![]() |
Galileo SCAM Ranking
I’d previously published a list of all team qualifying average scores greater than 90. There were 50 teams on that list. But since there was a large variation in Regional Event averages (eg. 41 @ Pittsburgh; 73 @ West Michigan), comparing robots solely on the basis of average score is misleading…..So, I tried to neutralize the effect of Regional differences with an equation I called “Scoring Capability Analysis Model”. The acronym SCAM was purposely chosen so that no one would take this too seriously.
The SCAM number was calculated using the ratio of Team Average (TA) to Regional Average (RA) and makes an adjustment for performance consistency using the Team’s Standard Deviation (SD). The equation identifies teams that had high scoring averages relative to the other robots they competed against, and who also demonstrated consistently high scores – without a large variation from match to match. If you find yourself paired with one of these robots, expect a high score. If you’re competing against them, you might want to consider defense. SCAM = (TA-SD)/RA The Galileo Division Top 10 SCAM Robots are: 1. 5 2. 1305 3. 222 4. 569 5. 141 6. 980 7. 93 8. 1405 9. 971 10. 518 Honorable Mention goes to Teams 27, 1218, 236, 284, 173, and 157 (who all had scoring averages over 90, but didn’t make the top 10 SCAM list). |
Re: Galileo SCAM Ranking
I'm curious where 177 is on this ranking list. I'm assuming our performance at UTC dragged us down since we were working out the bugs all weekend.
|
Re: Galileo SCAM Ranking
Quote:
BTW you are ranked 10th on the master metric list. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 19:13. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi