Re: New divisions at nats?
 

Divinci,
Libnitz
Faraday

no, i cannot spele

Re: New divisions at nats?
 

What about Sally?

Re: New divisions at nats?
 

I DOUBT anyone would be FIREd up about having SMOKEy (and the) BANDITs running around a field of STEEL MAGNOLIAS (aka, good-looking robots). We need to stick to NORMAl, RAEl scientists, even though Sally holds special PLACES IN THE HEART of many FIRSTers.

This would be as silly as a FLYING NUN.

I would NOT go to this field WITHOUT MY DAUGHTER and there would be no ABSENSE OF MALICE if you would SAY IT ISN'T SO.



Andy B.

Re: New divisions at nats?
 

Wow... I don't know what's scarier: Andy's reply or the fact the it took Andy's reply for me to get M's joke.

Exams have taken their toll I guess.

My vote is for Da Vinci, btw.

Re: New divisions at nats?
 

Faraday, Rutherford, Tesla.... Any of those would be good. :)

Re: New divisions at nats?
 

I'd say Edison and Socrates

Re: New divisions at nats?
 

My definite favs would be Franklin, and Edison.

Re: New divisions at nats?
 

Is this just hypothetical or are they really thinking to have these two new fields??? I mean because I don't think they could get 2 more fields in there... maybe one if they took away the legos... hmmm...

Re: New divisions at nats?
 

how bout in keeping with the technology theme the Gates Field or The Torvalds Field or even the Berners-Lee Field

Re: New divisions at nats?
 

Wozniak and Jobs sound pretty good

Re: New divisions at nats?
 

I'd say he's a good cantidate... As the inventor of controversy.

Re: New divisions at nats?
 

What about the Gravity field and the Electric field? Then at the finals, you could talk about the cases where the electric field dominates (or the other way around) ...

Sorry, recovering from a quantum physics test :yikes:

How 'bout Gauss? I mean, really, Gauss was everywhere. Number theory, imaginary numbers, linear algebra ... and that's not even to mention the half of it, and then there's his physics contributions (a little thing called Gauss's law for starters). Of course, as a programmer, I'd also have to appreciate Turing (previous suggestion).

Re: New divisions at nats?
 

Wasn't there a Gauss field in 2001, when they had 4 indoor fields plus the big Einstein bandshell, at Epcot?

Re: New divisions at nats?
 

No... there were only four fields. Einstein was used as a field. The divisions were annotated by a color (Red, White, Blue, and Gold)

Re: New divisions at nats?
 

[QUOTE/]How 'bout Gauss? I mean, really, Gauss was everywhere. Number theory, imaginary numbers, linear algebra ... and that's not even to mention the half of it, and then there's his physics contributions (a little thing called Gauss's law for starters). Of course, as a programmer, I'd also have to appreciate Turing (previous suggestion).[/quote]
Nah we already got two math geniuses. If it came down to it, (I already want davinci) I guess I like the wright's. Those guys got it done. (Plus who better would represent the first american named field. Come-on the guys did what we do in competion every year. They just changed the world.)