![]() |
Taxicab Geometry
Ok, Taxicab Geometry is deceptively simple. It's exactly like Euclidean, except distance is defined as the sum of the absolute values of the diferences pf the corrdinates.
OR: dT = |AX - BX| + |AY - BY| + |AZ - BZ| + ... And you define everyting based on locuses and distance. Circle is easy. A segment = {P | dT(P, A) + dT(P, B) = dT(A, B)} Confused yet? |
Re: Taxicab Geometry
Quote:
|
Re: Taxicab Geometry
Quote:
2. If you keep to integers, that distance formula is for traveling along right-angled, regularly spaced straight paths. it's either really cool or really mind-boggling. frequently both. :yikes: (to start off, just use 2 dimensions, X & Y) |
Re: Taxicab Geometry
ok i think i got it
10-2=8 then you take a right at maple st. and then another right at North Pine and another right at Limestone and then another right at 4th. Wait I think I'm lost. :yikes: This stuff is way to confusing for me. |
Re: Taxicab Geometry
Think of it as 1st street, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, etc.
Here's an example of finding distance:
Got it yet? |
Re: Taxicab Geometry
Quote:
|
Re: Taxicab Geometry
OK. I get it. (I had never heard of it before.) Now does it have some profound, practical application?
Quote:
Also, in what way is a circle easy? I'm guessing you are defining a circle as being the locus of points equidistant from a given point. In that case, the "circle" will be a square turned diagonally, right? |
Re: Taxicab Geometry
So a "circle" is a square diamond in euclidian space.
[edit]Didn't read gwross's post! oops[/edit] I've used this before in game programming. |
Re: Taxicab Geometry
Quote:
What's this? (A personal favorite) {P | dT(P, A) = dT(P, B)} ;) Some points to try it with A, B (0, 0), (4, 2) (0, 0), (2, 4) (0, 0), (3, 3) ;) (-1, 1), (4, 1) |
Re: Taxicab Geometry
I still don't get it. Is your new formula, {P | dT(P, A) = dT(P, B)} supposed to be equivalent to your original one, {P | dT(P, A) + dT(P, B) = dT(A, B)}?
I would still like to know how you would read the(se?) equation(s?) out loud in English. [EDIT]BTW, i think my only problem is with your notation. Not with the concepts of Taxicab Geometry.[/EDIT] |
Re: Taxicab Geometry
Correct me if I'm wrong, but the notation is just standard set notation. For example, {x in R | x > 2} would be read as "all x beloning to the set of real numbers such that x is greater than 2."
Similarly, {P | dT(P, A) = dT(P, B)} would be the set off all points equidistant from two fixed points (A and B, in this case). Similarly, the set {P | dT(P, A) + dT(P, B) = dT(A, B)} would be the set of all points that are colinear with fixed points A and B (ie the sum of the distances from a point to each of the fixed points is the same as the total distance between the two fixed points). Further examples: {P | dT(P, A) = r} is the set of all points of fixed distance from A (ie a circle of radius r centered at A.) {P | dT(P, A) + dT(P, B) = c} is an elipse As for taxicab geometry, if this kind of thing interests you, there are entire branches of mathematics devoted to the study of non-Euclidean gemetry. I took half a semester of this stuff last year, so if you have any questions, please post and I'll try to answer. Also, if you want to do more research on your own, the formal mathematical name for this kind of thing is a Metric Space. |
Re: Taxicab Geometry
Quote:
|
Re: Taxicab Geometry
So what's the profound application?
Or is it left as a "trivial exercise for the reader" :) |
Re: Taxicab Geometry
Quote:
|
Re: Taxicab Geometry
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
*Or a rectangular prism in three dimensions, or a rectangular hyper-prism in more than three. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:23. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi