![]() |
pic: 7 lbs overweight
|
Re: pic: 7 lbs overweight
um... it was exactly 7.3 LBS i was there when it got weighed. It was funny i only said it to everybody i knew like 100 times.
|
Re: pic: 7 lbs overweight
How did you end up cutting the weight.....looking at the robot....it seems like you had quite a task for yourself.
|
Re: pic: 7 lbs overweight
Good thing for Tj this year we did not have a weight problem... We were about 3 under... How did you manage to cut weight like that??? There is not much room to cut from the looks...
|
Re: pic: 7 lbs overweight
Quote:
|
Re: pic: 7 lbs overweight
man, this brings back good memories.. in chesapeake we were 15 pounds over at 6:30- and the pits closed at 8:00. yeah, we made weight and didn't lose any of our functions... although we lost so much robustness and quality. next year the first thing we're buying is a reliable scale... ha
|
Re: pic: 7 lbs overweight
We use speed holes... In 2002 we lost like 3 pounds with many 1 inche speed holes... We had a lot of them and the robot was still unbelievable...
|
Re: pic: 7 lbs overweight
We were 80lbs overweight back in 2002. We lost a whole drive system and were still over weight! Speed holes ahoy!
|
Re: pic: 7 lbs overweight
Yeah, 7 lbs over is defiently not good at 5:30pm on thursday.
We switched part of the arm out with the spare one that we milled down quite a bit. Then we finally said screw it and took the atwoods off our 2 motor drive assembly. They were later re-added as we dropped the van door motor and a few other extra parts. 2 atwoods and gears = about 6lbs. It was close at UCF. |
Re: pic: 7 lbs overweight
Back in 2002 (when I was a rookie freshman), one advisor designed a super awesome drive system for our robot. The unfortunate thing was that it was crab, and each system took about 20 lbs. Two systems of one chippewa motor each, and two systems with both a drill and FP motor each (only the drill ended up being used :D ) Anyways, it is the last day and a half of build season, and we were 20-30 lbs overweight. That year we went to three regionals. The first one, The Buckeye Regional (which I didn't attend), I heard that during half the matches our robot couldn't even move, because for weight we switched out critical components :yikes: . We still won an imagery award. The Midwest Regional, our next one, the robot had one arm and could manipulate one goal instead of 2. It was still fast enough to take one goal out of Hammond's way, and for that reason, we won one match. We were the 24th pick by the 8th seeded rookie because of our cheering! In St. Louis, we switched out 2 of the front systems (chipps) and put in machine-shop-made casters instead. We had enough weight to make "Boiler Tape" to make our robot in our own end zone.
The moral of this VERY LONG story is that it is okay to take stuff off and have a somewhat messed up robot, because you still succeed, you learn from your mistakes, and, because in the long run, we're all winners (sorry for that Cheezy, Mr. Rogers quote at the end) |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:41. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi