Re: One-Regional versus Multi-Regional teams
 

Oh yeah. I forgot to say. Do what we do. We send the drive team and whoever else is interested to a scout a competition. This year we went to St. Louis to watch for the second year. We also take a video camera and go into the pits and interview teams. We got some good interviews from 1024 and 16 and several other teams. We get footage of how the game is played and then we have a meeting the next week where the rest of the team gets to watch what went on.

This has worked well the last two years:

We've seeded 1st(2003) and 11th(2004) at LSR
And 5th(2003 Archimedes) and 13th(2004 Galileo) by doing this.
We have also won all the awards I show below. Maybe competing in two regionals would help more but for those on a budget sending a small team to watch and film can do wonders.

Re: One-Regional versus Multi-Regional teams
 

All teams have finite resources. There is only so much money, time, blood, sweat, et cetera, that a team can put into this competition. For some teams, including team 118, that threshold is, comparitively, pretty high.

What Lucien is pointing out is that, by allowing teams that attend several regionals to be more competitive, both in being more likely to qualify for nationals, and by having a better prepared robot and team when they get there, they are forcing other teams to make a choice.

The choice is to either use those finite resources to further the mission of FIRST, or use those finite resources to further the success of your team.

Now, please understand that we realize the success of a team is not measured in awards and trophies, but by the inspiration of the students. Nonetheless, the choice being presented to us here is between having a successful team and being recognized as a successful team, and there is something wrong with a system that forces that choice upon us.

Re: One-Regional versus Multi-Regional teams
 

There was only 1 team under 500 and attended only one regional that made it into the top 8 of the four divisions (3%). Hmmmm, I would have also expected what Matt had noted but it tends not to be the case. Thanks Matt, that made me feel MUCH better about our team's (118 only attends one regional) chances to ever crack the top eight at the Championships :) Also, thanks for picking 500 instead of 400 because then our odds go to 0%! 456 (Vicksburg, MS) was the only team under 500 that made it into the top 8 of a division while only attending one regional ... they were 8th in Newton. The only reason that I point out team 456's success is because I'm proud to have been associated with their beginnings.

Matt, thanks for the pick-me-up :D
Lucien

P.S. I am a steadfast preacher that it is not all about the 'bot but our 'bot may be the only way we will get to the championships next year so we can expose our students to the atmosphere that has 15,000 students excited and cheering about engineering.

Re: One-Regional versus Multi-Regional teams
 

This is very true. After our team went to the MWR, we did well, but also learned a lot that we could do better, but that was the end for us, because we dont have the resources for another. If we had another regional, I believe we could have done tons better. This is where the heavilly funded teams who attend multiple regionals have the edge.

Re: One-Regional versus Multi-Regional teams
 

Thanks for your input. Since there are mostly comments, let me wrap-up the pros & cons of having a Warm-up Event.

Pros
-Communities will have FIRST events that currently do not have FIRST events. This would help to expose FIRST.
-Helps equalize the amount of robot-time between one-regional and multi-regional teams.
-Allows teams to help other teams in a low-pressure atmosphere.
-Allows rookies to get a feel for the flow of a tournament before attending their, often only, regional.
-MAY make for a more satisfying season for rookie teams thereby helping the retention rate.
-Teams have a scrimmage before their only regional.
-Improves the chances for one-regional teams to qualify for the Championships.
-One-regional robots work better at their event.
-Teams get to compete more during the season.
-FIRST gets to train refs in a low-pressure environment.
-FIRST gets to see the game being played before the first regional.
-Teams get to see different strategies before the first event.
-Minimizes the pickup points for FedEx.
-Teams learn how to put together a small local event.
-School gyms across the country would have robotics events on the same day.

Cons
-Teams have to host an event.
-Possibly takes money away from FIRST because teams don't feel the need to attend two regionals.
-Takes time away from family.
-Multi-regional teams now have more competition.
-Multi-regional teams have to compete cold with teams that have been to a Warm-up event.
-Puts teams that are one-regional teams and cannot attend a Warm-up at more of a disadvantage than they are now. Maybe a hardship waiver to just keep the bot until Saturday afternoon might help to solve this.



After reviewing the pros and cons, I don't see an issue with proposing this to FIRST. As I study it, I like the idea more and more. A special thanks to everyone that helped develop it.

Re: One-Regional versus Multi-Regional teams
 

Team 340 won the Newton division with only one regional under our belt.

Re: One-Regional versus Multi-Regional teams
 

I definitely think that going to two regionals is an advantage. Take our situation: If we had gone to only UTC, we would not have gone to nationals. UTC essentially served as our practice competition, at which we learned that the arm was a bad idea. Then, we went to Philly and won, and thus qualified for nationals. So, going to multiple regionals gives your team more time to work out any kinks in the robot, as well as more chances of qualifying for nationals. Furthermore, If you do make nats in one regional, a second one helps you hone your skills further

Re: One-Regional versus Multi-Regional teams
 

The problem there is that most teams would never have that kind of money.

The one thing I was thinking though is what if FIRST combined the entry fee for your first regional, and the kit. If they made it less expensive for your first regional, and regionals after that were of a higher cost, it would make it a lot easier on the teams who don't have lots of money.

Re: One-Regional versus Multi-Regional teams
 

Add this to the Pros:

-Any team having the financial resources to attend multiple regionals that chooses instead to attend just the Warm-Up Event and a single regional will have a greater share of those resources available to invest in expanding FIRST in their area.

Re: One-Regional versus Multi-Regional teams
 

Well, even though our team only goes to one regional (lonestar) I think we did well in our division. I did not go to nationals expecting to win only to make sure we werent the worst( no offense). I was glad to win the lonestar regional because it is my senior year and all :) . We won the regional my sophomore year but I had less respect and appretiation for it then, now I can fully comprehend the magnitude of it all.

By the way did anyone watch the lonestar regional? I hardly hear any talk of it. It was a very exciting regional.It seemed more like battlebots because of us(a very bad misrepresentation of what we stand for). I felt very bad though because it seemed like we played dirty, we were one of the few robots that went for defensive. I could not show my face around 118 without feeling bad for them, we kinda sorta bent their arm while they were going to hang in our last qualifing round. No penalty, only emotional baggage.

Anyways, back to the topic. I feel that going to more than one regional will ruin the rush and feel of the game.

Re: One-Regional versus Multi-Regional teams
 

I'm sorry. I thought that your team had seeded 35th in the Newton Division but I did know 340 had only attended one regional. It was just a quick analysis ... my fault. It is awesome how the same 3 teams that were allied at the Buckeye Regional were again allied in the Newton Division. That is great cooperation. 340's cooperation is as compelling as the cooperation mentioned in the Chairman's Award summary. Great job!