PHP Nuke
 

Why do teams insist on building their site in PHP Nuke?
I Think there are like a million teams that built their site with PHP N.
I understand it's easy, dynamic and powerful, but how about INNOVATION (hint, hint).
Why not be creative and use original code and graphics that you can call your own and be proud at?
It may not be the prettiest or whatever site in the contest, but it will be original, innovative and different. and most of all, it will be the way you really want it to be.

think about it...

Re: PHP Nuke
 

I have the same question (Why do teams insist on building their sites in PHP-Nuke?) but for a different reason. I don't see anything wrong with using a CMS, and in fact, i see something wrong with not using a free CMS when it is so perfectly suited to the needs of a robotics team website. I just don't understand why people use the buggy, insecure, and generally crappy PHP Nuke when there are so many better alternatives.

Re: PHP Nuke
 

Just wondering, does using PHP Nuke or any other service qualify for a website award entry?
Or does it have to be student built from scratch all the way down to the coding? I'm 90% sure it's the latter but i want to be 100% sure :D
Please correct me if I'm wrong.

Re: PHP Nuke
 

Its not a service, it's a piece of software. And yes, it definitley qualifies for the award. Disallowing any non-custom code for the website would be as stupid as requiring the robot to be built entirely from raw materials with the only purchaseable items being aluminum ore and petroleum.

Re: PHP Nuke
 

If you're going to use PHP Nuke, I hope you'd at least customize the template a things like that to at least make it LOOK original. I never really kept tabs on the web awards.. but have any sites with a basic Nuke theme and basic addons ever won an award? PHP Nuke seems to really kill originality.

Re: PHP Nuke
 

Read that and wanted to play devil's advocate. Making robots out of ore and petroleum is more like writing an http server, and a language. My (limited) experience with build is that you order parts, not a complete grasping arm. I view PHP-nuke and alot of the larger CMS projects as similar to an arm, and not a screw or even aluminum ore.

There is a middle ground between having teams do everything themselves and nothing themselves. Not trying to bash any of the teams who have posted, but you do see sites here made using premade templates. Could we apply the same logic here? The look of the website is the aluminum ore! Its the special people who took the effort to open dreamweaver, or download a theme! What, then, would the website award honor? Is it an award for writing complete cohesive paragraphs? Or is it learning about how websites are built, and then applying it? I would hope that the emphasis is on teams putting together websites with as much done "internally" as possible.

Disclaimer: This was written by someone who actually enjoys sitting in photoshop or with his texteditor, and has been doing "web development" for years, so he doesn't really quite remember what it was like to put together websites the first time around.

Re: PHP Nuke
 

I find any kind of CMS very helpful. Especially if your team is lacking in members that can use HTML, PHP and so on. But I have to agree by using PHP Nuke you run the risk of looking exactly like someone else's site. What my team uses is e107 which is an open-source CMS. There site is www.e107.org One of its' cooler features is allowing each user to view the site in a different theme. This gives power to the users which is great. Check out our site at www.aceshigh176.com It is made with e107 and only took about a day to set up.

Re: PHP Nuke
 

I wrote an original CMS for our site :-)

PHP-Nuke type cms's are useful for people who can't code, I guess.

It definitely helps to use _some_ pre-written code (we have a phpbb forum).
I would think that if the team customized the template to give the site a good look and feel, using a CMS isn't a sin.

--Jonathan

Re: PHP Nuke
 

Yeah, pre-written CMS's are great for people that can't code or don't want to waste time on writing one.. but FIRST is supposed to be a learning experience. Learn first, win awards later. If you have the ugliest site in all of FIRST, but you did it correctly and learned something from it, that's way more important than figuring out how to roll out a CMS. If you're doing this to learn how to become a web developer, I can tell you now that not many pro web developers use PHP Nuke :)

Re: PHP Nuke
 

Personally I think php-nuke is extremely large and bloated. Designing your own cms is a lot simpler and you can acually understand whats going on.

However, I have no problem with a team using a nuke template because some users might not have the knowledge to do so. We're all forgetting that the thing that makes a FIRST site competitive is the content, rather than its design. Besides, the 3 column layout looks professional and is easy to use.

Re: PHP Nuke
 

peaseonearth: I find any kind of CMS very helpful. Especially if your team is lacking in members that can use HTML, PHP and so on. But I have to agree by using PHP Nuke you run the risk of looking exactly like someone else's site.

I guess the CMS thing also has the same problem, these sites look almost identical when looked at very quickly


http://www.max1071.com/news.php

http://www.aceshigh176.com

Re: PHP Nuke
 

i don't think that PHP-Nuke sites should be allowed to enter the website contest. There's nothing wrong with using PHP-Nuke as your website, but using a pregenerated page, and adding text to it is kind of cheap, especially since other people developed their website from scratch and put a lot of thought in to it. It's also not unique, it would be as if FIRST gave us pregenerated robots for us to "customize" by drawing on them. Here are my analogies

Nuts and bolts = HTML tags
Robot parts (ex. arms) = Scripts (note that the developer makes this)
Robot design (framework) = CSS/HTML (again, the majority of the framework, or design is done by the developer)
Robot CPU = Scripting language (ex. PHP)

if you are using PHP-Nuke, you are taking a premade "robot" and adding content to it, thus you aren't technically 'developing' the website, rather adding content (BIG difference, anyone can write a paragraph, not many can make a valid XML 1.1 page)

again, these are my opinions, feel free to discuss.

Re: PHP Nuke
 

Again, if you can't build a site better than a phpnuke template, you have a long way to go my friend.

Re: PHP Nuke
 

I think all of you have some very big misconceptions about FIRST. Winning the robot part of the competition is not about learning or doing unneccesary work. It works just like "winning" in industry. You are given a goal with some simple restrictions. That's it. No one really cares how you get it done, just the fact that you get it done. If I can make a website based on a free CMS and make a more functional, content-rich, and aesthetically pleasing website, why should it matter?

There are very few rules restricting what can go on the robot beyond safety rules and rules that limit the advantage that teams with very large resources have. I don't see how disallowing (or frowning upon) freely available tools, tools that are available to real web developers, makes any sense.

Re: PHP Nuke
 

Here's a direct quote from the PhpNuke faq...
"Need I to know HTML to use PHP-Nuke?
The answer is no. You only need to know the basic functions to change somethings through the system administration included in PHP-Nuke. This system is designed to do all its jobs automated using your preferred web browser. You'll never need to edit files in your server."

"The Website Award recognizes excellence in student-designed, built, and managed FIRST team websites." Direct quote from the official document. Using a predesigned or built website would disqualify you. Does PHPNuke count as predesigned or built? In my opinion yes, it would be the same as getting a professional to build your site, and you add content to it (and maybe some little changes) I'm going to send an email to FIRST to clear things up though.