Re: Low quality 2X ball?
 

Yeah I knoe 33 is a good number to have, I wish we could have been paired up with you in a match where we didn't fall over in the first 30 seconds! You guys had a great machine and I liked how it complemented our design well. I was very honored to learn that our 2002 machine served as an inspiration for your design!

I would also like to point out that team 33 could have been the Archimedes #1 seed if we hadn't fallen over in our qualifying round with them and been out for most of the match. Great job and a great machine guys!

Also back on topic for this thread...

It is true that teams should have learned to deal with the game dynamic of fragile balls, But I personally feel that the frequency of popped balls took away from some matches, and took away from the intended strategy of some machines.

I guess I am over my limit of 33 posts...darn.

Rob

Re: Low quality 2X ball?
 

I noticed it too. they did seem much more fragile