Chief Delphi

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)
-   Extra Discussion (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=68)
-   -   pic: Cooney Quest 269 Final Robot #2 (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=32803)

Ricky Q. 14-01-2005 22:37

pic: Cooney Quest 269 Final Robot #2
 

JulieB 14-01-2005 22:38

Re: pic: Cooney Quest 269 Final Robot #2
 
Wiring? wow :ahh:

Pshyco 14-01-2005 23:24

Re: pic: Cooney Quest 269 Final Robot #2
 
Do you guys have one cim motor for each wheel???....

Ricky Q. 15-01-2005 01:10

Re: pic: Cooney Quest 269 Final Robot #2
 
Ok ok you got us, this really isnt our final 2005 robot. Team #269 just wanted to continue the excitement of posting robot pictures on CD and creating havoc, just like we started doing in 1999.

This is just one of the potential design mockups sitting on top of a prototype drive. No way we would allow a robot to go into competition looking like this. We are pretty far along, but I'm sure our 2005 robot will look nothing like this ;).

And yes this model has a CIM gearbox for each wheel...

sanddrag 15-01-2005 01:54

Re: pic: Cooney Quest 269 Final Robot #2
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ricky Q.
And yes this model has a CIM gearbox for each wheel...

See, that is the interesting part. We never received four CIM motors before so I'm guessing this is a little more than just a mock-up. I have a feeling your actual robot will look more like this than you'd want us to know.

Anyway, you appear to have a worm gear drive for the CIM motor on each wheel. Could you please explain why you think being non-backdriveable is important and also why you are settling for a lower efficiency? Thanks.

Robby 16-01-2005 00:00

Re: pic: Cooney Quest 269 Final Robot #2
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sanddrag
See, that is the interesting part. We never received four CIM motors before so I'm guessing this is a little more than just a mock-up. I have a feeling your actual robot will look more like this than you'd want us to know.

Anyway, you appear to have a worm gear drive for the CIM motor on each wheel. Could you please explain why you think being non-backdriveable is important and also why you are settling for a lower efficiency? Thanks.

the worm drives are there basically because they give us the reduction we need in i very small package, each of those gearboxes as you can see fit nicely off in the corner of the robot and we can build anything we want around them. The non-backdriveable part is just a byproduct of using the worm gears and not our reason for using them. As for settling for a lower efficiency, these are basically the same gear boxes we used last year for our two wheel drive system and were completely satisfied with their efficiency, performance, and robustness.

the interesting part of this drive is what lies between the two front wheels and the two rear wheels, although not readily visible in the photo

russell 16-01-2005 01:39

Re: pic: Cooney Quest 269 Final Robot #2
 
Aha! I know what it is. But I wont tell. Just tell me so I know if im right :D


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 16:57.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi