![]() |
2002 Divisions..
YEEEESS!!! First has finally posted this years divisions for the championship event. They are here: http://www.usfirst.org/frc/public/FM...-max=all&-find in the rightmost column..Fellow Newtoners, look out..hehe.
|
My hands are shaking!
Really!
I am all butterflies inside. Details, details, details. 1 week to obsess about it... Joe J. |
I'm exicted now...
one more week... |
a quick first impression
At first glance, it looks like FIRST did a decent job splitting up the divisions (skipping the obvious complaint that I would have loved to be in the same division as 60 or 469).
I don't agree with the way they divided the teams: take a block of 5-10 teams in numerical order and put them in division x, the next 5-10 in division y, etc, but it looks like it worked. I also noticed that 60 & 254 were in the same divsion so FIRST didn't necessarily split up teams that won regionals together. Now I get to noodle over ways to get more QP than the Bomb Squad and pick out the best potential partners from the amazing crop of teams in Einstein (just in case we're fortunate enough to be picking). Mike PS - I wonder if being in Einstein means that we get to bake out in the sun more than the other divisions |
Take a second glance
They didn't make any attempt at all to spread out the Regional Champion teams. 16 are in Archimedes, including one 2-region winner, 11 in Curie, including two 2-region winners, and 7 each in Einstein and Newton.
|
Its going to be fun no matter what
intresting how its going to play out...
wonder if we get a rematch with 16 again! |
On third glance, however ...
After running the numbers through the MOE Supercomputer, it appears that, apart from the actual number of regional champions, each division is fairly equal. Here's the statistics, based solely on each team's results in regional Qualification Matches:
Newton Einstein Curie Archimedes Avg Won/Loss % 53.2% 53.2% 49.2% 52.1% Avg Highest QP 106.6 103.4 101.8 107.1 Avg QP 54.3 55.3 52.8 55.3 |
if einstein is its own division this year, does that mean that the other three wont play any qualifiction matches on the big filed outside?
|
randomness?
look at the team list for the championship. If you look down the division column you will see that they is a repeated sequence of einstien, Arcimedes, curie, and newton. I know from the stats by bill that they are evn but can this be random??
|
I doubt that will happen i can already see some people being very unhappy if it does.
On the other hand i can the the first crew going "1.. 2.. 3.. NOT IT" i can already feel for them they are going to have to manage the field ALL DAY LONG BOTH DAYS what i am wondering about is team sitting if FIRST is going to have us running all over the place that is going to make soo much traffic between the field its going to be craZy |
Newton!
Look out for the Newton Division, here we come!!! :D
|
im soo excited i just cant hide it
im about to lose control and i think i like it Ok im done now...ive been waitng for this since....oOo mid-january... Curie...Watch out Jester is in the house...well tent...same difference...you get the general idea |
Re: My hands are shaking!
Quote:
|
Division STATS
Another way to look at the data that Ed Sparks provided to compare division strength:
Archimedes: 17 regional wins, 11 finalist, 3 #1-seed Curie: 13 wins, 11 finalist, 7 #1-seed Einstein: 9 wins, 6 finalist, 3 #-seed Newton: 7 wins, 9 finalist, 4 #1-seed From this we should conclude that Archimedes and Curie are the strongest divisions. The amount of #1-seeds in Curie leads me to conclude that division will have the highest QP scores and the biggest battle for who gets to pick first. |
Re: a quick first impression
Quote:
KA-108 |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:30. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi