![]() |
Re: Official 2005 Clue Thread
I do believe:
1) We'll definitely have IR beacons, very possibly moving this year. 2) Auto mode will exist, and be very important. 3) There will be an end of round ritual to perform, or position to be in for more points. 4) The number of teams/regional and the total regional time is similar to last year. Therefore, the time/round probably CAN'T increase, unless they increase the number of robots "processed" per round, or reduce total rounds played per team, which would cause complaints (especially considering the cost increase). 5) Similarly, they can't REDUCE the number of robots processed per round from four, without potentially causing timing problems. SO... I predict we'll still see alliances of some kind. If the "four is not enough" clue is valid, I assume this hint implies we'll probably have SIX robots on the field, in either a 3 vs 3 situation on a nice simple rectangular field, or 2 vs 2 vs 2 on a hexagonal field. 6) Note that one variable that is NOT constrained and MAY change is the ratio of Auto to Manual time! THAT could be interesting! 7) Could the "Pi between you and me" have something to do with the HP's role??? How about the HP wearing funny glasses and ADVISING the drivers about the location of an IR beacon that is not visible to them??? 8) A hexagonal field is possible with decent viewing. Viewing isn't a problem if the third team is directly opposite the viewing side. 9) In addition to hinting at the number three, *I* interpret all of the triple play references could POSSIBLY mean that some ritual involving dashing between locations may be involved. 10) The LED Robot Active Blinkers issued last year are simply Blue and Red LED drivers, with ONLY two signal lines. If you drive BOTH at the same time, you generate a crude "purple". Therefore, there MAY be a three single or alliance situation given the 2004 IFI hardware, but no more than that. All may change though if they issue a new RAB, revert to the Gumball, or change the Robot Controller, but I can't imagine IFI would redesign the RC again so soon if they didn't have to, and though the RABs were not very noticeable, I'm guessing they'll use it again as people complained about the gumballs a lot. If *I* were at IFI, I'd want to milk the 2004 RC for at least a few more years to recover the R&D costs on it! 11) Carpeting comes in 12 foot wide rolls. Therefore, the EASIEST field dimensions to implement (without trimming) is a rectangular one, with width roughly equal to 12*N, by any length. 24' x N' across has held true for the last several seasons. If a hexagonal field IS used, I predict the size will be a multiple of 12' across between opposite flat sides. Bottom line prediction: Given the current IFI and field hardware, I guess the SIMPLEST interpretation is a 3 vs 3 alliance game, on a standard 24' (or 36'?) wide rectangular field, or a hex as spec'd in (11). Auto Mode will be important, moving IR beacons may be there, something weird or missing will be the center of the field, running BETWEEN places will be required, and some kind of ritual or position must be performed at the end for more points, as before. BTW... What HASN'T happened yet but IMHO would be COOL, would be to have an alliance with one or more of the robots predesignated as having to do something DIFFERENT than the other(s) so that handoffs, etc. between robots may be REQUIRED. Designating who does what tasks may be done by the alliances. If an alliance robot fails, one robot may do more tasks. However, I see nothing other than the fact that John and George were "unusual" to hint at distinct tasking this year. <darn> General Notes: To Kit - George Burns the comedian/actor lived to be 100 years old, not 110. To Swampdude - Why do you say we're getting less motors? Did you hear something? Please tell! - Keith Mc. |
Re: Official 2005 Clue Thread
WHAT IF....It were a hexagonal field with 2 alliances (3 teams each)...using baseballs as field objects and there is a circular barrier or goal in the middle? One alliance being the red alliance and the other blue (red+blue=amethyst). Just a thought...
|
Re: Official 2005 Clue Thread
Quote:
Wait though, there are a lot of reason's it's realted to the beatles!
|
Re: Official 2005 Clue Thread
Has anyone noticed that it should be "Pi, you and I"?
|
Re: Official 2005 Clue Thread
Quote:
|
Re: Official 2005 Clue Thread
Quote:
Look closely and you will see Something between Pi, You and Me." 'See' and 'me' rhyme. I dont know if it has anything to do with the game clue however. |
Re: Official 2005 Clue Thread
My grammar skills aren't that great but shouldn't it be "Pi you and me"??? And something tells me purple, go with purple, go with Hendrix. Something there, something in Purple Haze, and baseball. I don't know why, I love the Beatles I have original copies of the Srg. Pepper's Lonely Heart Band and so many others, but something just doesn't "click" with it to me. I feel that baseball, and Mike Menosky has something to do with it, he went to Indiana University of Pennsylvania, and from tracking the .314 SLG he was the only one of the 4 baseball players that I mentioned that went to college... I don't know but it seems as if baseball plays a more important role than most of us here are thinking.
Ivey George Burns the comedian had another real acting role in 1939, in the movie Honolulu, he played Joe Duffy. |
Re: Official 2005 Clue Thread
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Then again...I might totally be off, so ya |
Re: Official 2005 Clue Thread
Quote:
What if your robot has to pick up the baseballs and collect it all in the middle and the number of balls your robot has has to be between 5 and 100 in order to win and the number that is closest to the average, 52.5, or 53, will get higher points. Then again, we might all be goin totally off course on this clue and it might be as simple as the amethyst colored field being just a hexagon, alliances of 3 teams each, and your robot has to pick up a pie and place it between you and someone else. |
Re: Official 2005 Clue Thread
After about page 8 or 9, I ran out of time for this thread (have other things to do)...but I do have an idea that I didn't see in the posts I read:
What if a robot plays an unassisted triple play somehow in the game (something that the robot does without his alliance partner) and when it does, that team gets the red+blue score. Edit: I would also like to point out a similarity between John and George: They were both first (FIRST?) baseman |
Re: Official 2005 Clue Thread
Its something with a Golden Mean, that would explain the Pi, you and me
|
Re: Official 2005 Clue Thread
Quote:
http://imdb.com/name/nm0122675/?fr=c2l0ZT1kZnxteD0yMHxzZz0xfGxtPTIwMHx0dD1vbnxwbj 0wfHE9R2VvcmdlIEJ1cm5zfGh0bWw9MXxubT1vbg__;fc=1;ft =20;fm=1 He was an actor in many movies. Sgt. Pepper Movie was not his only "acting" role as you put it. In fact, in a memorable role, he played God in the "Oh God" movies. |
Re: Official 2005 Clue Thread
Quote:
|
Re: Official 2005 Clue Thread
Quote:
|
Re: Official 2005 Clue Thread
Another thing to think about is that Amethyst lenses are often used to enhance color discrimination in optical systems.
This COULD imply either: - The Human Player has the role of wearing glasses to "see something" the driver's can't, and try to ADVISE them (now wouldn't THAT be cool?? ...especially if the thing they see is CHANGING during the round...); - or something like a color sensor may be included in the KOP to discriminate between things during Auto Mode. IMHO, either one would be a neat innovation. - Keith McClary |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 00:02. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi