![]() |
FIRST logo manipulation
Hey.
My team is developing a website and we are having a sort of internal conflict. The two people making the website want to enter it in the website contest next year and I pointed out that the use of the FIRST logo in the graphic on the top of the page may not be legal under copyright rules because it has been manipulated. Could anyone check this out and confirm/deny my statement? The website is www.team857.com. Thanks. |
Re: FIRST logo manipulation
I have noticed other teams with T-shirts and other items with a manipulated FIRST logo, like the circle would be transformed into an apple; but wether they had special permision or not, I do not know.
|
Re: FIRST logo manipulation
I was just thinking that because it will probably be entered in the competition, shouldn't it follow the rules?
|
Re: FIRST logo manipulation
Any earlier thread brought about these results....
http://www.usfirst.org/4vol/resource...ics/index.html You may also want to refer to this post. Emailing either one of the two people mentioned in the thread may be able to help you. http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...8&postcount=14 |
Re: FIRST logo manipulation
Quote:
I know, as far as reproducing the actual FIRST logo goes (on t-shirts, etc) a team had to have permission from FIRST, and their logo could only be shown in its true colors or black and white. To avoid any future chaos, I'd ask FIRST just to be sure. |
Re: FIRST logo manipulation
Our team won the website award this year. We had originally had a modified FIRST logo. We were informed that this was not allowed so we replaced it with a proper one. A logo or trademark should not be modified. Many teams do but if they do they are not conforming to proper standards and will not win any awards.
|
Re: FIRST logo manipulation
While FIRST says that you should not alter the logo, as long as you are not selling a product with the logo in question, and you are in fact a FIRST team, I dont think you will have a problem.
|
Re: FIRST logo manipulation
Check the 2004 competition documents, specifically section 2 - Communication, under paragraph 2.13 "USING THE FIRST LOGO" for guidelines.
|
Re: FIRST logo manipulation
Quote:
Now, to offer some thoughts. The primary reason of a trademark is to protect the consumer -- so they can associate a particular mark with a particular company (for better or for worse). However, it also offers protection to the company -- but this protection only exists so long as the company *actively* defends the trade mark. This explains why FIRST wants you to get it's approval before using the trademark or any derivative. And while FIRST has a protected right to this trademark, you also have a competing right of free speech. So, who wins? It all depends ... there's a thing known as "fair use" that says you can use any trademark you want under certain conditions (imagine trying to give a review of a Ford car, for instance, if you couldn't use the word Ford because the company forbit it!) The basics of it is that there is no confusion -- e.g., your use of Ford can't imply that Ford endorses you or that you are somehow affiliated with them. If I want to sell a soda and I put the label Coke-a-cola on it, odds are this will confuse some people. Here's a quote from one of the linked articles: Quote:
|
Re: FIRST logo manipulation
The apple referred to in the original post was (I assume) from our team, the NEW Apple Corps. Sorry Katie, we did get permission from FIRST to alter the logo. We made the changes with the apple replacing the circle and sent a copy of the graphic to FIRST. They gave us their stamp of approval and, viola, we have our Team 93 logo.
Good luck with your logo Wombat! Sean |
Re: FIRST logo manipulation
Quote:
|
Re: FIRST logo manipulation
Quote:
|
Re: FIRST logo manipulation
Thanks for the clarifications.
I convinced them to send the logo to FIRST to get it approved or disapproved. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:52. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi