Re: FIRSTWiki
 

The principle that anyone can edit is highly held in the wiki community...

Usually, any vandals are negated swiftly because people notice and revert thanks to wiki's versioning system. Wiki accounts are built in, but they really only exist for attribution. Besides, even if we could interface to CD's username system (which would be nigh-impossible) what would it accomplish? CD doesn't really have a bouncer at the door
;)

Re: FIRSTWiki
 

hmmmi think the feds had something similar in the scouting database...obviously for scouting. What about hosting a page where every team would have a single page to display all their information that anyone on the team has the ability to change. That way information about teams can get out even easier than having to search for a webpage. Each page would have basic information of a team like a brief history, some logistical data...etc.

-Just some thoughts

Pat

Re: FIRSTWiki
 

Bah! I stand corrected!

Oh well, the oddly named "Friki" is but a dead link...

Time to make a New And Improved wiki!

Re: FIRSTWiki
 

Wether or not its the best choice, im gonna have a wikimedia setup on my webspace probably by the end of monday for FIRST purposes. I have been wanting to set one up and play around with it, so here is the perfect excuse to waste time. I'd be willing to run the official unofficial one, if people don't mind, but if thats the case, i, and hopefully other people, will have to really decide which software is the best.

Re: FIRSTWiki
 

I disagree. Completely. The reason that such projects as Wikipedia have been succesful is the lack of required registration. The aim is to lower the threshold requried to give information, not raise it. Someone can delete the *text* on a page ... but another person can restore it from the archives. And if a certain IP address presents a continuing problem, it can be banned from editing for a while. See here (though their servers seem to still be suffering from strain). The wiki concept succeeds because it is open ... close it, or at least make it less open and it will not flourish as easily.

Re: FIRSTWiki
 

We all registered from ChiefDelphi, didn't we? So if we can somehow use our accounts from ChiefDelphi... what's wrong?

Re: FIRSTWiki
 

The only thing using a CD registered user provides is an email address to go along with the account. This does about as much good as an IP address, which can be logged and banned by Wikis, because both can be spoofed. I think the reason for not requiring registering is allowing anonymity. Wikis want contributers to contribute as freely as possible, even if that means contributing anonymously to avoid any sort of negative feelings or whatever might result from their post.

Re: FIRSTWiki
 

Possibly. Stuff like team pages, rule stuff, etc. should definately be limited edit. But things like 'How to get an EDU to talk to a Palm I through USB' should probably be public. Mixed permissions?

Re: FIRSTWiki
 

Yeah, the MediaWiki engine allows for that, and it seems like common sense to me.

Re: FIRSTWiki
 

it lives: http://www.afiber.com/FIRSTwiki/index.php go to recent changes on the left side to see.... recent changes...


man im gonna have some fun playing around with this.

Re: FIRSTWiki
 

TWiki has some very cool stuff like the draw plugin (which incidentally could probably be ported to mediawiki) And other goodies.

useModwiki just looks way to simple from the examples i have seen. There seem to be literally hundreds (http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?WikiEngines) but only a few come close to the having the features that i think are neccesary, or more importantly, a large enough community to stay in active development and stay current with features.

MORE UPDATE:

On second though, maybe restricting editin to logged in users might be a good thing. Not because of security or vandalism or anything, it would just be nice to at least have something more than IP address to credit a contribution to.