosen over time. An adjustible tensioner WILL save you time. Adjusting a tensioner is far faster then changing the length of a chain. There are several guidelines when using chain. 1. Lubricate!! chain will always need lubrication especialy chain sizes of #35 and smaller since they don't have rollers in them. IE built in bearings because of their size. 2. Proper alignment! is crucial for long lasting and efficent chain implementation. Any misalignment is bad engineering practice. 3. Tension chains! loose chains snap and whip under varying loads which is exactly how they are run in FIRST. Plus they last longer when properly tensioned. Properly being the keyword. The addition of an adjutible tensioner is the ideal tensioning solution in the perspective of tensioning not necisarily from the perspective of weight. 4. Design chain for short spans long spans are hard to tension properly and will put unecssary strain on chains. 5. Proper axial support. NEVER, NEVER, NEVER EVER cantilever any axle if you can posibly help it always double bearing whenever possible place a bearing on each side of any force applied. In other cases beef up axle size, and place additional bear on the other side of the already existing bearing, and shorten axle length to reduce shear force. FOLLOW GOOD ENGINEERING PRACTICES and every component will realize it's full potential and perform to the best of it's ability giving you the best robot possible. |
Re: Chain Drive Question
We have been using chain drives for about 7 years and until this year have not ever used a tensioner. For drive shafts, we would just have someone pull as hard as possible on the wheel while tensioning it. This has never caused any problems for our drive shafts, chains or wheels, but we have a colorful history of chains coming off because they were loose.
This year we used a tensioner, not spring loaded, just a plastic adjustible runner, on our drive system, on the chain that allows it to swerve. The reason was not to protect the chain or make it easily tensioned. The real reason was that it was impossible, with our tiny sprockets, to get the wheels all aligned without tensioners. |
Re: Chain Drive Question
Quote:
You need to make sure people know that instead of an actual tensioning device, we had slotted wheel mounts. To make the chains "taught" we loosened the wheel mounting bolts, slid the wheel back until the chain was taught, and tightened the wheel mounting bolts. Before we made that nifty modification, in 98 and 99 we used teflon blocks that were slid under the runs of chain and held in by screws/velcro. Both ways seemed to work just fine. [speaking as a current mentor] The past 2 years on 968 we used slotted wheel mounts... which worked fine (simply because we used a bosch type frame) which enabled us to easily slide the wheel mounts on the slotted chassis material with t-nuts. This year, we chose to weld the frame (to reduce weight) and decided to come up with a tensioning device. Strangely, we came up with something similar to 115, and used HDPE rollers of various sizes. When the chain initially stretches, we simply install a larger diameter roller and the chain is tight again. (this way isnt as elegant is I would have liked, but it was about as simple and as lightweight as we could think of at the time) Note: All of these examples are #25 chain. #35 chain is much more forgiving and sometimes does not require tensioning. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:15. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi