sleepers for nats
 

OK here is my list of sleepers for nats.

222
103
25
56 i know they won but i feel people are over looking them there a solid bot
121

Re: sleepers fro nats
 

Please define what you mean by sleepers

Re: sleepers for nats
 

teams i think that are going to break out at nationals but do ok at reagionals

Re: sleepers fro nats
 

i like the idea of sleepers for nats.. there are always some at regionals, but they definitely have the chance to shine with no one or two "super alliances" breaking out and dominating as so often happens.

i would bust out and choose some teams but i really havent been able to watch any regionals in detail. too much stuff in my mind to keep track of.

Re: sleepers fro nats
 

I wish i could put more teams up there but i only saw 2 events

Re: sleepers for nats
 

there's lots of good bots out there that just needed a regional (or two) to practice/troubleshoot. to name a few...

494 <-awesome team, awesome drivetrain, awesome robot
343
34
1024
1002
1057
281 <-solid robot, gave me a scare at peachtree
25
188 <-mean looking gearbox, haven't seen the robot, but nice gearbox
710
233
312
234
[edit]
461
108
more to come, pro'lly...
[/edit]

Re: sleepers for nats
 

461.

Re: sleepers for nats
 

I wouldn't list 233 as a sleeper, they came in 2nd at FL, and won NYC.

My sleeper picks:

710
312
108 (so I'm a little biased)
461
21

...that's all I can think of right now.

Re: sleepers for nats
 

Thanks, but would we be a sleeper finishing in 2nd place twice?

177. They won one already but they had to tweak after thier first regional. It was like the first regional all over again for them. They took off the big arm. They know what game they play now, and who to be with. Look out.

484 Mad potential, just have to fix the top assembly falling to the floor.

1391. Personally I just love the MOOSE. Great rookies. Didin't win anything yet, but I have faith.

Re: sleepers for nats
 

i only said that because i have not heard about you like other teams so i felt you were getting over looked

Re: sleepers for nats
 

Ah, yes, Thanks :D

I also believe that any team in the finals or any 200 + scores will be big. I dont know names and therefor they are sleepers. Just my recent thoughts.

Re: sleepers for nats
 

I don't know if they would be considered a sleeper, but 980 has a great robot.

Re: sleepers for nats
 

Thank you very kindly. 108 promises not to disappoint our followers ;).

Re: sleepers for nats
 

there was a similar thread dealing with underrated teams. And yes, I too think 1391 can do some damage at nats.

Re: sleepers for nats
 

It's going to be the teams that no one expects to win that are truly the sleepers. You can't predict who they are really going to be, but it's amusing to do nevertheless.