Re: Winner
 

Yes, but I'm trying to come up with how to decide the best picked alliance.

So, Im ranking them by winning percentage, and then by highest average score per match. Teams with the exact winning percentage and average score are being given the same rank.

These ranks are then appointed to their respective persons, and added together. Lowest score determines the winning picker.

Sound good?

Re: Winner
 

I'll go with that.

Re: Winner
 

Team 995 and 21, where are you?

I have no data on either...and yet they are in alliances.

Anyone know what happened?

Re: Winner
 

hey koko... it was very nice to meet you... you are awesome...

wondering if a list will be posted with everybodys percentage for the Fantasy FIRST...?

Re: Winner
 

i talked to mike walker... and he told me that they had their own pits and everything... but they were not suppose to compete... so their robot wasnt there... COMBAT didnt compete at nationals...

Re: Winner
 

So...what to do? They have to have a rank. I can flip a coin and one can get 293rd and the other 294th, or both can have rank 293.

Re: Winner
 

Maybe whoever did better at regionals?

Re: Winner
 

since i picked 21, and i realize how very little effect 293rd vs 294th place will make, i hereby volunteer to give 21 last place. hope that makes your life easier

Re: Winner
 

Solace, you rule so much :)

I'll put it in as that, and then if Ed wants it differently I can change it.

Re: Winner
 

348 is also a no-show in my data.

It may just be easier to give you all 293'rd place at this point.

Re: Winner
 

Tie the no-shows for last. It's only fair.

Re: Winner
 

Wait, I thought the finals counted? Am I wrong?