![]() |
Tetra Math
Not that you all couldn't figure this out on your own, but I'll spare you the effort:
For a tetrahedron with side of length x: distance from midpoint of one side to opposite corner of same face (base altitude): sqrt(3)*x/2 distance from midpoint of one side to the horizontal center of the tetra (below the top point): sqrt(3)*x/6 (1/3 total length of base altitude) distance from any base point to the horizontal center of the tetra (below the top point): sqrt(3)*x/3 (2/3 total length of base altitude) height of tetra: sqrt(2/3)*x |
Re: Tetra Math
does anyone know how many tetra's can be fit under one of the goal by any chance?
|
Re: Tetra Math
Quote:
|
Re: Tetra Math
Quote:
|
Re: Tetra Math
Quote:
Let's say each tetra raises the stack about 3"? And you need about 28" clearance left to fit the last tetra in ... 4? That doesn't sound right. 7ish-9ish? I think I just fried my sleep-deprived brain. (edit) Err, cross that out .. I mean around 4-6 maybe per stack.. maybe.. assuming each tetra raises each stack 3". I think. Someone check my math or logic or something, brain's not working well right now.. Assuming you can fit 4 perfect stacks of 4 inside the goal, that's 16. I'd say go with stacking on top of the goal.. go for containing if you're having a lot of problems with designing the arm, but stacking will give you three times the amount of points you can get by containing .. and the possibility of making a row. |
Re: Tetra Math
Quote:
According to the kickoff, each tetra raises the stack approx. six inches. |
Re: Tetra Math
one tetra added to the goal is a height increase of exactly 3.5 inches. Therefore, if you just add about 5 tetra's, thats about another foot and a half. So if you have an arm, you would need to have a 10.5 foot at full extension to out class other arms
|
Re: Tetra Math
Quote:
|
Re: Tetra Math
It is 6 inches per tetra...this is comming from someone who's seen them built and stacked on eachother.
|
Re: Tetra Math
i calulated using a formula i learned in statistics, the width of the pole vs height/ complicated math suff
|
Re: Tetra Math
pole=pvc pipe
|
Re: Tetra Math
i made tetra's too and did see that it was 3.5, ill go see if the tetra's was built properly
|
Re: Tetra Math
sojouner06, try to edit your posts instead of creating new ones.
ftp://67.170.35.253/robotics/Posting.swf Anyways, did you take into consideration about the end-caps. Also, when looking at the sidelines during the kickoff, it looked more like 6 inches. |
Re: Tetra Math
I thought that the tetras used at the actual competitions don't have PVC endcaps but instead have flat pieces that screw into the PVC?
|
Re: Tetra Math
i was in manchester and saw the offical ones and adding them ontop of each other adds SIX inches....i also tested the how many fit under a goal and 7 perfectly stacked will make it as long as there are no tetras ontop of the goal. if there is a tetra ontop of the goal then you can only fit 4 under
|
Re: Tetra Math
Quote:
|
Re: Tetra Math
Quote:
|
Re: Tetra Math
anyone know what the angle is between faces? I drew a tet in AutoCad and I measured it to be 55 degrees, but I think there is something wrong with this.
Lucid |
Re: Tetra Math
The angle can be calculated by looking at a cross section of the tetra, giving 2*arcsin(1/sqrt(3)), which is approximately 70 degrees.
|
Re: Tetra Math
Quote:
:) I love math, algebra and trig :D me = nerd :p |
Re: Tetra Math
Quote:
|
Re: Tetra Math
think about it here, 6 inches, thats half a foot. Even with end caps at the largest constraint is 4 inches. It is physicaly impossible for it to be a six inch increase per tetra. IMPoSIBLE!!!!!!!!!!!! unless someone put it on a freaky way
|
Re: Tetra Math
We've also built tetras...it is 6". The sides of one tetra do not even come close to being flush up against the sides of the one below it. I think it is partially because the sides of the lower one get jammed into the corners of the one on top.
|
Re: Tetra Math
Quote:
|
Re: Tetra Math
I wish i had seen this thread sooner. I had to do this math today but oh well i like math. Nice thread.
|
Re: Tetra Math
ok i believe it is 6 inches, but wait, how thick are your pipes. The manual said they should be 1 and a quarter inches at pipe and 1.(4-9) inches at endcap
or...maybe...how long are the pipes themselves? 40"? 48"? 70"? |
Re: Tetra Math
http://www.ifirobotics.com/first-2005-field-parts.shtml
look here for the parts first wants you to get |
Re: Tetra Math
Quote:
|
Re: Tetra Math
ok, it is 6 inches, but i am still baffaled! how can the formula i used be wrong???? what could be an outside influence to change the height so drastically...
|
Re: Tetra Math
To clarify angles a bit:
The angle between a face and an edge is ~55 degrees. The angle between two faces is ~70 degrees. |
Re: Tetra Math
Quote:
|
Re: Tetra Math + CHemistry
The tetrahedral arangement of carbon atoms is what gives diamond the properties of density, hardness, and optical index of refraction(sparkle).
A tetrahedron can be made from an equilateral triangle (All angles 60 degrees) If you start with a triangle and then bisect eact side, You will have 4 triangles. By folding each face up, you will have a tetrahedron. You can see how that even as a solid shape these can pack together perfectly. In crystals this usually means high density, and isotropic ( the same in all directions) properties. |
Re: Tetra Math
I haven't seen two actually stacked so I don't know for sure how much of a raise each tetra adds. But in the rules i believe it said that if a tetra is stacked improperly and has more than 6 inches then it isn't considered to be stacked. So i believe that it raises less than 6 inches to leave a little margin for error.
|
Re: Tetra Math
the tetra is stacked at 6 inches in the home made tetra's but i think there is more equilibriam in the degrees for comp. so it could be lower
|
Re: Tetra Math
I was told by one of our mentors who went to the kickoff that it is raised six inches per tetra stacked.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:43. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi