Chief Delphi

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)
-   Scouting (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=36)
-   -   Top Seeds at Regionals (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=37084)

Ethulin 10-04-2005 14:46

Re: Top Seeds at Regionals
 
lol, I wish I could be of more help, all I know is that we, 492, were first seed at the PAC-NW.

If anyone has a complete list for the PAC-NW please post it.

Ein 10-04-2005 15:42

Re: Top Seeds at Regionals
 
I know 20 was top seed at UTC, followed by 69. I'm not positive beyond that.

JasJ002 11-04-2005 10:04

Re: Top Seeds at Regionals
 
Hey does anybody have the Long Island regional seedings? :D

Paul H 11-04-2005 12:52

Re: Top Seeds at Regionals
 
Already Posted

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mark McLeod
I don't remember them all at the Long Island Regional, but these are the ones I do.

1 527
2 353
3 270
4 514
5 287
6 533
7 59
8 (176 or 271? not positive)


EricH 12-04-2005 23:55

Re: Top Seeds at Regionals
 
Sacramento before selection:
1. 1072
2. 254
3. 330
4. 56
5. 245
6. 599

Below this I don't remember.

Los Angeles before selection:
1. 69
2. 980
3. 22?

Again, I don't remember much below this.

SteveO 13-04-2005 01:20

Re: Top Seeds at Regionals
 
Las Vegas:

1. 1425
2. 987
3. 368
4. 1641
5. 64
6. 473
7. 1324
8. 359

whakojacko 13-04-2005 17:29

Re: Top Seeds at Regionals
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by EricH
Sacramento before selection:
1. 1072
2. 254
3. 330
4. 56
5. 245
6. 599

Below this I don't remember.

Los Angeles before selection:
1. 69
2. 980
3. 22?

Again, I don't remember much below this.

It was 1079, not 1072. :)

phrozen solyd 14-04-2005 01:10

Re: Top Seeds at Regionals
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by whakojacko
It was 1079, not 1072. :)

It was 1097, not 1079 or 1072. ;)

EricH 14-04-2005 22:42

Re: Top Seeds at Regionals
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by phrozen solyd
It was 1097, not 1079 or 1072. ;)

That's more or less right.. It can't have been 1079 as they only went to L.A. to my knowledge (such as it is).

whakojacko 14-04-2005 23:40

Re: Top Seeds at Regionals
 
er 1097, lol good catch

Joe Domingo 15-04-2005 14:56

Re: Top Seeds at Regionals
 
Socal

69
980
702
995
1622
599
207
1515


Arizona
980
555
842
498
1492
991
60
1633

Meyerman 15-04-2005 16:07

Re: Top Seeds at Regionals
 
New Jesrsey
1. 56 - Galileo
2.1279-Newton
3.75-Galileo
4.869- not attending nationals
5.272-Galileo
6.752-Curie
7.25-Galileo
8.1626-Galileo


hmmm 5 outta 8 are Galileo should be fun seeing all of u guys again

RyanMcE 15-04-2005 17:18

Pacific Northwest Regional Alliances
 
1 Attachment(s)
PNW Top 8 teams & alliance partners -

492, 1595, 604
847, 957, 753
1458, 372, 1430
1566, 1087, 1510
1425, 956, 1571
1359, 948, 1569
1540, 997, 1039
481, 955, 1441

ZZII 527 15-04-2005 18:32

Re: Top Seeds at Regionals
 
SBPLI Top 8 Before Picking:

527
353
270
514
287
533
59
329

SBPLI Regional Playoff Alliances:

http://web.mit.edu/scolton/www/rankingsmall.jpg

The one missing team in the third spot of the 8th alliance was 500.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 17:07.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi