![]() |
Hypothetical Situation
Eric's Poll Question #4
Hypothetical situation: You are at a competition, you aren't doing very well. You lost a few close matches and you are in 50th place. In your last match you are playing against your sister team. The team who has helped you since the beginning, if you ever need help they are there for you. They are currently in 7th place. If they win they will move into 1st and be able to select the team that they want, giving them a really good chance of winning. You have a good chance of beating them because their alliance partner is weak. Do you go easy and let them win? Please give it some thought and answer honestly. Edit: For the simple fact that no one is even considering it, we are now assuming that the team they want to pick is your team. |
Re: Hypothetical Situation
No, I would definitely not go easy on them.
This is not fair to your alliance or the other team. Each team has to play to their full abilities. End of story. Similar situations have been discussed many times before in other threads. |
Re: Hypothetical Situation
No way!
|
Re: Hypothetical Situation
No I would not go easy on them. In fact, we played on of the teams we mentored last year, 1120, in the finals at Sacramento this year. That was not quite your hypothetical situtation, but I would still play to the best of my ability, no matter my friend's position. I would try to show off, hoping to be picked myself.
This does not mean that I do not want my sister team to win. It simply means that I want them to win fairly. |
Re: Hypothetical Situation
Quote:
You play your hardest, anything less would be disrespectful. I know if I was on the seeded alliance, I'd want everyone to try their hardest to kick my butt. I'd expect it, because if I was in that position it's what I'd be trying to do. This isn't a Nash Equilibrium problem. Go out there, kick some butt, and be the best you can be. As a coach, how could I ask my HS drivers to hold back? How could I tell them "we can win this, but we're not going to". Or worse... how could I mislead them by giving them a losing strategy? Not to mention my alliance partner... I hope this is as much a no brainer for everyone else as it is for me. John |
Re: Hypothetical Situation
I think going easy on them would show disrespect.
However, this does not mean you can go around beating on them the whole time. Just play your game, and play it fairly. Whoever wins will come out on top. I like to think about it in the terms of 60 vs. 254 last season. Had we gone up against the Poofs, we would not have ever gone easy on them. |
Re: Hypothetical Situation
I'd give 'em a challenge, prove that they are worthy of the #1 spot!
|
Re: Hypothetical Situation
Play your hardest. This isn't about who's in first, or who could be. Even if you are in 50th, if you prove yourself to another team, and they think you will compliment thier robot, then you show them what you are worth.
18 teams in the finals, guaranteed they are not 1-18 seeds. |
Re: Hypothetical Situation
Would it change if the team that they wanted to pick was you? We are assuming you wanted them to pick you.
|
Re: Hypothetical Situation
With the addition of the fact that they'll pick you, it's harder, but I'm going to say that you should play your hardest no matter what. :)
|
Re: Hypothetical Situation
I would definitly still play my hardest. They are in first place because they earned it, not cuz teams 'took it easy' on them, so giving them competition is good, for both of you. Everyone wants a good showing in their last match, and a strong competitive match is definitly a good showing.
With FIRST I have noticed that the teams all carry a mutual respect for the other teams and no one gets upset about teams who 'put up a good fight' they just gain more respect because you tried your best. [edit] when voting i accidently clicked the wrong one... its early |
Re: Hypothetical Situation
Absolutely play your hardest.
That is the only fair approach to your partner and the other teams. If you play easy, the word will quickly spread. Soon, the team you were being nice to "only won because you let them". You both lose respect within FIRST, and reputations die a long, slow death. The beauty of FIRST is that you: COMPETE like crazy for the 2 minutes you are on the field - no friends, no allies, no debts - except to your partner at the moment, then COOPERATE like crazy all the rest of the time, even to the point of helping the very teams that may whip you later in the day. When we play this way, we all win. |
Re: Hypothetical Situation
I'd say go out and kick their collective boo-tays...in a non-damaging, graciously professional manner, of course. (wink wink)
If nothing else, it'll send the message that you fight hard in a match--all the better reason for them to pick you! |
Re: Hypothetical Situation
At the risk of angering people I would have to say that I might let them win. To me, if they were going to pick you, it is all part of strategy. Doing this is not illegal.
|
Re: Hypothetical Situation
I believe I would not take it easy... Its not fair to your alliance partner and besides its all in fun... If you throw in the towel on the match and go easy then people would probably hold grouges or something and it would drain out the fun... *shrugs* who knows...
|
Re: Hypothetical Situation
No matter the situation, you should never give up. We had a bad luck situation at nats. Against the #1 tewice. We could have given upl, giving 93 the #1 spot (they were undefeated) they were cosidering us as a 2nd round pick. We aren't really close as teams, btu we still played our best, knocking them to #5
|
Re: Hypothetical Situation
Do not go easy on them. This is the same thing as throwing a match. Remember last year when there was alot of talk about "setting up matches" (sorry cant remeber the exact name we used last year) were the teams agreeed to leave each other's stacks alone and then just fight for the top. If you did this in any other sport you would be banned from that sport for life, it has happen in baseball many of times. IF they want to be in 1st place then they will win, but give them a run for their money
|
Re: Hypothetical Situation
This happened to us in Detroit. Now we weren't in 50th, we were in 12th or so, and Chief Delphi (47) was in the top 5 I think. We really wanted to pair up with them, they had a bot that perfectly complimented ours. We played them in qualifying. A friend of mine from the Juggernauts (1) came up to me and said "hey, are you gonna let them win?" I think others probably thought that was the case too. Well, we went out, played them, and beat them. We never play to lose, or even go easy. We play our best every match.
|
Re: Hypothetical Situation
Absolutely and unequivocally, NO!
Here is a real world problem though (along the lines)...A team on Saturday morning has lost it's drive team. They are somewhere on the road but no one knows where. Team### asks for teams to put up a drive team until their drivers arrive. You are lucky enough to have a backup drive crew to drive for them only to find out that in their second match, they are against you. What do you do? What do you do? |
Re: Hypothetical Situation
HECK NO! FIRST is still a competiton. Anything less than that is disrespectful for those who tired their hardest and won, and it's also disrespectful for the sister team (not only to mention opening the avenu of "Well, they just lost since they get helped by that team...")
We had a similar occurence during last year's Champs. We didn't do as well as VCU or Annapolis, and we moved are way up to 8th place by winning our last match by just a little. We picked our alliance partners and then lost in the quarter finals. Neddless to say, we found that another team we were very good friends with were going to pick us, and they ended up doing very well. Should we have thrown our last match to get them to pick us? No. It's disrespectful for our alliance parter, our opponents, and all the teams who won fair and square. |
Re: Hypothetical Situation
Quote:
|
Re: Hypothetical Situation
Quote:
answer to question #2: hope that they get there before you have to play your second match (the one against them) and if they don't...hope that you designed your robot better than they did and hope that your "backup" operating crew shows why they are "backup" (and the hp missing some shots would help you out too) :) |
Re: Hypothetical Situation
I don't mean to start another heated argument, but I'd like to just mention that this might be equated to collaboration between teams (on a large scale, think 254-60 scale). Sacrifices are made all the time in FIRST for the greater goal.
|
Re: Hypothetical Situation
I hate reiterate what other people are saying, but if the team wants #1 bad enough then they will win. An example of this would be this past year at the Palmetto Regional. We (11) finished 5th overall and was picked by team 281 to ally with them. We accepted. Later on in the allaince selections the team that we mentored (1302) was picked by the number 8 seed. Next thing you know we are playing each other in the finals! They won the first match and we had to win the second. Things got screwy because one of their partners was broken so they decided to put in team 95, but they had already declared that it would be team 1302 and their other partner (i forget the #), but if we wanted to play by the rulebook verbatim then since the robots had already been introduced the match was considered started. We were left with 2 options. Play the game with 1302 and 95 and hope we won to force a third match, or force them to put in their disabled robot and basically guarantee ourselves the win. In the spirit of GP we chose the first option. We won the second match and by time that match was over their third partner was working. We then went onto the 3rd match and wound up winning. We could've gone easy on them and let them win, granted this is a little more extreme than the number one seed, but its the same principle. PLAY TO WIN!!!
|
Re: Hypothetical Situation
No, only in one situation would that be acceptable.
In Atlanta (Newton) we were moving up into the 20s after a rough start and our ally 585 from AZ this year had been in the top 8 the entire competition. Our last match was against them and if we won we would finish in the mid 20s and they would definitely be bumped out of the top 8. A few people suggested we could make an agreement with them but that idea was shot down almost immediately. We wanted to prove ourselves and play our best, and also we thought that throwing a match would be very underhanded. The only reason why the idea came up is because we were desperate to recover from out tie and loss in our first two rounds because our on-the-spot rebuilt arm didn't quite reach the bar all the way. We didn't like the idea one bit. We ended up finishing 23rd in Newton and 585 22nd. Personally, I like that we finished together. It's too bad neither of us got to finals, but getting to Atlanta was plenty of fun in itself. The only time I'd say you should throw a game is when you and your ally both have broken bots, are out of the competition, you both like the other two teams a lot, and want them to go to finals. Then you don't shoot, let their shooters score a ball, and let their drivers practice some fancy moves for elims. |
Re: Hypothetical Situation
If the teams were that close to eachother, then it would definately be a sticky situation. But, FIRST is the only sort of competition that I've seen where somebody can win and the opponents can be genuinely happy for them.
As strategist, I would plan to play the game and play it well. I'd tell my team to do their best. I'd play the strengths of my own robot and team to the weaknesses of the other. I'd hope for the best, but I don't think I could be disappointed either way. I wouldn't be disappointed because, in the long run, it wouldn't matter who wins. We would still care about eachother as teams, no matter what. The teams would always hope for the other to continue on in the finals. It would pride in the work of a friend. Both situations, no matter which was chosen, would be best because the teams are able to share in the excitement of it all. |
Re: Hypothetical Situation
Quote:
Er... I am completely confused. I have no idea what this has to do with 60 & 254 working together... In fact, this thread is not really about collaboration. It's more of a collusion thread in disguise. Of course, not that that's a bad thing. It's perfectly acceptable to talk about. And I still think I'd never go easy on them. |
Re: Hypothetical Situation
i would go easy if i knew i would get picked. Getting to the next sstage is the most important thing. Sorry, everyone but i am feeling quite ambitious :eek: :eek: :eek:
|
Re: Hypothetical Situation
I would not go easy on them becuase if they were able to goet in &th place they must be preety good even though their alliance is not. For example, most of our matches were played with teams that were not very good and we still scored 100+ points. Every team should play to the best of their abilities.
|
Re: Hypothetical Situation
In going easy you are not being fair to your own team or the other team. I feel that if you give the match to them then your own team has let itself down and you have been unfair to the rest of the teams in the competition. I dont think you should harm their robot, but once you go on the field for competition you can't let your alliance down. What if that match was the one that decided whether your alliance partner would have gotten picked for the finals matches? You never know what implications giving up will have on your alliance partner. I dont think that it looks good on your team or the team you are helping to win if you just give up. Thats just my opinion.
-Aaron |
Re: Hypothetical Situation
Quote:
|
Re: Hypothetical Situation
When our drive team goes out on the field we go out their to win...no matter who our alliance partner is and who is agianst us. Last year at Annapolis we went against(they were together) the two teams we won the regional with and beat them. In my mind picking a team that can beat you would be to your advantage...then you dont have to worry about them in the elims.;)
-Pat |
Re: Hypothetical Situation
Fair game all the way. And if you lose, then you know that you tried.
|
Re: Hypothetical Situation
I am almost ashamed that this question was posted.
That goes against so many things that FIRST stands for. For example, if this were ANY professional sport, "holding back" like that would be classified as one thing, and one thing only: POINT SHAVING, which just so happens to be illegal. One of the reasons i like FIRST so much is because of the Gracious Professionalism. This would seem to go directly against that. How could that possibly be gracious to your alliance partners? Also, FIRST is about showing what YOU can do, not about holding back. So my answer is ABSOLUTELY NOT! I also want to say that if anyone asked me to hold back so they could win, even if they would then pick me, I would be disappointed. From the other side as well, I would also NEVER ask any team I am competing against to hold back in a match. And this just follows in my belief that to be the best, you have to beat the best. |
Re: Hypothetical Situation
The old saying "cheaters never win" means that if you cheat you did not beat your opponent, so you did not actually win
if you throw a match for a sister team, then they have not 'won' the match, it was handed to them and if they end up in 1st place, they did not earn that position, it was handed to them and if they win the regional...... you would really have to hold a lot of contempt for your sister team to think they cannot win on their own, to win honestly how would you feel, if your team won a regional, and later found out that other teams had rigged the event to put you on top? If someone did that to my team I would be heartbroken. If you Win (capitol W) then that trophy means something. If someone cheats on your behalf then its nothing but 85 cents worth the plastic. |
Re: Hypothetical Situation
Although you may be helping your sister team, you are most certainly not doing your alliance partners any justice. Sometimes not playing as hard as you can is a good thing, but in this case it most certainly is not.
|
Re: Hypothetical Situation
Going easy is not an option! In fact I think it would be an insult to you sister team to not try to win. Competition at a regional is exactly what it sounds like, competition. On the field everyon has the same goal, to win. Even if it seems hopeless, you should at least go down fighting!
|
Re: Hypothetical Situation
God this thread is old, but here goes.
<devil's advocate> Are you trying to win a single match, or win a tournament? Winning competitions is in large part about cultivating relations with teams, subtle inter-team politics, and though I've never seen it myself, I'd guess a fair amount of backstabbing. It's part of the game as much as scoring tetras or poof balls is. So yeah, I'd say always try your hardest to win. Win the compeition! How is it at all un-GP to try to promote your allies by choosing which matches to do really well in? It is a nash equilibrium (well, it's game theoretic anyway) Mr. Neun! If you aren't thinking like this, you aren't trying as hard as you can. That's rather un-GP if you ask me. </devil's advocate> *twirls mustache, cackles* |
Re: Hypothetical Situation
I think you should not go easy on them, you played strong ever other match and lost by a close match, so why not play hard again and give your sister team a run for their money? Seriously, speaking from experience you get more fun out of earning something than it being handed to you. =]
|
Re: Hypothetical Situation
Collusion! Nash Equilibrium! MAN, I'm glad I had micro-economics this semester!
Well I'm going to have to hope over with phrontist on this one for the simple chance of an intelligent argument (because its no fun when nobody's arguing :D So the higher ranked sister team has been doing great all day, is 1st seed, and comes into one of the last matches of the day with you. Their alliance is them, and two robots that have had some "problems" :( we all know how that goes) and your alliance consists of you and two other average to strong robots. They can almost, I mean ALMOST, beat all three of you by themselves, but it comes down to this: dum dum ... dum dum (does that sound like a heart beat to you :confused: if you go up onto the ramp, your alliance wins, if you go play "defense" ;) they win (and you know they are going to pick you as their first pick, and their is a very strong chance you will win your division at nationals and have the best shot to win nationals) so what do you do? huh? ps. sorry i had to make this so hypothetical and far-fetched, but this is the only way i could stretch this to make you, the average FIRSTer, even consider it :yikes: ... let the intelligent punditry resume! |
Re: Hypothetical Situation
Are you kidding?
there may be wthical values involved in this, but you just gotta win man. you have to. you need to strive for perfection and wipe down the weak! and at the same time, you have to help the weak while you are offstage. |
Re: Hypothetical Situation
if your sister team is 8th and you are 50th, you let them win a match, ok
they goto #1 ranking and you fall to what? 65th? if the #1 ranked team picks the #65th ranked team in their first draft pick, there is no way you are going home with the trophy, because the #2 team will pick the #3 or #4 team, and by the time your sister teams gets another pick, their choices (with the new rules this year) will be down to the #17th ranked team. Poetic justice: if you are not playing to win and hand a match to your sister team and they pick the #65th ranked team (you) then they are not playing to win either. In the end you both loose, and the judges will pick up on this and you can kiss goodby any other awards your two teams might have won. It would be a looooooooooooooooooooong bus ride home! |
Re: Hypothetical Situation
Winning or losing is a bug issue and people have different interpretations of winning. While moving on the finals of a regional by losing a match is still winning I'd rather take a loss in a match and keep my integrity.
Either way you lose but this is what I'd do. |
Re: Hypothetical Situation
The issue of collusion was a much bigger deal in the past. Up until 2 years ago teams were ranked not by their wins but instead usually by some multiple of their opponents scores.(Think the current tie breaking system but for your overall rank) Thus it was often to both teams benefit if the other scored as high as possible. While this can only be taken so far in zero sum games like zone zeal in 2002, in 2003 with stack attack it was taken pretty far. Teams could start with stacks of boxes already set up. Opponents would often agree to each leave their opponent's stack untouched in order to improve their rankings. It was frowned upon to a certain extent but not as much as the collusion presented in this thread has people riled up and angry.
As for this situation, depending on the other teams in involved I would consider throwing the match. It would however have to be a very select group of teams. The other robots in my alliance would have to be poorly functioning or not at all for me to consider it as an option. Also as an aside, you don't get to compete that often, only 8 rounds if you only go to one regional and don't get into the finals. If you're driving you want to go out there and show off no matter the situation. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 15:31. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi