![]() |
pic: USA Teams
|
Re: pic: USA Teams
Opsies. I didn't realize the image will be scaled down so much so I am posting here a link to the original:
http://users.wpi.edu/~piotrm/first/maps/teams.png |
Re: pic: USA Teams
wow, thats amazing to see all the teams spread out and concentrated in so many different areas. now if someone were to make a map with all the canadian teams on it ;) it would be so difficult to scale though, as we only have huge concentration in GTA, and then dots of teams around the country and only in some provinces.
|
Re: pic: USA Teams
YEAH! look at west palm beach and 179 all right there on the most eastern part of florida, YA!
|
Re: pic: USA Teams
Wow. What did you use to make that?
|
Re: pic: USA Teams
Quote:
|
Re: pic: USA Teams
Could you make one(or someone else) in svg? Then you could look at the entire U.S., or just zoom in on one state.
|
Re: pic: USA Teams
I can see my house... er, team.
That's really interesting to see the spread of all the different teams. |
Re: pic: USA Teams
Piotr, awesome job. Again. Is there anything you can't do in Perl?
|
Re: pic: USA Teams
If anyone cares, I have put up images for each state with the teams labeled at http://users.wpi.edu/~piotrm/first/maps/states/big/ and smaller versions of the same stuff at http://users.wpi.edu/~piotrm/first/maps/states/small/.
Quote:
|
Re: pic: USA Teams
you're missing at least 1 team in NJ. 816 out of WestHampton. (or it's in the worng place and I missed it). They should be right in the same area as team 87.
This is definitely good work and very interesting. Would you consider posting the source for this? It would be interesting to run this for each FIRST competition year and see the spread over time. (and to see the relationship between new regionals and teams in those areas). |
Re: pic: USA Teams
Hmmmm, I don't see my team.
Team 121 from Rhode Island. Should be there right underneath 1350 (Go Rambot! :cool: ) We occupy The Island.... MrToast, who can't see his house... :( |
Re: pic: USA Teams
it's cool to see the various concentrations throughout the country, and how all along the interstate in the northeast there are teams. I think we need to start naming the 4 major "belts" (Northeast, the two in california, and Indiana/Michigan) My suggestion for Northeast? the "style belt"
With FIRST, its all about style! In the northeast, we are alllll style.-Andy Grady |
Re: pic: USA Teams
Nice job. I like maps, and I especially like useful maps. :) I have a question though- is there any way to spread teams out? In Phoenix we have several large suburbs instead of lots of smaller towns, and the teams stack up so much you wouldn't have any idea that there were more than a handle of teams by looking at the map. Also is there a way to make the state boundaries darker on the state maps? Just a few suggestions. Thank you for the supurb maps! :)
|
Re: pic: USA Teams
This is very cool! Would it be possible for you to post an even higher resolution map than the one in the web link? (Entire US)
Thanks! Great Work! |
Re: pic: USA Teams
That is really awesome!
How did you do that?! And wow, the East Coast has a bunch of teams in the northern area. I didn't realize exactly how many, that's awesome! How long did that take you? --d0ri :] |
Re: pic: USA Teams
Haha, there's a line of FIRST teams in North Dakota.
Those concentration centers are really interesting, I can point out Los Angeles, San Fransicso, Seattle, Phoenix, Denver, Houston, Atlanta, Detroit, and then the giant glob of teams known as the NorthEast. I never noticed how many teams were in Michigan Wait a minute, where are poor Alaska and Hawaii? :( |
Re: pic: USA Teams
Yes, the team allocation throughout the US is very interesting... there's too much open space!
|
Re: pic: USA Teams
Quote:
Code:
25: North Brunswick,NJ,USA [,] |
Re: pic: USA Teams
Quote:
Or if your browser or viewer can't handle that kind of big stuff, you can try http://users.wpi.edu/~piotrm/first/m...ms_usa_10k.png or http://users.wpi.edu/~piotrm/first/m...ams_usa_5k.png. |
Re: pic: USA Teams
Quote:
There are a few things this requires. One is that you have gdlib installed as well as the GD perl module. Also is required the Geo::ShapeFile perl module. One can get em off CPAN by doing this: Code:
perl -MCPAN -eshellOnce you get that file you need to generate cities2.storable by typing: Code:
cat Pop_places_deci | perl make_data2.pl cities2.storableNow you should be ready to make a map. Do so by typing: Code:
perl make_usa.pl 1000 map.png map_with_teams.pngSorry but the perl source is not very nice looking but hopefully anyone that needs to can figure out how to make the changes they want. |
Re: pic: USA Teams
WE"RE NOT IN THE LIST OR ON THE MAP!
1227- Grand Rapids, MI, USA. |
Re: pic: USA Teams
I think Leo, IN is also referred to as Leo-Cedarville, IN.
|
Re: pic: USA Teams
Quote:
Because of that you are actually on the map, just in the wrong place. Look to the north-west from where your Grand Rapids is. |
Re: pic: USA Teams
Quote:
|
Re: pic: USA Teams
This is excellent! Its really interesting to look at the clusters of teams and where they are, we just need to get it so that there is atleast one dot in every state and about double the dots... yay for robotics. lol
added... I dont really know what thread this would be put in, but Its something that I wanted to share and I guess with this being about location of teams it is a good thread to put it in. -My parents are considering moving and when looking at houses/areas part of their criteria was that the local high school had to have a robotics team. :) It made me happy. |
Re: pic: USA Teams
wowowowow!!! that is awesome... and interesting. just look at the concentration of teams. great job making this!
i never realized there were so many teams in my tiny city... 7 of em in flint!!! detroit has us beat by one tho... darn! |
Re: pic: USA Teams
114 is missing also. (Los Altos, California)
Great work, but I think us teams on the west coast need to get working and start more teams. :D |
Re: pic: USA Teams
Quote:
Piotrm, you can use Pasadena, CA for team 980. You could try La Canada, also, which is probably slightly more accurate, but I'm not sure if your source would have it like that, or with the proper accent marks (which I'm not sure what they are). A few of those other missing teams should be easy, IE the Phila being Philadelphia and the missing H in westhampton. |
Re: pic: USA Teams
Piotr you never cease to amaze me with your programming skills. I am so glad we have you on our team.
|
Re: pic: USA Teams
wow no current teams in Nebraska, Minnesota, Idaho, and Utah.....interesting
|
Re: pic: USA Teams
http://users.wpi.edu/~piotrm/first/m...g/teams_tx.png
Check out all the rookies in Houston. Nine this year: 1255, 1326, 1460, 1477, 1479, 1480, 1484, 1485, 1490 |
Re: pic: USA Teams
Quote:
Code:
25: North Brunswick, NJ, USACode:
1. New Hampshire ( about 15 teams per million people ) |
Re: pic: USA Teams
Quote:
PS: Are you really bored this summer?!?!?!? or just honing your skills??? Thanks again! |
Re: pic: USA Teams
If you squint your eyes, and tilt your head sideways, the dots seem to form a vague outline of JVN...
|
Re: pic: USA Teams
Piotr you once again impress me and please me with your skills. Thank you for taking the time out and to work on the maps. Nice job.
|
Re: pic: USA Teams
which state has the most teams registered? :yikes:
|
Re: pic: USA Teams
Looking at the FIRST program that was distributed, California does at 97, with Michigan pulling a close second at 90.
<sidenote> I'd like to see this, California vs. Michigan, number of teams registered in 2005. WHO WILL PREVAIL? </sidenote> |
Re: pic: USA Teams
Quote:
|
Re: pic: USA Teams
Here's the Top 5 with the number of teams for each:
1. California - 97 2. Michigan - 90 3. New York - 74 by the program, 77 by the above post (Insert Ontario - 63, here) 4. Virginia - 48 5. Pennsylvania - 42 |
Re: pic: USA Teams
Quote:
Very impressive work on the map - thanks for making it! |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 18:53. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi